Between normal and pathological: Ludwik Fleck, Georges Canguilhem and the genesis of historical epistemology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9020.intelligere.2016.114460

Keywords:

Fleck, Canguilhem, historical epistemology, history of science, historiography of science

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to address, starting from some aspects of the thought of Ludwik Fleck and Georges Canguilhem, the genesis of historical epistemology in the history of science. Specifically, it seeks the contribution of the biological matrix, or the life sciences, presented by these authors, as a central framework in the constitution of historical epistemology. In other words, more than a search of similarities between Fleck and Canguilhem, the main goal is to show how, in formulating independently their ideas of history of science – especially the history of medicine – these authors contributed decisively to the basis of a historical epistemology that will be, throughout the twentieth century, a new thought style for understanding the history of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mauro Lucio Leitão Condé, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

    Departamento de História

    Programa de Pós-graduação em História (Ciência e Cultura na História)

Published

2016-05-27

How to Cite

Condé, M. L. L. (2016). Between normal and pathological: Ludwik Fleck, Georges Canguilhem and the genesis of historical epistemology. Intelligere, 2(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9020.intelligere.2016.114460