Assessment of the quality of primary care for the elderly according to the Chronic Care Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2331.2987Keywords:
Health of the Elderly, Primary Health Care, Self Care, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Diabetes Mellitus, HypertensionAbstract
Objective: to evaluate the quality of care provided to older people with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension in the Primary Health Care (PHC) according to the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and identify associations with care outcomes. Method: cross-sectional study involving 105 older people with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of care. The total score was compared with care outcomes that included biochemical parameters, body mass index, pressure levels and quality of life. Data analysis was based on descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression. Results: there was a predominance of females and a median age of 72 years. The median PACIC score was 1.55 (IQ 1.30-2.20). Among the PACIC dimensions, the “delivery system design/decision support” was the one that presented the best result. There was no statistical difference between the medians of the overall PACIC score and individual care outcomes. However, when the quality of life and health satisfaction were simultaneously evaluated, a statistical difference between the medians was observed. Conclusion: the low PACIC scores found indicate that chronic care according to the CCM in the PHC seems still to fall short of its assumptions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-01-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
How to Cite
Assessment of the quality of primary care for the elderly according to the Chronic Care Model. (2018). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 26, e2987. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2331.2987