Research impact – How to deal with it? Editorial impact series part 3

Autores

  • Luisa Veras de Sandes-Guimarães Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade
  • Flavio Hourneaux Junior Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2021-249

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [CAPES]. (2019). GT impacto e relevância econômica e social: Relatorio final de atividades, Brasília, DF: CAPES.

Derrick, G. E., & Samuel, G. N. (2016). The evaluation scale: Exploring decisions about societal impact in peer review panels. Minerva, 54(1), 75–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9290-0.

Derrick, G., & Samuel, G. (2017). The future of societal impact assessment using peer review: preevaluation training, consensus building and inter-reviewer reliability. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.40.

Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: a forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975.

George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007.

Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2017). Evaluating the non-academic impact of academic research: design considerations. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254429.

Hourneaux Junior, F. (2020). Eight factors for desk-review rejection at RAUSP’s management journal. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(2), 123–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2020-151.

Hourneaux Junior, F., & Sandes-Guimarães, L. (2020). Research impact – how to evaluate it? Editorial impact series part 2. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(4), 427–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-10-2020-227.

Hughes, T., Webber, D., & O’Regan, N. (2019). Achieving wider impact in business and management: Analysing the case studies from REF 2014. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 628 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1393059.

Impact Scholar Community. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.impactscholarcommunity.com/

McKenna, H. P. (2021). Research impact: Guidance on advancement, achievement and assessment, Cham: Springer Nature. available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57028-6

Meagher, L., Lyall, C., & Nutley, S. (2008). Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation, 17(3), 163–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X331720.

Metricas.edu. (2020). Projeto de pesquisa em políticas públicas. Retrieved from https://metricas.usp.br/

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações [MCTIC]. (2020). Portaria N° 1.122, de 19 de março de 2020, diario oficial da união, edição 57, seção 1, página 19.

Morgan Jones, M., Manville, C., & Chataway, J. (2017). Learning from the UK’s research impact assessment exercise: a case study of a retrospective impact assessment exercise and questions for the future. The Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6.

Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: a “contributions” approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv016.

Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M. C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: a review. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.

Reichard, B., Reed, M. S., Chubb, J., Hall, G., Jowett, L., Peart, A., & Whittle, A. (2020). Writing impact case studies: a comparative study of high-scoring and low-scoring case studies from REF2014. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0394-7.

Editorial 7 Research Excellence Framework [REF]. (2014). About the REF. Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/2014/about/Research Excellence Framework [REF]. (2019). REF 2021: Panel criteria and working methods.Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/publications/panel-criteria-and-working-methods-201902/

Riley, B. L., Kernoghan, A., Stockton, L., Montague, S., Yessis, J., & Willis, C. D. (2018). Using contribution analysis to evaluate the impacts of research on policy: Getting to ‘good enough. ‘ Research Evaluation, 27(1), 16–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx037. Responsible Research for Business and Management [RRBM]. (2020). Principles of responsible science. Retrieved from www.rrbm.network/position-paper/principles-of-responsible-science/

Samuel, G. N., & Derrick, G. E. (2015). Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterisation of impact under the REF2014. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 229–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv007.

Sandes-Guimarães, L., & Hourneaux Junior, F. (2020). Research impact – what is it, after all? Editorial impact series part 1. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 283–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-202.

Universities UK. (2020). Impact of universities. Retrieved from www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-andstats/Pages/impact-of-higher-education.aspx

Downloads

Publicado

2021-05-04

Edição

Seção

Editorial