From Conditioning to Expression: investigating the roots of aesthetic creation in associative learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2596-2477.i52p67-83Keywords:
Creativity, Aesthetic Expression, Learning, Association, GestaltAbstract
This essay explores the intersection between associative learning and the aesthetic process of creation. Beginning with a brief discussion on associationism, it presents the philosophical roots that underpin the understanding of the human mind, from the ideas of Immanuel Kant, David Hume, and John Locke to the contributions of Gustav Theodor Fechner and other contemporary figures in psychology and neuroscience. It considers how the principles of Gestalt and Connectionism are explored in relation to aesthetic preference. Thus, it discusses the fundamentals of associative learning, highlighting how its processes are shaped by individual experience and cultural influences that can also affect collective critical thinking, traversing various knowledge approaches. It concludes that such aesthetic preferences result from a complex interaction between cognitive processes, individual experiences, and cultural influences, shaped over time by both reason and emotion.
Downloads
References
BENJAMIN, R. Assessing risk, automating racism. Science, v. 366, n. 6464, p. 421–422, 2019. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz3873.
BUCKNER, C.; GARSON, J. Connectionism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2019. Disponible en: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/connectionism/. Acceso en: 03 abr. 2024.
CAMARGO, P. S.; HELENE, A. F. Treino Imaginativo: a imaginação como estratégia inovadora de aprendizagem de ações motoras. Revista de Neurociências e Comportamento, 2, p. 77-108, 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10815639.
COREN, S.; GIRGUS, J. S. Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the gestalt illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(3), p. 404–412, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.6.3.404.
CUPCHIK, G. C. et al. Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), p. 8–-91, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003.
DEWEY, J. How we think. Boston: D. C. Health & Company, 1910.
FECHNER, G. T. Some thoughts on the psychophysical representation of memories (1882). Psychological Research, 49(4), p. 209–212, 1987. DOI: 10.1007/BF00309028.
GRAHAM, D. W. “Heraclitus”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.). 2023. Disponible en: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/heraclitus/>. Acceso en: 3 abr. 2024.
LAKOFF, G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: ORTONY, A., ed. Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
LORRAIN, F.; WHITE, H. C. Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), p. 49-80, 1971. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989788.
MANDELBAUM, E. Associationist Theories of Thought. In ZALTA, E. N. & NODELMAN, U. (Eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022. Disponible en: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/associationist-thought/. Acceso en: 28. jun. 2024.
MATAMOROS-FERNÁNDEZ, A. Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), p. 930-946, 2017. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130.
MCMANUS, I. C.; COOK, R.; HUNT, A. Beyond the golden section and normative aesthetics: why do individuals differ so much in their aesthetic preferences for rectangles? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), p. 113–126, 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017316.
ORTLIEB, S. A.; KÜGEL, W. A.; CARBON, C. C. Fechner (1866): The aesthetic association principle—A commented translation, i-Perception, v. 11, n. 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520920309. Acceso en: 28 jun. 2024.
ROBSON, J.; CURRIE, G. Aesthetics and cognitive science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. Disponible en: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/aesthetics-cogsci/>. Acceso en: 03 abr. 2024.
SEIXAS, R. Trem das 7. Phillips Records, 1974. Disponible en: <https://www.letras.mus.br/raul-seixas/48335/>. Acceso en: 3 de abril de 2024.
WARD, J. F. Arthur F. Bentley's philosophy of social science. American Journal of Political Science, p. 595–608, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18761/pac.2015.032.
YOUNG, S. B. King Arthur and the Heroic Pattern. Deering High School, Portland, ME, 2009. Disponible en: <https://steinbeck.stanford.edu/arthur>. Acceso en: 3 abr. 2024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Natali L. Nascimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.