Non-adversary conflict solution models under the consensual Public Administration prism

Abstract

According to a Consensual Public Administration project, the Impositive Administration model has been increasingly replaced by the notion of the right to good governance in the light of a more participative and democratic management. Considering the excessive State litigation as a challenge to be faced, the adoption of non-adverse means of conflict resolution would fill the interests of participation, it would and result in resource savings and eficency in the management of conflicts by the Public Administration. The data analysis used deductive methods, starting from the broader thesis that the improvement of the Judiciary depends on the reduction of the excessive litigation of the State itself until reaching the particularity of the agreement or non-adversarial solution; historical-evolutionary, in order to briefly analyze the antecedent models of the object of study and dialectic, when analyzing the compatibility of the agreement with the unavailability of the public interest and the parameters to be followed in the search for consensus; the bibliographic research has being the technique used.