About the Journal
History and scope
|
The journal Pandaemonium Germanicum, published since 1997 by the German Area of the Department of Modern Letters of the FFLCH/USP and the Post-Graduate Program in German Language and Literature, comprehends itself as a forum of academic discussion in the Germanistic field covering: German language literature, compared literature and cultural studies related to German-speaking countries, German linguistics, applied and contrastive linguistics (Portuguese/German), teaching of German as a foreign/additional language, and studies on translation logic. Pandaemonium seeks not only to disseminate studies by Germanists from Brazil and abroad, but also to contribute to the dialogue between German studies, other languages and literatures as well as further fields of knowledge. Pandaemonium is an open access journal published semi-annually until 2015 and three times a year from 2016 on. The manuscripts are submitted to double blind peer review. In case of divergent opinions, a third opinion is sought for. Accepted articles are throroughly edited before publishing. Pandaemonium accepts submissions of the following types of texts in the areas outlined above:
The journal considers texts on the topics listed above, written in continuous text and addressing specific themes in line with its calls for papers. |
|
Indexed in
|
|
|
Intelectual Property
|
|
|
Sponsors
|
|
|
Statement on ethics and malpractice
|
Pandaemonium Germanicum endeavours to comply with good publishing practices for scientific journals, according to the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It does not accept any kind of unethical behaviour or plagiarism and has tools available to detect it. |
|
Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and authorship
|
Pandaemonium Germanicum adheres to the position of COPE which affirms that AI tools cannot be listed as an author of a paper, as they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements. Therefore, authors who use AI tools in the writing of a manuscript, production of images or graphical elements of the paper, or in the collection and analysis of data, must be transparent in disclosing how the AI tool was used and which tool was used. Authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, even those parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics. |
|
Open Access Policy
|
According to the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (2022, p. 7), "open science is defined as an inclusive construct that combines various movements and practices that aim to make multilingual scientific knowledge openly available, accessible and reusable for all, and to increase scientific collaborations and information sharing for the benefit of science and society".
Considering the particularities of German Studies in Brazil, Pandaemonium Germanicum adopts the following principles of Open Science:
Sustainability of publishing practices by investing in the training of grant holders and interns. |
|
Conflict of interest
|
Conflicts of interest can be of a personal, commercial, political, academic or financial nature. Conflicts of interest can occur when authors, reviewers or editors have interests that may influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts. If there is, even potentially, a conflict of interest, the author(s) must disclose this in a signed document attached to the submission platform. Authors must identify in the manuscript all financial support obtained for the work and other personal connections related to the work. The reviewer must inform the editors of any conflicts of interest that could influence the analysis of the manuscript. |
|
Peer review
|
Pandaemonium Germanicum adopts a double-blind peer review process. Some data, such as the section editors' names, are published in each article. The editors' contributions are duly credited in the published article. Reviewers receive a statement of opinion on the manuscript and can also validate the activity in Publons or Reviewer Credit. |
|
Adoption of similarity check software
|
As part of its efforts to enhance academic integrity and prevent plagiarism in its publications, Pandaemonium Germanicum has adopted a text similarity identification service based on the Turnitin platform. |
|