“School of precariousness”: the production of consent to precarious work in administration internships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-07-2021-0141Keywords:
Labor Process Theory, Neo-normative Control, Internship, Work PrecariousnessAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to understand the production of consent to precarious working conditions in administration students’ internship experiences.
Study design/methodology: Thirteen students of an undergraduate program in Business Administration in a private university were interviewed. The students’ perceptions about the dynamics of the internship and their engagement in this experience were explored through thematic analysis.
Findings: Internships became more than spaces to learn about the world of work. They are also locus of professional socialization toward precarious work. The detachment of internships from their educational scope is mediated by neo-normative control mechanisms that subjectively mobilize the interns, producing the institutionalization and appreciation of the precarious experience, re-signified as something that leads to autonomy, learning, and a job position.
Practical implications: The article can help students, universities, and companies to assess the role of internships in training future professionals.
Social implications: The research problematizes the internship as a form of professional socialization toward precarious work and its detachment from the original educational purpose. The article critically contributes to the debate about current professional socialization process of young students.
Originality/value: The article highlights the subjective dimension that supports students’ consent to dysfunctional internships, discussing both the experience of work precariousness and exploitation, and the terms of the students’ engagement in such dynamics, bridging consent to neo-normative controls.
Downloads
References
Almeida, D. R. de, Lagemann, L., & Sousa, S. V. A. (2006). A Importância do Estágio Supervisionado para a Formação do Administrador. EnANPAD,30,6–8.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing The Appropriate Individual. Journal of Management Studies.
Andrade, R. C. R., & Resende, M. (2015). ASPECTOS LEGAIS DO ESTÁGIO: UMA RETROSPECTIVA HISTÓRICA. Revista Multitexto,3(1).
Antunes, R. (2018). O privilégio da Servidão: O novo proletariado de serviços na era digital (1st ed.). Boitempo.
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse Author ( s ): Stephen R. Barley and Gideon Kunda Source: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Sep., 1992), pp. 363-399 Published by. Administrative Science Quarterly,37(3),363–399.
Beckhauser, S. P. R., Souza, J. C. L. de, Parisotto, I. R. dos S., & Domingues, M. J. C. de S. (2017). Orientação de estágio em Administração: aproximando teoria e prática? Revista Brasileira de Ensino Superior, 3(1),56. https://doi.org/10.18256/2447-3944/rebes.v7n1p56-77
Bianchi, G., & Rocha-De-Oliveira, S. (2011). As representações sociais dos universitários de Administração sobre a experiência de estágio. XXXV Encontro Da ANPAD, 1–17.
Bilsland, K., & Cumbers, A. (2018). Managerial control and the limits to employee participation in retail work spaces: evidence from a UK IKEA store. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12110
Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in Qualitative Research (1o Ed). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2009). O novo espírito do capitalismo. Martins Fontes.
Bolton, S. C., & Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement. Employee Relations, 31(6),556–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450910991721
BRASIL. Presidência da República – Casa Civil. Lei nº 11.788, de 25 de setembro de 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11788.htm>.
Braverman, H. (1987). Trabalho e Capital Monopolista: A degradação do Trabalho no século XX (3a Ed). Guanabara.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
Castel, R. (1998). As metamorfoses da questão social: uma crônica do salário. Vozes.
Colombo, I. M., & Ballão, C. M. (2014). Histórico e aplicação da legislação de estágio no Brasil. Educar Em Revista, 30(53),171–186. https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/36555/23133
Druck, G. (2013). A precarização social do trabalho no Brasil: Alguns indicadores. In Antunes, R. (Ed.), A Riqueza e miséria do trabalho no Brasil II (1st ed.).Boitempo.
Eckelt, M., & Schmidt, G. (2015). Learning to be precarious - The transition of young people from school into precarious work in Germany. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 12(3),130–155.
Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2009). “Just be yourself!”: Towards neo-normative control in organisations? Employee Relations, 31(6),569–583. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450910991730
Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2011). “Being yourself” in the electronic sweatshop: New forms of normative control. Human Relations, 64(2),177–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710375481
Gomes, A. F., & Teixeira, A. S. S. (2016). Estágio Supervisionado E Aprendizagem: Contribuição Do Estágio Do Graduando De Administração Para a Formação Profissional. Revista de Carreiras e Pessoas (ReCaPe). ISSN 2237-1427,6(3). https://doi.org/10.20503/recape.v6i3.31060
Jenkins, S., & Delbridge, R. (2017). Neo-Normative Control and Value Discretion in Interactive Service Work: A Case Study. In Emerging Conceptions of Work, Management and the Labor Market (pp. 59–85). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320170000030004
Knights, D. (1990). Subjectivity, Power and the Labour Process. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory (p. 331). TIIE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD.
Knights, D., & Wilmmott, H. (1990). Labour Process Theory (D. Knights & H. Willmott (eds.)). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20466-3
Kuazaqui, E., & Volpato, L. A. (2013). Empregabilidade, empreendedorismo e estágio supervisionado. Revista Carreira & Pessoas.
Kunda, G. (1995). Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Organization Science, 6(2), 819–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279077
Lemos, A. H. da C., Silva, M. A. de C., & Serra, C. H. A. (2020). Loving one’s job: A matter of choice or subjection? German Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220952732
Leonard, P., Halford, S., & Bruce, K. (2016). ‘The New Degree?’ Constructing Internships in the Third Sector. Sociology, 50(2), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515574456
McCabe, D. (2011). Accounting for consent: Exploring the reproduction of the labour process. Sociology, 45(3),430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511399625
Melo, J. D. E., & Murari, F. (2009). O estágio e a formação de competências profissionais em estudantes de administração. Revista Gestão e Planejamento, 10(2),262–280.
O’Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. (2001). Debating Labour Process Theory. Sociology, 35, 1–29.
Perez-Zapata, O., Collado, C. C., & Alvarez-Hernández, G. (2017). Engagement y/o intensificación del trabajo ¿opción y/o obligación?: «si no haces lo que te gusta, te tiene que gustar lo que haces». Politica y Sociedad, 54(3),707–732. https://doi.org/10.5209/POSO.52176
Peticca-Harris, A., Weststar, J., & McKenna, S. (2015). The perils of project-based work: Attempting resistance to extreme work practices in video game development. Organization, 22(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415572509
Piccinini, V. C., Rocha-De-Oliveira, S., & Rübenich, N. V. (2005). Formal, Flexível ou Informal? Reflexões sobre o Trabalho no Brasil. Encontro Nacional Da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa Em Administração, Anais.
Previtali, F. S., & Fagiani, C. C. (2014). Organização e controle do trabalho no capitalismo contemporâneo: a relevância de Braverman. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 12(4),756–769. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395115088
Ribeiro, A. D. S., & Tolfo, S. da R. (2011). Estagiários, vínculos e comprometimento com as organizações concedentes de estágio. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 63(SPECIAL), 15–25.
Rocha-De-Oliveira, S., & Piccinini, V. (2012a). A construção do mercado de estágios em administração na cidade de Porto Alegre. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração,6(4), 29–48.
Rocha-de-oliveira, S., & Piccinini, V. C. (2012b). Uma análise sobre a inserção profissional de estudantes de administração no Brasil. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 13(2),6301–6301.
Santana, F. S., & Cardoso, A. L. J. (2018). A contribuição do estágio supervisionado na formação de administradores. Revista Pretexto, 19(1),90–109. https://doi.org/10.21714/pretexto.v19i1.4955
Thompson, P., & Broek, D. von den. (2010). Managerial control and workplace regimes: An introduction. Work, Employment and Society, 24(3),1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010384546
Weiskopf, R., & Loacker, B. (2018). “A snake’s coils are even more intricate than a mole’s burrow.” Individualization and Subjectification in Post-disciplinary Regimes of Work. Management Revue, 17(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2006-4-395
