Interlanguage analysis, formative assessment, and educational experimentation in teacher training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-8281.i42p23-43

Keywords:

Interlanguage, Formative assessment, Teaching writing, Cooperative learning, Action-research

Abstract

This article presents Osservare l’Interlingua (Observing Interlanguage), a project dedicated to teaching to write, which has involved tens of teachers and hundreds of primary and secondary school pupils in Reggio Emilia (Italy) and its province, since 2017. By means of sessions of teacher training and action-research activities carried out with the pupils, the project aims to promote forms of language education, which are effective and inclusive, i.e. proposed to the whole class, without dividing monolingual   and multilingual pupils, native or non-native speakers, with greater or lesser writing abilities. This paper comments on the theoretical-methodological principles that lay at the basis of the project teaching interventions, starting from the very idea of ‘interlanguage’, which gives the project its name: the analysis of each pupil’s written texts and writing strategies is crucial to the scope of designing and implementing pedagogical actions, which are responsive to the students’ actual developmental trajectories. This formative assessment values learning progress, makes it possible to identify the causes of problems and, consequently, allows planning targeted teaching interventions. After describing the project overall organisation and presenting some of its pedagogical interventions, the article summarises the main results obtained by a series of experimental studies that are periodically carried out on children’s oral and written productions, in order to verify the effects of pedagogical actions on their writing skills and on their motivation to write. Both types of study confirm the effectiveness of the project, which receives very positive feedback from all actors involved (teachers, students and families).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Gabriele Pallotti, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia

    Gabriele Pallotti teaches Modern Language Teaching at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research concerns the relationships between language education, socialisation and second language learning, teaching to writing and interlanguage analysis. He has coordinated national and international projects dedicated to educational research and experimentation. Gabriele has given numerous talks in Italy and abroad.

  • Fabiana Rosi, Università di Trento

    Fabiana Rosi is full professor at the University of Trento, where she teaches Foreign Language Teaching, Teaching of Italian L2/LS, General Linguistics and Glottology. Her research concerns L1 and L2 acquisition, teaching to write, grammar and content-integrated language teaching. She is actively involved in teacher training projects on language education. Fabiana has coordinated the Italian area of the Salerno branch of the “I Lincei per la scuola” network.

  • Claudia Borghetti, Università di Bologna

    Claudia Borghetti is Research Fellow at the University of Bologna, where she teaches Language Learning and Teaching, and L2 Italian Learning and Teaching. She researches on (academic) writing, intercultural language learning, and student mobility and multilingualism. She participates in numerous national and international research group. She has coordinated the European project IEREST (Intercultural Education Resources for Erasmus Students and their Teachers) as project manager.

References

ANDERSEN, R. W.; SHIRAI, Y. The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin-creole connection. In: RITCHIE, W. C. e BHATIA, T. J. (eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Academic Press, 1996, pp. 27-569.

ANTINUCCI, F.; MILLER, R. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, n. 3, 1976, pp. 167-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900001434.

BANFI, E.; BERNINI, G. Il verbo. In: GIACALONE RAMAT, A. (a cura di). Verso l’italiano. Roma: Carocci, 2003, pp. 70-115.

BEREITER, C.; SCARDAMALIA, M. The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987.

BERRUTO, G. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Roma: Carocci, 1987.

BLACK, P.; WILIAM, D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, n. 5.1, 1998, pp. 7-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.

CONSIGLIO D’EUROPA. Quadro comune europeo di riferimento per le lingue: apprendimento insegnamento valutazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 2002.

CORDER, S. P. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, n. 5, 1967, pp. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161.

CORTÉS VELÁSQUEZ, D.; NUZZO, E. (a cura di) Il task nell’insegnamento delle lingue. Roma: RomaTrE-Press, 2018. Disponibile all’indirizzo: http://romatrepress.uniroma3.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/1801-3589-1-SM.pdf. Ultima consultazione: 27/07/2021.

DE BENI, R.; CISOTTO, L.; CARRETTI, B. Psicologia della lettura e della scrittura: l’insegnamento e la riabilitazione. Trento: Erickson, 2001.

ELLIS, R. Reflections on task-based language teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2018.

FERRARI, S.; BURZONI, G. Imparare a scrivere meglio. Un’indagine sperimentale sugli effetti di una sperimentazione educativa sulle classi intere e sugli alunni plurilingui. Italiano LinguaDue, n. 10, 2018, pp. 308-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-3597/11312.

FLOWER, L. S.; HAYES, J. R. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, n. 32.4, 1981, pp. 365-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/356600.

GIACALONE RAMAT A. (a cura di) Verso l’italiano. Roma: Carocci, 2003.

HARRIS, K. R.; GRAHAM, S. Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books, 1996.

HATTIE, J. Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge, 2011.

HIDI, S. E.; BOSCOLO, P. (eds.) Writing and motivation. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.

KRASHEN, S. D. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.

KUIKEN, F.; VEDDER, I. Assessing functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based approach. In: TAGUCHI, N. e KIM, Y. (eds.). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2018, pp. 266-285.

LUNDSTROM, K.; BAKER, W. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, n. 18.1, 2009, pp. 30-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.

PALLOTTI, G. Osservare l’Interlingua: percorsi di educazione linguistica efficace per ridurre le diseguaglianze. In: VEDOVELLI, M. (a cura di). L’italiano dei nuovi italiani. Atti del XIX Convegno Nazionale GISCEL. Roma: Aracne, 2017a, pp. 505-520.

PALLOTTI, G. Applying the interlanguage approach to language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, n. 55.4, 2017b, pp. 393-412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0145.

PALLOTTI, G.; BORGHETTI, C.; ROSI, F. Insegnare a scrivere nella scuola primaria. Il progetto Osservare l’Interlingua. Bologna: Caissa, 2021.

PALLOTTI, G.; FERRARI, S.; BORGHETTI, C. Raccontare con la penna e con la voce, cosa è uguale e cosa cambia? In: VOGHERA, M., MATURI, P. e ROSI, F. (a cura di). Orale e scritto, verbale e non verbale: la multimodalità nell’ora di lezione. Firenze: Cesati, 2020, pp. 213-226.

PALLOTTI, G.; ROSI F. Più competenze, meno disuguaglianze: risultati di una sperimentazione di educazione linguistica inclusiva nella scuola secondaria di primo grado. In: VEDOVELLI, M. (a cura di). L’italiano dei nuovi italiani. Atti del XIX Convegno Nazionale GISCEL. Roma: Aracne, 2017, pp.193-209.

PIENEMANN, M. Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998.

POZZO, G. Il continuum della valutazione: la valutazione formativa e i suoi strumenti. In: GATTULLO, F. (a cura di). La valutazione degli apprendimenti linguistici. Scandicci: La Nuova Italia, 2001, pp. 37-72.

ROSI, F. Learning aspect in Italian L2: Corpus annotation, acquisitional patterns, and connectionist modelling. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2009.

ROSI, F.; BORELLI, C. Il processo di produzione scritta: la coesione verbale in testi di scuola primaria. Italiano LinguaDue, n. 6.2, 2014, pp. 247-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-3597/4700.

SELINKER, L. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, n. 10.1-4, 1972, pp. 209-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209.

STORCH, N. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013.

TARALLO, C. Una sperimentazione per educare a scrivere: analisi statistiche e valutazioni. Tesi (Dottorato in Studi letterari, Linguistici e Comparati) - Università di Napoli L’Orientale, Napoli, 2017.

TROIA, G. A.; SHANKLAND, R. K.; WOLBERS, K. A. Motivation research in writing: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Reading & Writing Quarterly, n. 28.1, 2012, pp. 5-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632729.

VYGOTSKIJ, L. S. Pensiero e linguaggio. Firenze: Giunti. 1992 [prima edizione: 1934].

WHITE, R. V.; ARNDT, V. Process writing. London: Longman, 1991.

WILIAM, D. Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, 2018.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J.; RISEMBERG, R. Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, n. 22.1, 1997, pp. 73-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919.

Published

2021-12-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pallotti, G., Rosi, F., & Borghetti, C. (2021). Interlanguage analysis, formative assessment, and educational experimentation in teacher training. Revista De Italianística, 42, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-8281.i42p23-43