Women’s sexual health six months after a severe maternal morbidity event
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3500.3293%20Keywords:
Morbidity, Sexuality, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy, Postpartum Period, NursingAbstract
Objective: to investigate female sexual function in women six months postpartum and to compare sexual function among women who had and who did not have severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Method: a cross-sectional study conducted with 110 women in the postpartum period, with and without SMM. Two instruments were used, one for the characterization of sociodemographic and obstetric variables and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for sexual function. Univariate, bivariate and regression model analyses were performed. Results: FSFI scores showed 44.5% of female sexual dysfunction, of which 48.7% were among women who had SMM and 42.0% among those who had not. There were significant differences between age (P=0.013) and duration of pregnancy (P<0.001) between women with or without SMM. Among the cases of SMM, hypertensive disorders were the most frequent (83%). An association was obtained between some domains of the FSFI and the following variables: orgasm and self-reported skin color, satisfaction and length of relationship, and pain and SMM. Conclusion: white women have greater difficulty in reaching orgasm when compared to non-white women and women with more than 120 months of relationship feel more dissatisfied with sexual health than women with less time in a relationship. Women who have had some type of SMM have more dyspareunia when compared to women who have not had SMM.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.