Professional satisfaction in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6364.3895%20

Keywords:

Pandemics; Occupational Health; Job Satisfaction; Nursing Administration Research; Working Conditions; Occupational Stress

Abstract

Objective: to assess the job satisfaction of nursing professionals who worked in care and management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: cross-sectional epidemiological study, with the participation of 334 nursing professionals of a teaching hospital. Absolute and relative frequencies of qualitative variables and means of numerical variables were calculated. The mean scores of the domains of the Job Satisfaction Survey were compared with sociodemographic-labor variables. Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and ANOVA test were applied and followed by Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis, or Dunn’s post-test to verify the statistical significance of the results with a critical level of 0.05. Results: 90 professionals were satisfied with their work, three professionals were dissatisfied and 241 professionals were ambivalent. Conclusion: cambivalence was evidenced among nursing workers regarding their job satisfaction during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate a path for managers and health policymakers to invest in career plans and work environments that improve the working conditions of nursing workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-12

Issue

Vol. 31 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.
Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
 Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.

 

How to Cite

Professional satisfaction in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2023). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 31, e3895. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6364.3895