Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Individual Lifestyle Profile (ILP) questionnaire for individuals with musculoskeletal pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18007426012019Keywords:
Reproducibility of Results, Musculoskeletal Pain, LifestyleAbstract
The aim of this study was to test all the reliability properties of the Individual Lifestyle Profile (ILP) in patients with musculoskeletal pain. A total of 105 patients with musculoskeletal pain participated in this study after being recruited from a public secondary physical therapy care. ILP was applied by Rater 1 at the initial assessment and by Rater 2 after one hour. After three to seven days of the initial assessment, Rater 1 reapplied ILP. ILP and its components showed internal consistency from 0.27 to 0.61 and intra- and inter-rater reliability values from moderate to excellent (ICC=0.68 to 0.90) and from moderate to almost perfect (K=0.59 to 0.83). Percent agreement was 61% to 98%, the SEM of ILP was 4.1 points and the MDC was 5.7 points. We conclude that ILP is a reliable instrument to assess the lifestyle of patients with musculoskeletal pain.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Envelhecimento ativo: uma política
de saúde. Brasília, DF: Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde;
[cited 2016 Jul 18]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.
gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/envelhecimento_ativo.pdf
Both J, Borgatto AF, Nascimento JV, Sonoo CN, Lemos
CAF, Nahas MV. Validação da escala “Perfil do estilo de vida
individual”. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2008;13(1):5-14. DOI:
12820/rbafs.v.13n1p5-14
Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM,
Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal health conditions represent
a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World
Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health.
Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):243–55. DOI: 10.1093/geront/
gnw002.
Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal
conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):646-56.
Rasker JJ. Rheumatology in general practice. Br J Rheumatol.
;34(6):494-7. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.6.494
Knittle K, De Gucht V, Maes S. Lifestyle- and behaviour-change
interventions in musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin
Rheumatol. 2012;26(3):293-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2012.05.002
Dean E, Söderlund A. What is the role of lifestyle behaviour
change associated with non-communicable disease risk in
managing musculoskeletal health conditions with special
reference to chronic pain? BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
;16(1):87. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0545-y
Farias GO, Both J, Folle A, Pinto MG, Nascimento JV. Satisfação
no trabalho de professores de educação física do magistério
público municipal de Porto Alegre. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov.
;23(3):5-13. DOI: 10.18511/0103-1716/rbcm.v23n3p5-13
Martins GH, Martins RDS, Prates MEF, Martins GC. Análise dos
parâmetros de qualidade e estilo de vida de universitários. Rev
Mackenzie Educ Fís Esporte. 2012;11(1):22-30.
Monteiro KRS, Abbes P. Estilo de vida dos atletas do campeonato
amazonense adulto de futsal. Bol Inf Unimotrisaúde
Sociogerontol. 2016;7(3):3-16.
Motela T, Vargas LM, Hauser MW. Percepção de bem-estar: um
estudo com operadores de empilhadeira de uma indústria de
Ponta Grossa/PR. Rev Eletrônica Fafit/Facic. 2013;4(1):1-9.
Hernandez JAE, Neto FXV, Oliveira TC, Rodrigues AA, Neto
CHE, Voser RC. Validação de construto do instrumento Perfil
do Estilo de Vida Individual. Arq Mov. 2007;3(1):3-17.
Silveira PM, Borgatto AF, Andrade DF, Both J, Nascimento JV.
Escala de avaliação do perfil do estilo de vida por meio da teoria
da resposta ao item. Rev Educ Fís/UEM. 2015;26(4):519-27.
DOI: 10.4025/reveducfis.v26i4.24996
Nahas MV, Barros MVG, Francalacci V. O pentáculo do bemestar – base conceitual para avaliação do estilo de vida de
indivíduos ou grupos. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2000;5(2):48-
DOI: 10.12820/rbafs.v.5n2p48-59
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, Vet
HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews
of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for
the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-7. DOI:
1007/s11136-011-9960-1
Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ,
Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and
Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Study.
;48(6):661-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
Hill MM, Hill A. Investigação por Questionário. Lisboa: Silabo.2000.
Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurement. The design and analysis
of clinical experiments. Canada, CA: John Wiley & Sons. 1986.
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710300308
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies:
use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther.
;85(3):257-68. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.3.257
Añez CRR, Reis RS, Petroski EL. Versão brasileira do questionário
“Estilo de Vida Fantástico”: tradução e validação para adultos
jovens. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008;91(2):102-9. DOI: 10.1590/
S0066-782X2008001400006
World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical
Activity and Health. Switzerland, CH: WHO Library Cataloguingin-Publication Data. 2010;60 [cited 2016 Jul 18]. Available from:
http://www.who.int/nmh/wha/59/dpas/en/
Peng MW. Global Strategy. 3. ed. United States of America,
USA: Cengage Learning. 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
