Seeking tirelessly for better health and life conditions for the child with myelomeningocele
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3957.3428Keywords:
Meningomyelocele, Chronic Disease, Family, Child Care, Nursing, Grounded TheoryAbstract
Objective: to understand the experience of families in the care of children with myelomeningocele. Method: a qualitative research study, which adopted Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory as its theoretical and methodological framework, and the semi-structured interview as a data collection instrument. Twenty-eight participants from thirteen families living in a municipality in the inland of São Paulo took part in the study. Results: the family tirelessly seeks better health and life conditions for the child with myelomeningocele; aiming at the child’s autonomy, it is mobilized to the necessary treatments, to learn the care, to adapt the routine, as well as to supply for all the child’s needs so that it reaches potential development, looking for a less dependent future with inclusion and social ascension. Conclusion: family nursing shows potential support in the face of myelomeningocele, due to its ability to apprehend the family system, evaluate it and enable intervention proposals in the care process. In this study, rehabilitation nursing was also emphasized, since it goes together with the child and the family who experience myelomeningocele.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
