Social origin, language skills and scientific publication patterns in Argentina, Brazil and Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2022.193439Keywords:
Linguistic skills, Scientific publication, Social origin, Argentina, Brazil, ChileAbstract
This article analyzes the conditions of acquisition of linguistic competence in the English language and the use of foreign languages in the publications of researchers from Argentina, Brazil and Chile. The analysis is based on the results of a cross-national survey carried out on samples of the researchers most integrated into the central nucleus of the scientific system of each country. In relation to the main focus of the article, the modalities of acquisition of linguistic competence
and its relationship with sociodemographic factors, such as social origin, and with the educational
trajectory are addressed. On the other hand, the association between linguistic competence and scientific publication, and the place of scientific disciplines in the use of foreign languages are analyzed. The results show that there is a connection between social origin, educational trajectory, ways of acquiring English skills and the level of these skills. However, and regardless of their
linguistic proficiency, the majority of researchers in the three countries publish in English and, in any case, their level of competence has an impact on writing strategies (whether autonomous, collaborative or mediated by professional translation). In comparative terms, Brazilian scientists publish the most in English, although in the Chilean case the lower proportion of publications in this language could be due to the greater weight of social and human scientists in the sample, since, in these disciplines, at least in Latin America, English has not acquired a lingua franca status equivalent to that of the natural sciences.
Downloads
References
Baranger, Denis & Beigel, Fernanda. (2021), “La publication en Ibéro-Amérique en tant que mode d’internationalisation des chercheurs en sciences humaines et sociales du Conicet (Argentine)”. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances [En ligne], 15 (3).
Baranger, Denis & Niño, Fernanda. (e/p), “El espacio de las disciplinas sociales en el Conicet”. In: Piovani, Juan Ignacio et al. (orgs.). Las ciencias sociales en la Argentina contemporánea. Santa Fé, Ediciones UNL – Clacso.
Beigel, Fernanda. (2014), “Introduction: Current tensions and trends in the World Scientific System”. Current Sociology, 62 (5): 617-625.
Beigel, Fernanda. (2017), “Científicos periféricos, entre Ariel y Calibán. Saberes institucionales y circuitos de consagración en Argentina: Las publicaciones de los investigadores del Conicet”. Dados: Revista de Ciências Sociais 60 (3): 825-865.
Borges, Rovênia Amorim & Garcia-Filice, Renísia Cristina. (2016), “A língua inglesa no Programa Ciência sem Fronteiras: paradoxos na política de internacionalização”. Interfaces Brasil/Canadá. 16 (1) : 72-101.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (2001), Science de la science et réflexivité. París, Seuil.
Butler, Yuko Goto & Le, Vi-Nhuan. (2018), “A longitudinal investigation of parental social-economic status (ses) and young students’ learning of English as a foreign language”. System 73: 4-15, abril.
Collyer, Fran. (2018), “Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South”. Current Sociology, 66 (1): 56-73.
Danell, Rickard. (2013), “Geographical diversity and changing communication regimes. A study of publication activity and international citation patterns”. In: Danell, Rickard et al. (orgs.). Social science in context: Historical, sociological, and global perspectives. Lund, Nordic Academic Press.
Finardi, Kyria Rebeca & França, Claudio. (2016), “O inglês na internacionalização da produção científica brasileira: evidências da subárea de Linguagem e Linguística”. Intersecções, 9 (2): 234-250.
Fiorin, José Luiz. (2007), “Internacionalização da produção científica: a publicação de trabalhos de Ciências Humanas e Sociais em periódicos internacionais”. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, 4 (8): 263-281.
Gantman, Ernesto. (2011), “La productividad científica argentina en ciencias sociales: economía, psicología, sociología y ciencia política en el Conicet (2004-2008)”. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 34 (3): 408-425.
Gantman, Ernesto. (2012), “Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries.” Scientometrics, 93 (3), 967-985.
Gantman, Ernesto & Fernández Rodríguez, Carlos J. (2016), “Literature segmentation in management and organization studies: The case of Spanish-speaking countries (2000-10)”. Research Evaluation, 25 (4), 461-471.
Geertz, Clifford. (1994), Conocimiento local. Ensayos sobre la interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona, Paidós.
Gibert Galassi, Jorge. (2013), Autonomía y dependencia en las ciencias sociales latinoamericanas: un estudio de bibliometría, epistemología y política. Buenos Aires, Clacso.
Gingras, Yves & Mosbah-Natanson, Sébastien. (2010), “Where are social sciences produced?”. In: World social science report. Knowledge divides. Paris, Unesco.
Hanafi, Sari. (2011), “University systems in the Arab East: Publish globally and perish locally vs publish locally and perish globally”. Current Sociology, 59 (3), 291-309.
Heilbron, Johan. (2014), “The social sciences as an emerging global field”. Current Sociology, 62 (5): 685-703.
Heilbron, Johan & Bokobza, Anaïs. (2015), “Transgresser les frontières en sciences humaines et sociales en France”. Arss, 215: 108-121.
Kaplan, Carina & Piovani, Juan Ignacio. (2018), “Capitales y trayectorias socioeducativas”. In: Piovani, Juan Ignacio & Salvia, Agustín (orgs.). La Argentina en el siglo xxi. Cómo somos, vivimos y convivimos en una sociedad desigual. Buenos Aires, Siglo Veintiuno.
Madeira, Rafael Machado & Marenco, André. (2016), “Os desafios da internacionalização: mapeando dinâmicas e rotas da circulação internacional”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 19: 47-74.
Mosbah-Natanson, Sébastien & Gingras, Yves. (2014), “The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980-2009)”. Current Sociology 62 (5): 626-646.
Ortiz, Renato. (2009), La supremacía del inglés en las ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires, Siglo Veintiuno.
Phillipson, Robert. (1992), Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, Robert. (2013), “Linguistic imperialism”. In: Chapelle, Carol A. (org.). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester, Wiley.
Piovani, Juan Ignacio. (2019), “Styles of academic production in the Argentine social sciences: heterogeneity and heterodoxy”. Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and the History of the Social Sciences, 4 (1-2): 27-48.
Sayer, Peter. (2018), “Does English really open doors? Social class and English teaching in public primary schools in Mexico”. System, 73: 58-70.
Shin, Hye Won & So, Youngsoon. (2018), “The moderating role of socioeconomic status on motivation of adolescents’ foreign language learning strategy use”. System, 73: 71-79.
Smala, Simone et al. (2013), “Languages, cultural capital and school choice: distinction and second-language immersion programmes”. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34 (3): 373-391.
Tsiplakides, Iakovos. (2018), “Shadow education and social class inequalities in secondary education in Greece: the case of teaching English as a foreign language”. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 7 (1): 71-93.
Vessuri, Hebe et al. (2014), “Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development”. Current Sociology, 62 (5): 647-665.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Juan Ignacio Piovani, Ana Maria Almeida, Denis Baranger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.