Paths taken by Brazilian Nursing for the development of terminological subsets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3132.3270Keywords:
Nursing, Classification, Terminology, Nursing Process, Nursing Research, Postgraduate Nursing EducationAbstract
Objective: to discuss the paths taken by Brazilian Nursing in the development of terminological subsets of the International Classification for Nursing Practice. Method: documentary research, carried out in master’s dissertations and doctoral theses, which developed terminological subsets, available at the Bank of Doctoral Theses and Master’s Dissertations of the Under-graduation Personnel Improvement Coordination. The variables were analyzed were institution, year; academic level, type of health service, methodological approach, clientele, theoretical reference, validation of terms, cross mapping, modeling of new concepts, validation of statements, method used for elaboration, term collection, finalization and dissemination. Results: 124 doctoral theses and master’s dissertations were found, 91 were excluded and 33 were included, 23 (69.70%) of which were master’s dissertations, with the highest production in 2014 (n=10; 30.30%), with emphasis on the Northeast (36.36%); the ‘Primary Care’ scenario, with six studies (18.18%); and the predominant clientele was cancer patients. As for the methodological characteristics, in 96% of the studies, the quantitative approach was used; in 2%, a qualitative approach; and 2% associated the quantitative and qualitative approaches. As for the type of study, 60% were methodological and 24% descriptive-exploratory, with the Horta model being the most used (36%). Conclusion: the paths are successful, yet still permeated by weaknesses in the validations and potentialities to standardize the language.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.