Legal mechanisms of patient safety: Rethinking the legal framework of the theme in Brazil

Authors

  • Aline Albuquerque Universidade de Brasília
  • Arthur Regis Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i3p3-25

Keywords:

Damages, Patient’s Rights, Adverse Events, Civil Liability, Patient’s Safety

Abstract

The judicialization of medicine is a growing phenomenon in Brazil. There is a gradual increase in suits against physicians as a result of adverse events. This article aimed to identify and synthesize the legal mechanisms adopted by different countries to deal with issues related to patient safety and harm to patients due to health care. Considering the assumptions previously established in this article and its scope, the following mechanisms were categorized: (i) mechanisms on extrajudicial solution of conflicts in health care; (ii) mechanisms on patient complaint system; (iii) mechanisms on compensation of damages without fault or administrative; and (iv) mechanisms on disclosure and apologies. It is a theoretical and documentary study, based on the specialized literature on each of the subjects covered by the mechanisms and the European Union’s Report on Patients’ Rights, (2016). It was concluded that the fact that the Brazilian model is based on the judicialization of Medicine leads to the weakening of the bonds of trust established between health professional and patient. Also, it contributes to the expenditure of excessive material and human resources on the part of the State and the parties involved in the legal proceedings without guaranteeing the corresponding satisfaction of the same with the result of the judicial action. In addition, because of judicial actions, the systemic improvement of the quality of health services is not yet achieved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Aline Albuquerque, Universidade de Brasília

    Post-doctorate in Human Rights at the Human Rights Centre at University of Essex (England); post-doctorate in Health and Human Rights at the Institute of Human Rights at Emory University (United States). Accredited Professor of the Post-Graduation in Bioethics from the Universidade de Brasília (UnB).

  • Arthur Regis, Universidade de Brasília

    Doctorate and Masters in Bioethics from the Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Lawyer.

References

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA - ANVISA. Plano Integrado para a Gestão Sanitária da Segurança do Paciente em Serviços de Saúde. Monitoramento e Investigação de Eventos Adversos e Avaliação de Práticas de Segurança do Paciente. Brasília-DF, 2015. Disponível em: file:///C:/Users/Samsung/Downloads/PLANO_INTEGRADO.pdf. Acesso em: 21 maio 2018.

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA - ANVISA. Série: Segurança do Paciente e Qualidade em Serviços de Saúde. Disponível em: https://proqualis.net/. Acesso em: 21 maio 2018.

ALBUQUERQUE, Aline. Direitos humanos dos pacientes. Curitiba: Juruá, 2016.

APOLOGY laws: talking to patients about adverse events. Medical Economics, June, 10 2014. Disponível em: https://www.medicaleconomics.com/articles/apology-laws-talking-patientsabout-adverse-events. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.

BIANCHI, Fernando. Crescimento das ações judiciais e reclamações éticas contra médicos. O Estado de S. Paulo, São Paulo, 21 out. 2017. Disponível em: https://politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/crescimento-das-acoes-judiciais-e-reclamacoes-eticas-contra-medicos/.Acesso em: 31 out. 2018.

CARE QUALITY COMMISSION. Regulation 20: Duty of candour. Disponível em: https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/regulations-enforcement/regulation-20-duty-candour. Acesso em: 29 out. 2018.

COMMOWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Australian Open Disclosure Framework Better communication: a better way to care. Disponível em: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Australian-Open-Disclosure-Framework-Feb-2014.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2018.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Patients’ Rights in the European Union Mapping eXercise. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016.

EUROPEAN COUNCIL. Council Recommendation of 9 June 2009 on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections (2009/C 151/01). Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/2_June_2009%20patient%20safety.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.

FARIA, Paula Lobato; MOREIRA, Pedro Sá; PINTO, Laura Souza. Direito e segurança do paciente. In: SOUSA, Paulo; MENDES, Walter (Orgs.). Segurança do paciente: conhecendo os riscos nas organizações da saúde. Rio de Janeiro: EAD/ENSP, 2014. p. 115-134.

FRANCIS, R. Report of the mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry. London: The Stationary Office, 2013.

GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL. Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour 2015. Disponível em: https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/nmcpublications/openness-and-honesty-professional-duty-of-candour.pdf. Acesso em: 29 out. 2018.

GOODMAN, Ryan; JINKS, Derek. Socializing states. Oxford: Oxford, 2013.

GOVERNMENT OF THE NETHERLANDS. Healthcare Quality, Complaints and Disputes Act (WKKGZ). Disponível em: https://www.government.nl/topics/quality-of-healthcare/healthcare-quality-complaints-and-disputes-act-wkkgz. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.

GUILLOD, Olivier. Medical error disclosure and patient safety: legal aspects. J Public Health Res., v. 2, n. 3, e31, Dec. 2013. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147746/pdf/jphr-2013-3-e31.pdf. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2013.e31.

HARRISON, Reema; BIRKS, Yvonne; BOSANQUET, Kate; IEDEMA, Rick. Enacting open disclosure in the UK National Health Service: a qualitative exploration. J Eval Clin Pract. V. 23, n. 4, p. 713-718, Feb. 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12702.

HOFMARCHER, Maria M. Austria: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, v. 15, n. 7, p. 1-291, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/233414/HiT-Austria.pdf. Acesso em: 29 out. 2018.

HOSPITAL SÍRIO-LIBANÊS. Relatório de Sustentabilidade. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.hospitalsiriolibanes.org.br/institucional/relatorio-sustentabilidade/Documents/relatorio-deustentabilidade-2018.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.

INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS DE SAÚDE SUPLEMENTAR - IESS. II Anuário da Segurança Assistencial Hospitalar no Brasil: propondo as prioridades nacionais. Belo Horizonte, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.iess.org.br/cms/rep/Anuario2018.pdf. Acesso em: 21 maio 2018.

JUDICIALIZAÇÃO da saúde no Brasil em números. Ipog Blog, 20 nov. 2017. Disponível em: https://blog.ipog.edu.br/saude/judicializacao-da-sade-em-numeros/. Acesso em: 29 out. 2018.

LEE, Michael J. On patient safety: do you say “I’m sorry” to patients? Clin Orthop Relat Res., v. 474, n. 11, p. 2359-2361, Nov. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5025-7.

LUCENA FILHO, Humberto Lima de. A cultura da litigância e o Poder Judiciário: noções sobre as práticas demandistas a partir da justiça brasileira. Disponível em: http://www.publicadireito.com.br/artigos/?cod=84117275be999ff5. Acesso em: 29 out. 2018.

MAcDONALD, Noni; ATTARAN, Amir. Medical errors, apologies and apology laws. CMAJ, v. 180, n. 1, p. 11, Jan. 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081997.

MELLO, Michelle M.; CHANDRA, Amitabh; GAWANDE, Atul A.; STUDDERT, David M. National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff (Millwood), v. 29, n. 9, p. 1569–1577, sep. 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0807.

MELLO, Michelle M.; KACHALIA, Allen Kachalia; STUDDERT, David M. Medical liability: prospects for Federal Reform. Disponível em: https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/nejmp1701174.pdf. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2017.

MENDES, Walter. Taxonomia em segurança do paciente. In: SOUSA, Paulo; MENDES, Walter (Orgs.). Segurança do paciente: conhecendo os riscos nas organizações da saúde. Rio de Janeiro: EAD/ENSP, 2014. p. 57-72.

MIRZOEV, Tolib; KANE, Sumit. Key strategies to improve systems for managing patient complaints within health facilities – what can we learn from the existing literature? Global Health Action, v. 11, n. 1, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1458938.

MOLVEN, Olav. The patient’s rights to complain, handling complaints, and sanctions against healthcare providers. In: MOLVEN, Olav; FERKIS, Julia (Eds.). Healthcare, welfare and law. Oslo: Gyldendal, 2010. p. 150-164.

MONTIJO, Mark et al. Bridging physician-patient perspectives following an adverse medical outcome. The Permanent Journal, v. 15, n. 4, p. 85-88, 2011.

PANELLA, Massimiliano et al. Prevalence and costs of defensive medicine: a national survey of Italian physicians. J Health Serv Res Policy, v. 22, n. 4, p. 211-217, Oct. 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819617707224.

PROQUALIS - Centro Colaborador para a Qualidade do Cuidado e a Segurança do Paciente. Taxonomia. Classificação Internacional para Segurança do Paciente (ICPS).

Organização Mundial de Saúde. Disponível em: https://proqualis.net/aula/taxonomiaclassifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o-internacional-para-seguran%C3%A7a-do-paciente-icps. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.

RÅBERUS, Anna; HOLMSTRÖM, Inger K.; GALVIN, Kathleen; SUNDLER, Annelie J. The nature of patient complaints: a resource for healthcare improvements. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, v. 31, n. 7, p. 556-562, Aug. 2019.

READER, Tom W.; GILLESPIE, Alex; ROBERTS, Jane. Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Quality & Safe, v. 23, n. 8, p. 678-689, Aug. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437.

SANTOS, Margarida Custódio; GRILO, Ana Monteiro. Envolvimento do paciente: desafios, estratégias e limites. In: SOUSA, Paulo; MENDES, Walter (Orgs.). Segurança do paciente: conhecendo os riscos nas organizações da saúde. Rio de Janeiro: EAD/ENSP, 2014. p. 159-186.

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH. The Report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Learning from Bristol. Disponível em: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090811143822/http://www.bristolinquiry.org.uk/final_report/the_report.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2018.

SEKHAR, M Sonal; VYAS, N. Defensive Medicine: A Bane to Healthcare. Ann Med Health Sci Res., v. 3, n. 2, p. 295-296, abr./jun. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.113688.

SOHN, David H. Negligence, genuine error, and litigation. International Journal of General Medicine, n. 6, p. 49-56, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S24256.

UNITED KINGDOM - UK. National Health Service – NHS. Litigation Authority. Disponível em: http://www.nhsla.com/Pages/Home.aspx. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2017.

UNITED KINGDOM - UK. National Health Service – NHS. Redress Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/44/pdfs/ukpga_20060044_en.pdf.

UNITED KINGDOM - UK. The National Health Service - NHS. Compensation Act 2006. Disponível em: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/29/pdfs/ukpga_20060029_en.pdf. Acesso em: 2 dez. 2017.

Published

12/20/2020

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Albuquerque, A., & Regis, A. (2020). Legal mechanisms of patient safety: Rethinking the legal framework of the theme in Brazil. Journal of Health Law, 20(3), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i3p3-25