Uncertainty and informationcausality in opportunity-asartefact drivingentrepreneurial actions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-09-2021-0168Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Opportunity-As-Artefact, Information, Thermodynamics, EntropyAbstract
Purpose – Entrepreneurs prioritise and act on purposeful endeavours instigated to actions by the visions of profits and benefits in the perceived opportunities. In the state of maximum entropy, with disorderliness and disequilibrium, entrepreneurs select the preferred pathway, through the profit-sensing mechanism, with the best probability of success to bet on. Therefore, this paper unpacks the forces at work in the mechanism to explain how entrepreneurs respond to opportunity and interpret the signals to coalesce into organised actions.
Design/methodology/approach – This research is primarily a concept paper on entrepreneurial action and the mechanism leading to that action. It refers to thermodynamic principles and biological cases to explain the forces at work using mostly analogical comparisons and similarities.
Findings –This paper aims to present an alternative theoretical scaffolding for entrepreneurship researchers to explore nonrational entrepreneurial behaviours and actions in uncertain, unstable and nonequilibrium environments, thereby creating new and competing hypotheses under the backdrop of adaptive evolution and thermodynamics phenomena.
Research limitations – The discussion featuring instinctively and naturally forming responses cannot fully explain the real entrepreneurial action as there is an element of free will and choices that are not discussed. While strategic choice and free-will shape decisions, they are preceded first by the attraction of the gradients and the biased motion in the direction of profit-attractant.
Practical implications – There remain essential links and issues not addressed in this “natural science”, constituting life science and physical science, oriented entrepreneurship research and exploration. Conceptualising opportunity-as-artefact and entrepreneurship as design, significant incidences of entrepreneurial actions can be explained by the presence of gradients stimulating entrepreneurial actions.
Social Implications - This viewpoint of information causality in opportunity-as-artefact casts a new look at the venerable question of what causes entrepreneurial actions. Shane and Venkataraman brought into focus this conversation, initiating the conceptual definition of opportunity. To have entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial opportunities must come first. Figuring the signals arising from these opportunities and cueing entrepreneurs to action is the main focus of this study.
Originality/value – Considering the “mechanism” at work and the thermodynamical forces at play, the entrepreneurial design process appears to hold considerable promise for future research development.
Downloads
References
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
Balog, A. M., Baker, L. T., & Walker, A. G. (2014). Religiosity and spirituality in entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 11(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.836127
Barnum, H., Barrett, J., Clark, L. O., Leifer, M., Spekkens, R., Stepanik, N., Wiice, A., & Wiike, R. (2010). Entropy and information causality in general probabilistic theories. New Journal of Physics, 12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033024
Bekenstein, J. D. (2003). Information in the holographic universe. Scientific American, 289(2), 58–65.
Ben-Naim, A. (2008). A farewell to entropy: Statistical thermodynamics based on information. S. World Scientific.
Berglund, H., & Glaser, V. L. (2021). THE ARTIFACTS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL PRACTICE. Vernglaser.Com.
Berglund, Henrik, Bousfiha, M., & Mansoori, Y. (2020). Opportunities as Artifacts and Entrepreneurship as Design. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0285
Berglund, Henrik, & Korsgaard, S. (2017). Opportunities, Time, and Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: On the Practical Irrelevance of Propensities. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 730–733. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0168
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/32.3.303
Bornscheuer, S.-E., & Thielscher, M. (1997). Explicit and implicit indeterminism reasoning about uncertain and contradictory specifications of dynamic systems. The Journal of Logic Programming, 31(1–3), 119–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-1066(96)00124-0
Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.5465/255515
Bruyat, C., & Julien, P.-A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00043-9
Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1992). Theorising about Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600203
Davidsson, P. (2021). Ditching Discovery-Creation for Unified Venture Creation Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 104225872110308. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211030870
Dimov, D. (2011). Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00423.x
Dimov, D., Corbett, A. C., & Katz, J. A. (2016). TOWARDS A DESIGN SCIENCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP of Start-up Thinking and Action. In Forthcoming in Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (Vol. 18).
FRANK, S. A., & SMITH, E. (2011). A simple derivation and classification of common probability distributions based on information symmetry and measurement scale. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24(3), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02204.x
Frankel, A., & Kamenica, E. (2019). Quantifying Information and Uncertainty. American Economic Review, 109(10), 3650–3680. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181897
Fuster, J. M. (2002). Physiology of Executive Functions: The Perception-Action Cycle. In Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (pp. 96–108). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.003.0006
Gell-Mann, M. (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. Macmillan.
Gell-Mann, Murray, & Lloyd, S. (1996). Information measures, effective complexity, and total information. Complexity, 2(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199609/10)2:1<44::AID-CPLX10>3.0.CO;2-X
Gomes, G., Seman, L. O., Berndt, A. C., & Bogoni, N. (2022). The role of entrepreneurial orientation, organisational learning capability and service innovation in organisational performance. Revista de Gestão, 29(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2020-0103
Karmeshu, J. (2003). Entropy measures, maximum entropy principle and emerging applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 119.
Khalil, E. L. (1997). Chaos Theory Versus Heisenberg’s Uncertainty: Risk, Uncertainty and Economic Theory. The American Economist, 41(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943459704100204
Khrennikov, A., & Watanabe, N. (2021). Order-Stability in Complex Biological, Social, and AI-Systems from Quantum Information Theory. Entropy, 23(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030355
Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organisation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.50
Klir, G. J. (2006). Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalised Information Theory. Kybernetes, 35(7/8), 1297–1299. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920610675283
Krippendorff, K. (2007). An Exploration of Artificiality. Artifact, 1(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600610848
LEONG, D. (2021). RE-CONTEXTUALIZING OPPORTUNITY AS ARTIFACT SIGNALLING FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2150021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946721500217
Lu, C.-W., Chen, T.-K., & Liao, H.-H. (2010). Information uncertainty, information asymmetry and corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(9), 2265–2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.02.013
McCain, R. A. (1985). Economic planning for market economies. Economic Modelling, 2(4), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-9993(85)90027-6
McCann, B. T., & Vroom, G. (2015). Opportunity evaluation and changing beliefs during the nascent entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(6), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614544198
McKelvie, A., Haynie, J. M., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.004
Menin, B. (2020). Amount of Information and Measurement Uncertainty. Physical Science International Journal, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/psij/2020/v24i330179
Molina, V., & Maya, J. (2017). How should an entrepreneurship ecosystem be? Entrepreneurship ecosystems as an artifact of design. In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Pp. 734-741). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Nikraftar, T., Hosseini, E., & Mohammadi, E. (2022). The factors influencing technological entrepreneurship in nanotechnology businesses. Revista de Gestão, 29(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-02-2021-0029
Ofori-Dankwa, J., & Julian, S. D. (2001). Complexifying Organizational Theory: Illustrations using Time Research. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845809
Peterson, D. K., & Pitz, G. F. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.85
Petrakis, P. E., & Konstantakopoulou, D. P. (2015). Entrepreneurship under Uncertainty. In Uncertainty in Entrepreneurial Decision Making (pp. 59–74). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460790_5
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2017). In Defense of Common Sense in Entrepreneurship Theory: Beyond Philosophical Extremities and Linguistic Abuses. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0169
Rodríguez, R. A., & Cáceres-Hernández, J. J. (2018). Information, entropy, value, and price formation: An econophysical perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 512, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.005
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1937
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00203-9
Selden, P. D., & Fletcher, D. E. (2015). The entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.002
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research. In Source: The Academy of Management Review (Vol. 25, Issue 1).
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Simon, H. A. (2019). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
Tetlock, P. E., & Levi, A. (1982). Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90082-8
Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 659–687. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0109
Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognised or constructed? Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.004
Valentijn, E. A. (2021). Powers of Two: The Information Universe--Information as the Building Block of Everything. Springer Nature.
Vedral, V. (2002). The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197
Weick, ., Karl E, ., Sutcliffe, K. M, ., & Obstfeld, D, . (2005). Organising and the Process of Sensemaking. . Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., 3.
Weick, K. E., & Bougon, M. G. (1986). Organisations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. In The Thinking Organisation: Dynamics of Organizational Social Cognition, 102–135.
Weick Karl, E. (1979). The social psychology of organising. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
