Effects of cathode and anode of the direct current on changes in palmar grip strength: assessment through a dynamometry

Authors

  • Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz Universidad Andrés Bello. Chile. Chile
  • Jaime Opazo Universidad Andrés Bello. Chile
  • Iván Romero Poblete Asociación Nacional de Fútbol Amateur
  • José Mora Santis Centro Clínico FISIOMO S.A

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17460125012018

Keywords:

Randomized Controlled Trial, Hand Strength, Electric Stimulation Therapy

Abstract

This study objective is to investigate the polar effects of the direct current on muscular strength, evaluated by the manual dynamometer. The values of muscle strength, in kilograms, were compared before and after the procedure in the 3 groups (Anode, Cathode and Control). The project is a controlled randomized clinical trial, which was performed at the Laboratory of Physiotherapy of the University Andrés Bello (Physioterpy Carrer) with 150 healthy voluntary participants. The intervention consisted on the application of a direct current session with intensity of 2mA for 12 minutes, with an electrode of 48cm2 (dose of 24mA×min and current density of 0.04mA/cm2). The difference between the groups was in the stimulus with the cathode or the anode, and the application of the current was performed after the initial dynamometric evaluation. The main measured variable was the difference of maximum force of palmar grip (Kg), which was obtained through the difference between the best value of maximum pre-intervention force and the best value of maximum post-intervention force. The results indicate that there were no statistically significant changes in the intervention groups (p value=0.88) when comparing the maximum strength differences (FMdif). However, a slight improvement in strength was observed when comparing the groups only considering men from the cathode group (p value=0.94), and a slight decrease when comparing only women from the anode group (p value=0.91). It was concluded that, apparently, the direct current would not generate greater changes in the force of manual grasp after an intervention session on the forearm. Nevertheless, there are positive variations of strength in men from the cathode group, and negative ones in women from the anode group when analyzed independently, although these modifications are not statistically significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cameron MH, organizadora. Physical agents in rehabilitation:

from research to practice. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013.

Part IV, Electrical currents; p. 223-39.

Martin JMR. Electroterapia en fisioterapia. 3ª ed. Madrid:

Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2013. Capítulo VI,

Aplicaciones y tratamiento con galvanismo; p. 181-204.

Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug

delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):619-58. doi:

1016/j.addr.2003.10.026

Kahn J. Iontophoresis. Phys Ther. 1984:64(6):956-9.

Conjeevaram R, Banga AK, Zhang L. Electrically modulated

transdermal delivery of fentayl. Pharm Res. 2002;19(4):440-

doi: 10.1023/A:1015135426838

Guy RH, Delgado-Charro MB, Kalia YN. Iontophoretic

transport across the skin. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol.

;14 Supl 1:35-40. doi: 10.1159/000056388

Hamann H, Hodges M, Evans B. Effectiveness of

iontophoresis of antiinflammatory medications in the

treatment of common musculoskeletal inflammatory

conditions: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2006;11(3):190-4.

doi: 10.1179/108331906x144082

Li CL, Scudds RA, Heck CS, Harth M. The efficacy of

dexamethasone iontophoresis for the treatment of

rheumatoid arthritic knees: a pilot study. Arthritis Care Res.

;9(2):126-32.

Donaldson PH., Kirkovski M, Rinehart NJ, Enticott PG.

Autism-relevant traits interact with temporoparietal

junction stimulation effects on social cognition: a highdefinition transcranial direct current stimulation and

electroencephalography study. Eur J Neurosci. 2017 set.

:[13 p.]. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13675

Fan J, Li Y, Yang Y, Qu Y, Li S. Efficacy of noninvasive brain

stimulation on unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic

review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 set.

doi: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000834

Morillo MM, Vega JMP, Portero FS. Manual de medicina física.

San Diego: Harcourt Brace; 1998. p. 68-150.

Plaja J. Guía práctica de electroterapia. Barcelona:

Electromedicarin; 1998. p. 9-27.

Fujita M, Hukuda S, Doida Y. The effect of constant direct

electrical current on intrinsic healing in the flexor tendon

in vitro. An ultraestructural study of differing attitudes

in epitenon cells and tenocytos. J Hand Surg Eur Vol.

;17(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90021-s

Petelenz TJ, Buttke C, Bonds LB, Lloyd JE, Beck RL,

Stephens SC. Iontophoresis o dexametasone: laboratory

studies. J Control Release. 1992;20(1):55-66. doi:

1016/0168-3659(92)90139-i

Benjamin SJ, Flood JN, Bechtel R, Alon G. Measurement

of soft tissue temperature and impedance following the

appliation of transdermal direct currect. Physiotherapy.

;93(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2006.11.008

O’Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR,

An KN. The relationship between wrist position, grasp size,

and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17(1):169-77. doi:

1016/0363-5023(92)90136-d

Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: a review of the

literature. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46(3):120-40. doi:

1046/j.1440-1630.1999.00182.x

Bellace JV, Healy D, Besser MP, Byron T, Hohman L. Validity

of the Dexter evaluation system’s Jamar dynamometer

attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in normal

population. J Hand Ther. 2000:13(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/

S0894-1130(00)80052-6

Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Sydall H, Cooper

C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in

clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised

approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/

ageing/afr051

Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability

and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand

Surg. 1984;9(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-x

The European project Surface EMG for non-invasive

assessment of muscles (SENIAM) [homepage na Internet].

[local desconhecido]: Seniam; [s.d.][citado em 2018 fev 7].

Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/DgZa41>.

Salmons SJ, Henriksson J. The adaptive response of skeletal

muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve. 1981;4(2):94-105. doi:

1002/mus.880040204

Bigland-Ritchie B, Woods JJ. Changes in muscle contractile

properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue.

Muscle Nerve. 1984;7(9):691-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880070902

Currier DP, Mann R. Muscular strength development by

electrical stimulation in healthy individuals. Phys Ther.

;63(6):915-21. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.6.915

Mialich MS, Martinez EZ, Jordão Junior AA. Application of

body mass index adjusted for fat mass (BMIfat) obtained by

bioelectrical impedance in adults. Nutr Hosp. 2014;30(2):417-

doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.30.2.7242

Popp KL, Hughes JM, Martinez-Betancourt A, Scott

M, Turkington V, Caksa S, et al. Bone mass, microarchitecture

and strength are influenced by race/ethnicity in young

adult men and women. Bone. 2017;103:200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.

bone.2017.07.014

Morimoto A, Suga T, Tottori N, Wachi M, Misaki J, Tsuchikane

R, et al. Association between hand muscle thickness and

whole-body skeletal muscle mass in healthy adults: a pilot

study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(9):1644-8. doi: 10.1589/

jpts.29.1644

Neumann S, Kwisda S, Krettek C, Gaulke R. Comparison

of the grip strength using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the

JAMAR-dynamometer: establishment of normal values. In

Vivo. 2017;31(5):917-24.

Published

2018-04-04

Issue

Section

Revisão Sistemática

How to Cite

Effects of cathode and anode of the direct current on changes in palmar grip strength: assessment through a dynamometry. (2018). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 25(1), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17460125012018