Social desirability bias in qualitative health research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004164Keywords:
Qualitative Research, Bias, Social Desirability, Methodology, Public Health Systems ResearchAbstract
The objective of this essay is to discuss the social desirability bias in qualitative health research. The social desirability bias consists of a systematic research error, in which the participant presents answers that are more socially acceptable than their true opinions or behaviors. Qualitative studies are very susceptible to this type of bias, which can lead to distorted conclusions about the studied phenomenon. Initially, I present the theoretical-conceptual aspects of the social desirability bias. I discuss how its occurrence can be intentional or unintentional, with a distinction between the concepts of self-deception and impression management. Then, I discuss the determining factors of this bias from four dimensions: study design; study context; interviewee's characteristic; interviewer's posture. Finally, I present a systematization of six strategies to be used by qualitative researchers for identifying and controlling social desirability bias.
References
Norris N. Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educ Action Res. 1997;5(1):172-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200020
Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:211-7. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
Galdas P. Revisiting bias in qualitative research: reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691774899. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992
Gerhard T. Bias: considerations for research practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(22):2159-68. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070369
Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(9):1212-22 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
Roulston K, Shelton SA. Reconceptualizing bias in teaching qualitative research methods. Qual Inq. 2015;21(4):332-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563803
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ. 1982;30(4):233-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
Deslandes SF, Assis SG. Abordagens quantitativa e qualitativa em saúde: o diálogo das diferenças. In: Minayo MCS, Deslandes SF, organizadoras. Caminhos do pensamento: epistemologia e método. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2002. p. 195-227.
Trad LAB. Trabalho de campo, narrativa e produção de conhecimento na pesquisa etnográfica contemporânea: subsídios ao campo da saúde. Cienc Saude Colet. 2012;17(3):627-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300008
Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1(2):13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
Ezzy D. Are qualitative methods misunderstood? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(4):294-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00582.x
Graeff TR. Response bias. In: Kempf-Leonard K, editor. Encyclopedia of social measurement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2005. p.411-18.
Kaminska O, Foulsom T: Understanding sources of social desirability bias in different modes: evidence from eye tracking. Colchester (UK): Institute for Social and Economic Research; 2013 [citado 5 ago 2021]. (ISER Working Paper Series; 2013-04). Disponível em: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/workingpapers/iser/2013-04
Kühne S. From strangers to acquaintances? Interviewer continuity and socially desirable responses in panel surveys. Surv Res Methods. 2018;12(2):121-46. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i2.7299
Bergen N, Labonté R. "Everything is perfect, and we have no problems": detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
Nederhof AJ. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1985;15(3):263-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2013;47(4):2025-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Paulhus DL. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1984;46(3):598-609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
Minayo MCS, Costa AP. Fundamentos teóricos das técnicas de investigação qualitativa. Rev Lusófona Educ. 2018 [citado 8 ago 2021];40(40):139-53. Disponível em: https://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/rleducacao/article/view/6439
Trad LAB. Grupos focais: conceitos, procedimentos e reflexões baseadas em experiências com o uso da técnica em pesquisas de saúde. Physis. 2009;19(3):777-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312009000300013
Barbour R, Flick. Grupos focais. Porto Alegre, RS; Artmed; 2009.
Flick U. Desenho na pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed; 2009.
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. Sampling designs in qualitative research: making the sampling process more public. Qual Rep. 2007;12(2):238-54. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636
Grimm P. Social desirability bias. In: Sheth JN, Malhotra NK, editors. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. John Wiley; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
Gomes MHA, Silveira C. Sobre o uso de métodos qualitativos em Saúde Coletiva, ou a falta que faz uma teoria. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46(1):160-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102012000100020
Campos RTO, Furtado JP. Narrativas: utilização na pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(6):1090-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102008005000052
Scott K, Ummer O, LeFevre AE. The devil is in the detail: reflections on the value and application of cognitive interviewing to strengthen quantitative surveys in global health. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(6):982-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab048
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 José Patrício Bispo Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Grant numbers Código de financiamento 001
