Dos metáforas históricas sobre el problema de la atribución de sentido
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2020.156889Palabras clave:
Sentido da ação, Teoria da escolha racional, Hermenêutica, Interdisciplinaridade, DualismoResumen
O presente artigo descreve duas grandes tendências de abordagem do problema sociológico do sentido da ação. Elas podem ser melhor compreendidas fazendo uso de duas metáforas intuitivas. Trata a primeira da “mente como um computador”, e a segunda do “mundo como um texto”. Descrevem-se de modo geral os supostos filosóficos de cada tendência e os seus principais déficits ontológicos, epistemológicos e metodológicos. Em seguida, são apresentadas as suas convergências implícitas, ilustradas em três déficits teóricos: o dualismo, o atomismo e o holismo. O artigo ressalta a importância da pesquisa interdisciplinar, incluindo nela as chamadas ciências biossociais para a superação desses déficits.
Descargas
Referencias
Agassi, Joseph. (1975), “Institutional individualism”. British Journal of Sociology, 26 (2): 144- 55.
Armstrong, David M. (1968), A materialist theory of the mind. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Arrow, Kenneth J. & Debreu, Gerard. (1954), “Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy”. Econometrica, 22: 265-290.
Axtell, Robert. (2000), Why agents? on carried motivations for agent computing in social sciences. Washington, The Brookings Institution.
Baron-Cohen, Simon. (2005), “The empathizing system: A revision of the model of mind reading system”. In: Ellis, B. & Bjorklund, D. (orgs.). Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development. Nova York, Guilford.
Baron-Cohen, Simon et al. (2000), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. Oxford, Oxford UP.
Becker, Gary S. (1964), Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Nova York, Columbia UP.
Becker, Gary S. (1976), The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Berger, Peter & Luckmann, Thomas. (1966), The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Nova York, Doubleday and Company.
Bloor, David. (1991), Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Boden, Margaret A. (2014), “Gofai”. In: Frankish, Keith & Ramsey, William (orgs.). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Boudon, Raymond. ([1992] 1995), Tratado de sociologia. Rio de Janeiro, Jorge Zahar Ed.
Boudon, Raymond. (2001), The origin of values. sociology and philosophy of beliefs. New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.
Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert. (2011), A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Brown, Richard H. (1987), Society as text. Essays on rhetoric, reason, and reality. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Brown, Richard H. (1990), “Rhetoric, textuality, and the postmodern turn in sociological theory”. Sociological Theory, 8: 188-197.
Bunge, Mario. (1996), Buscar la filosofía en las ciencias sociales. Madrid, Siglo XXI.
Bunge, Mario. (1999), Las ciencias sociales en discusión. Buenos Aires, Editorial Sudamericana.
Bunge, Mario. (2000), Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto, Toronto UP.
Bunge, Mario. (2003), Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto, Toronto UP.
Bunge, Mario. (2010), Matter and mind. Heidelberg, Londres, Nova York, Springer.
Buss, David M. (2004), Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, Pearson.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L & Feldman, Marcus W. (1981), Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Cerulo, Karen A. (1997), “Identity construction: New issues, new direction”. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 385-09.
Churchland, Patricia S & Sejnowski, Terrence J. (1993), The computational brain. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Clifford, James & Marcus, George E. (1986), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, ca, California UP.
Coase, Ronald. (1990), The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Coleman, James S. (1986), “Social theory, social research, and a theory of action”. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 1309-1335.
Coleman, James S. (1990), Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Harvard UP.
Cosmides, Leda & Tooby, John. (1987), “From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link”. In: Dupré, John (org.). The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality. Cambridge ma, mit Press.
Dawkins, Richard. (1976), The selfish gene. Oxford, Oxford UP.
De Waal, Frans. (2008), “Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy”. The Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 279-300.
Decety, Jean & Jackson, Philip L. (2006), “A social neuroscience perspective on empathy”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15: 54-58.
Dennett, Daniel. (1991), Consciousness explained. Boston, Little Brown.
Derrida, Jacques. (1967), De la grammatologie. Paris, Minuit.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. (2002), Selected Works. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Dunbar, Robin. (2009), “The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution”. Annals of Human Biology, 36 (5): 562-572.
Easterlin, Nancy. (2012), A biocultural approach to literary theory and interpretation. Baltimore, Md., John Hopkins UP.
Eco, Umberto. (1992), “Overinterpreting text”. In: Collini, S. Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
Elster, John. (1982), “The case for methodological individualism”. Theory and Society, 11 (4): 453-482.
Epstein, Joshua M. (2007), Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Fehr, Ernst & Fischbacher, Urs. (2003), “The nature of human altruism”. Nature, 425: 785-91.
Fodor, Jerry & Pylyshyn, Zenon. (1988), “Connectionism and cognitive architecture”. Cognition, 28.
Foucault, Michel. ([1966] 1984), Las palabras y las cosas. Barcelona, Planeta.
Gadamer, Hans-George. (2004 [1975]), Truth and method. Londres, Bloomsbury.
Gallistel, C. R & King, Adam P. (2009), Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Nova York, Wiley and Blackwell.
Garfinkel, Harold. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, Harold. (2002), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkeim’s aphorism. Oxford, UK, Rowman & Littlefield.
Geertz, Clifford. (1973), The interpretation of cultures. Nova York, Basic Books.
Geertz, Clifford. (1984), “Distinguished lecture: Anti anti-relativism”. American Anthropologist, 86 (2): 263-278.
Gintis, Herbert et al. (2005), Moral sentiments and material interest: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Goffman, Erving. (1967), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, Nova York, Doubleday, Anchor Books.
Goffman, Erving. (1975), Frame analysis. an essay on the organization of the experience. Massachussetts, Cambridge.
Graham, Jesse et al. (2011), “Mapping the moral domain”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101: 366-385.
Granovetter, Mark. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
Grondin, Jean. ([1991] 1994), Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. New Haven, Yale UP.
Grossberg, Lawrence. (1997), “Cultural studies, modern logics, and theories of globalization”. In: McRobbie, A. (org.). Back to reality? Social experience and cultural studies. Manchester, Manchester UP.
Habermas, Jürgen. (2010), Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madri, Trotta.
Habermas, Jürgen. (2002), Verdad y justificación. Madri, Trotta.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1988), La lógica de las ciencias sociales. Madri, Tecnos.
Haidt, Jonathan & Joseph, Craig. (2004). “Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues”. Daedalus, 4: 55-66.
Haidt, Jonathan & Joseph, Craig. (2007), “The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules”.
In: Carruthers, P. (org.). The innate mind: Vol. 3. foundations and the future. Nova York, Oxford up.
Harcourt, Bernard E. (2012), The illusion of free markets: Punishment and the myth of natural order. Cambridge, Harvard UP.
Hayek, Friedrich (1989), “The pretence of knowledge”. American Economic Review, 79: 3-7.
Hayek, Friedrich (1944), The road to serfdom. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Hebb, Donald. (1949), The organization of behavior. Nova York, Wiley.
Hechter, Michael & Opp, Karl-Dieter. (2001), Social norms. Nova York, Russell Sage Foundation.
Henrich, Joseph & McElreath, Richard. (2007), “Dual-inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution”. In: Barrett, L. & Dunbar, Robert (org.). Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford, Oxford UP.
Hernstein, Richard J. & Murray, Charles. (1994), The bell curve. Nova York, Free Press.
Hogarth, Robin M. & Reder, Melvin W. (1987), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Iacoboni, Marco. (2008), Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. Nova York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Inglehart, Ronald. (2008), “Changing values among western publics, 1970-2006: Postmaterialist values and the shift from survival values to self expression values”. West European Politics, 31(1-2): 130-146.
Inglehart, Ronald. (2018), Cultural evolution. People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
Jordan, Fiona et al. (2013), “Cultural evolution of the structure of human groups”. In: Richerson, Peter & Christiansen, Morten (orgs.). Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Kahneman, Daniel et al. (1982), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge, Cambridge up.
Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos. (1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
Kim, Jaegwon. ([1993] 2002), Supervenience and mind. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
Lewens, Tim. (2015), Cultural evolution: Conceptual challenges. Oxford, uk, Oxford UP.
Liu, Eric. & Hanauer, Nick. (2011), The gardens of democracy: A new american story of citizenship, the economy, and the role of goverment. Seattle, Sasquatch Books.
Longino, Helen. (2002), The fate of knowledge. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Lucas, Robert E. & Sargent, Thomas J. (1981), Rational expectations and econometric practice. Minneapolis, Minnesota UP.
Marcus, Gary. (2004), The birth of the mind. Nova York, Basic Books.
Marks, Jonathan. (2002), What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Los Angeles, California UP.
Mathew, Sarah et al. (2013), “Human cooperation among kin and close associates may require enforcement of norms by third parties”. In: Richerson, Peter & Christiansen, Morten (orgs.). Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
McAdams, Dan P. (2001), “The psychology of life stories”. Review of General Psychology, 5 (2): 100-122.
Moll, Jodie & Hoque, Zahirul. (2006), Rational choice theory. Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories, methods and issues. Londres, Spiramus Press.
Mouzelis, Nicos P. (1995), Sociological theory: What went wrong? Londres e Nova York, Routledge.
Nelson, Cary et al. (1992), “Cultural studies: An introduction”. In: Grossberg, Lawrence et al. Cultural studies. Nova York, Londres, Routledge.
Newell, Allen. (1982), The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18 (1): 87-127. Oppenheimer, Joe A. (2010), “Rational choice theory”. In: Bevir, M. Encyclopedia of political theory. Londres, Sage.
Phelps, Elizabeth. (2006), “Emotion and cognition”. Annual Review of Psychology, 57: 27-53.
Plutchik, Robert. (1987), “Evolutionary bases of empathy”. In: Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (orgs.). Empathy and its development. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
Polanyi, Karl et al. (1957), Trade and market in the early empires: Economies in history and theory. Nova York, Free Press.
Preston, Stephanie D. & De Waal, Frans. (2002), “Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25: 1-72.
Reynoso, Carlos. (2000), Apogeo y decadencia de los estudios culturales: Una visión antropológica. México DF, Gedisa.
Richerson, Peter & Boyd, Robert. (2005), Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Richerson, Peter & Christiansen, Morten (eds.). (2013), Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Richerson, Peter & Henrich, Joseph. (2012), “Tribal social instincts and the cultural evolution of institutions to solve collective action problems”. Cliodynamics, 3: 38-80.
Ricoeur, Paul. (1965), De l’interprétation. essai sur Freud. Paris, Seuil.
Ricoeur, Paul. (1975), “La fonction herméneutique de la distanciation”. Exegesis. Problémes De Méthode Et Exercises De Lecture. Neuchâtel, Delachaux Et Niestle, 179-200.
Ricoeur, Paul. (1977), “La structure symbolique de l’action”. Actes De La 14e Conférance Internationale De Sociologie Des Religions. Lille, Secrétariat c.i.s.r., 35.
Ricoeur, Paul. (1983), Temps et récit 1. L’intrigue et le récit historique. Paris, Seuil.
Ricoeur, Paul. ([1986] 2001), Del texto a la acción. ensayos de hermenéutica ii. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ridley, Matt. (2015), The evolution of echonomy. The evolution of everything: How new ideas emerge. Nova York, HarperCollins.
Rizzolati, Giacomo et al. (1996), “Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions”. Cognitive Brain Research, 3 (2): 131-141.
Rorty, Richard. (1981), Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Sargent, Thomas J. (1987), Macroeconomic theory. Nova York, New York Academic Press.
Schluchter, Wolfgang. (1981), The rise of western rationalism max weber’s developmental history. Berkeley; Los Angeles; Londres, University of California Press.
Schütz, Alfred. ([1932] 1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston il, Northwestern UP.
Sejnowski, Terrence et al. (1988), Computational neuroscience. Science, 241: 1299-306.
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone. (2011), “The neural bases for empathy”. Neuroscientist, 17 (1): 18-24.
Shubik, Martin. (1984), A game theoretic approach to political economy. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Shweder, Richard et al. (1987), “Culture and moral development”. In: Kagan, J & Lamb, S. (org.). The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago, Chicago UP.
Shweder, Richard et al. (1997). “The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering”. In: Brand, A. & Rozin, P. (orgs.). Morality and health. Nova York, Routledge.
Sloman, Steven & Fernbach, Philip. (2017), The knowledge illusion. Nova York, Riverhead.
Swedberg, Richard. (1994), “Markets as social structures”. In: Smelser, Neil & Swedberg, Richard (orgs.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton, Princeton UP.
Tiger, Lionel & Fox, Robin. (1971), The imperial animal. Nova York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tomasello, Michael et al. (2005), “Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 675-735.
Turchin, Peter. (2013), “The puzzle of human ultrasociety: How did large-scale complex societies evolve?”. In: Richerson, Peter & Christiansen, Morten (orgs.). Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Turchin, Peter. (2016), Ultrasociety: How 10,000 years of war made humans the greatest cooperators on earth. Chaplin, Beresta Books.
Turco, Catherine J. & Zuckerman, Ezra W. (2017), “Verstehen for sociology: Comment on Watts”. American Journal of Sociology, 122 (4): 1272-91.
Watts, Duncan J. (2014), “Common sense and sociological explanations”. American Journal of Sociology, 120: 313-51.
Weber, Max ([1913] 1992), “Essai sur quelques catégories de la sociologie compréhensive”. In: Weber, Max. Essais sur la théorie de la science. Paris, Plon.
Weber, Max. ([1922] 1984), Economía y sociedad. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Wilson, David S. (2008), “Evolution ‘for the Good of the Group’”. American Scientist, 96 (2): 380-389.
Wilson, David S. (2015), Does altruism exist? culture, genes and the welfare of others. New Haven CT, Yale UP.
Woolgar, Steve. (1986), “On the alleged distinction between discourse and praxis”. Studies of Science, 16 (2): 309-17.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Tempo Social
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
