Português
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2022.193141Abstract
Este artigo discute o orçamento participativo por uma ótica pouco explorada pela literatura: a dimensão do orçamento. A literatura que trata o orçamento participativo em geral foca no lado da participação, buscando analisar quais são os seus determinantes, barreiras para a adoção, e efeitos causados pela participação. O objetivo do artigo é trazer reflexões sobre a participação no ciclo orçamentário, analisando possíveis formas de participação em cada etapa, em que se busca trazer reflexões tanto para pesquisas quanto para os adotantes de mecanismos de orçamento participativo. Adicionalmente, indicamos caminhos ainda pouco explorados pela literatura sobre orçamento participativo.
Downloads
References
Andrews, M., Cangiano, M., Cole, N., Renzio, P. de, Krause, P., & Seligmann, R. (2014). This is PFM. Center for International Development at Harvard University, 13.
Anessi-pessina, E., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Budgeting and Rebudgeting in Local Governments: Siamese Twins? Public Administration Review, 72(6), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02590.x
Aquino, A. C. B. de, & Azevedo, R. R. de. (2017). Restos a pagar e a perda da credibilidade orçamentária. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(4), 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612163584
Aquino, A. C. B. de, & Batley, R. A. (2021). Pathways to hybridization: Assimilation and accommodation of public financial reforms in Brazil. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101297
Azevedo, R.R. de. (2014). Imprecisão na estimação orçamentária dos municípios brasileiros. Dissertação de Mestrado. Faculdade de Administração, Economia e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Ribeirão Preto. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.96.2014.tde-17032014-110156
Azevedo, R. R. de, Cardoso, R. L., & Cunha, A. S. M. da. (2021). Effects of the iron cage on the social participation effectiveness. IRSPM.
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics and Society, 42(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2017). Popular democracy: the paradox of participation. Stanford University Press.
Baldissera, J. F., Walter, S. A., Fiirst, C., & Asta, D. D. (2019). A Percepção dos Observatórios Sociais sobre a Qualidade, Utilidade e Suficiência da Transparência Pública dos Municípios Brasileiros. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 14(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v0i0.18404
Beuermann, D. W., & Amelina, M. (2014). Does Participatory Budgeting Improve Decentralized Public Service Delivery? In Inter-American Development Bank.
Boonstra, B., & Boelens, L. (2011). Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research and Practice, 4(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
Bouckaert, G., Conings, V., & Sterck, M. (2007). Report Budgeting, accounting and auditing for results. Towards integrated financial management. Financial Management & Performance Measurement, 1–165.
Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2015). Tracing the future of reporting in the public sector: introducing integrated popular reporting. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2014-0140
Couto, C. G., & Abrucio, F. L. (1995). Governando a Cidade? A força e a fraqueza da Câmara Municipal. São Paulo Em Perspectiva, 9(2), 57–65.
Cunha, A. S. M. da. (2019). O processo orçamentário e a vitalidade das organizações governamentais. Ed. FGV.
Dahan, M., & Strawczynski, M. (2020). Budget institutions and government effectiveness. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(2), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2019-0055
de Renzio, P., Spada, P., & Wampler, B. (2019). Paradise Lost? The crisis of participatory budgeting in its own birthplace.
Dias, N. (2018). Hope for Democracy: 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide. In Hope for Democracy. Epopeia Records. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190084523.001.0001
Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437–447. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x/abstract
Fajardo, B. de A. G. (2016). Vieses orçamentários em entes subnacionais: uma análise sob a ótica da estimação das receitas estaduais. Tese (pós-doutorado em administração) – Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV, Rio de Janeiro. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/17604.
Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759271000143x
Forrester, J. P. (1993). The rebudgeting process in state government: the case of Missouri. The American Review of Public Administration, 23(2), 155–178.
Gonçalves, A. de O., Bilhim, J. A. de F., Rezende, R. B. de, & Gonçalves, R. de S. (2021). Prestação de contas e controle social: como o processo funciona. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 15(61), e166382–e166382. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2021.166382
Gonçalves, S. (2014). The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009
Gordon, V., Osgood, J. L., & Boden, D. (2017). The Role of Citizen Participation and the Use of Social Media Platforms in the Participatory Budgeting Process. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1072215
Grin, E. J. (2018). Gestão dos territórios da cidade em São Paulo: a berlinda entre a democracia representativa e os mecanismos de controle social. Revista de Administração Pública e Controle Social, 10(2), 136–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v10i2.1578
Guo, H., & Neshkova, M. I. (2012). Citizen Input in the Budget Process: When Does It Matter Most? The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012443588
Harmon, Michael (1969). Organization Theory For Public Administration. Boston: MA, Little Brown and Company.
Hijal-Moghrabi, I. (2018). Why Is it So Hard to Rationalize the Budgetary Process? A Behavioral Analysis of Performance-Based Budgeting. Public Organization Review, 19, 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0410-1
Ho, A. T.-K. (2018). From Performance Budgeting to Performance Budget Management: Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12915
Iasulaitis, S., Nebot, C. P., Carneiro, E., & Sampaio, R. C. (2019). Interatividade e ciclo de políticas públicas no orçamento participativo digital: uma análise internacional. Revista de Administração Pública, 53(6), 1091–1115. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180272.
Jones, R., Lande, E., Lüder, K., & Portal, M. (2013). A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12022
Jun, K. N., & Bryer, T. (2017). Facilitating Public Participation in Local Governments in Hard Times. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643587
Kasymova, J. (2017). Understanding the Challenges and Sustainability of Citizen Engagement in the Budgeting Processes of Developing Countries. Administration and Society, 49(3), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714558713
Kettl, D. F. (2015). From Intergovernmental to Intersectorial. In: Guy, Mary and Rubin, Marilyn – Public Administration Evolving. New York: Routledge.
Kloby, K. (2009). Less is more: exploring citizen-based financial reporting in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-21-03-2009-B002
Kumar, M. S., & Ter-Minassian, T. (2007). Promoting Fiscal Discipline. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=19694.0
Manes-rossi, F., Brusca, I., Orelli, R. L., Lorson, P. C., & Haustein, E. (2021). Features and drivers of citizen participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities from participatory budgeting in three European cities., 00(00), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963821
Mcnulty, S. (2019). Frustrated Participation: Evaluating Fifteen Years of the National Participatory, 6(11), 7–30. https://doi.org/108800/rcpg.201901.001
McNulty, S. (2014). Mandating participation: Exploring Peru’s National Participatory Budget Law. In N. Dias (Ed.), Hope for democracy - 25 years of participatory budgeting worldwide (pp. 203–214).
Migchelbrink, K., & Van de Walle, S. (2019). When Will Public Officials Listen? A Vignette Experiment on the Effects of Input Legitimacy on Public Officials’ Willingness to Use Public Participation. Public Administration Review, 00, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13138
Mussari, R., & Cepiku, D. (2007). Public administration reform in transition. Reflections from the Albanian experience. Public Management Review, 9(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701425738
Nebot, C. P., & Pires, V. (2020). Futuro do orçamento participativo: do questionamento da sua efetividade à dúvida sobre a desejabilidade. In Uma nova democracia para o Século XXI? (pp. 273–284). IPPDS.
Nollenberger, K., Maher, C., Beach, P., & Mcgee, K. M. (2012). Budget Priorities and Community Perceptions. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 24(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-24-02-2012-B004
O’Leary, D. E. (2015). Armchair Auditors: Crowdsourcing Analysis of Government Expenditures. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51225
Park, J. H. (2019). Does Citizen Participation Matter to Performance-Based Budgeting? Public Performance and Management Review, 42(2), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1437050
Park, Y. (2020). Participatory Budgeting and Willingness to Pay Taxes: Evidence from an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study. The George Washington University.
Paulin, A. (2019). The Quantum Budget vs. Participatory Budgeting. A Comparison of Advanced Concepts for Involving Citizens in Public Funding. Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 154–158.
Pereira, D., & Figueira, A. R. (2021). Effects of citizen participation in the social accountability of budget amendments. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 27(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1801963
Pin, L. (2016). On Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON. Canadian Political Science Review, 10(1), 72–108.
Pin, L. (2020). Race, Citizenship and Participation: Interrogating the Racial Dynamics of Participatory Budgeting. New Political Science, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2020.1840199
Pires, V. (2001). Orçamento Participativo. São Paulo: Ed. Manole.
Pires, R. R. C. (2011). Efetividade das Instituições Participativas no Brasil: Estratégias de Avaliação (Vol. 7). IPEA.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Samuels, D. (2014). The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences. Comparative Politics, 46(3), 313–332. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43664108.
Rezende, F., & Cunha, A. S. M. da. (2013). A reforma esquecida. Orçamento, gestão pública e desenvolvimento. Ed. FGV.
Ríos, A. M., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2017). Factors Explaining Public Participation in the Central Government Budget Process. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12197
Röcke, A. (2014). Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillam.
Rodgers, D. (2010). Contingent democratization? the rise and fall of participatory budgeting in Buenos Aires. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X10000039
Rubin, I. S. (2014). Past and Future Budget Classics: A Research Agenda. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12289
Sampaio, R. C. (2016). e-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participação. Revista de Administração Pública, 50(6), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612152210
Santos, L. O. S. dos. (2021). Análise da consistência de relatórios financeiros disponibilizados pelos municípios dos estados do Piauí e Rio Grande do Sul à STN e aos respectivos TCEs. Dissertação Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV, Rio de Janeiro. https://hdl.handle.net/10438/30379
Sales, T (2017). Aspectos jurídicos do impeachment, dos crimes de responsabilidade e das 'pedaladas fiscais'. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 16(7), 57-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3008
Shybalkina, I., & Bifulco, R. (2018). Does Participatory Budgeting Change the Share of Public Funding to Low Income Neighborhoods ? Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(1), 45–66.
Silva, C. C. da. (2019). O nível de consistência das informações financeiras dos municípios brasileiros. Dissertação Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV, Rio de Janeiro. https://hdl.handle.net/10438/27693
Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
SOF. (2021). Manual Técnico de Orçamento.
Soguel, N., Caperchione, E., & Cohen, S. (2020). Allocating government budgets according to citizen preferences: a cross-national survey budget. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2019-0123
Ter-Minassian, T. (2016). Fiscal and Financial Issues for 21st Century Cities. Global Economy and Development at Brookings. Project on 21st Century City Governance. Paper 1.
TCE-SP. (2019). IEGM - Índice de Efetividade na Gestão Municipal. Tribunal de Contas do Estado de São Paulo. Disponível em <https://painel.tce.sp.gov.br>
Torruella, J. B., Martins, S., & Nebot, C. P. (2020). Uma nova democracia para o Século XXI? IPPDS.
Touchton, M. R., & Wampler, B. (2020). Public engagement for public health: participatory budgeting, targeted social programmes, and infant mortality in Brazil. Development in Practice, 30(5), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1742662
Touchton, M. R., Wampler, B., & Peixoto, T. (2019). Of Governance and Revenue Participatory Institutions and Tax Compliance in Brazil.
Touchton, M., Wampler, B., & Peixoto, T. (2020). Of democratic governance and revenue: Participatory institutions and tax generation in Brazil. Governance, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12552
Touchton, M., Wampler, B., & Spada, P. (2019). The digital revolution and governance in Brazil: Evidence from participatory budgeting. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 16(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1613281
Uittenbroek, C. J., Mees, H. L. P., Hegger, D. L. T., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2019). The design of public participation: who participates, when and how? Insights in climate adaptation planning from the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1569503
Villaverde, J. (2016). Perigosas Pedaladas. Os Bastidores da Crise que abalou o Brasil e levou ao fim o governo Dilma Roussef. 1. ed. São Paulo: Geração Editorial, 33.
Vries, M. S. de, Nemec, J., & Spacek, D. (2019). Performance-Based Budgeting in the Public Sector (M. S. de Vries, J. Nemec, & D. Spacek (eds.); IIAS Serie). Palgrave Macmillam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02077-4
Walters, L. C., Aydelotte, J., & Miller, J. (2000). Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00097
Wampler, B. (2003). Orçamento participativo: uma explicação para ampla variação nos resultados. In L. Avritzer & Z. Navarro (Eds.), A inovação democrática no Brasil: o Orçamento Participativo (pp. 61–86). Ed. Cortez.
Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. Penn State Press.
Wampler, B. (2008). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508x12911362383679
Wampler, B. (2012). Entering the State: Civil Society Activism and Participatory Governance in Brazil. Political Studies, 60(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00912.x
Wampler, B., McNulty, S., & Touchton, M. (2021). Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Wampler, B., & Goldfrank, B. (2022). The Rise, Spread, and Decline of Brazil’s Participatory Budgeting. The Arc of a Democratic Innovation. Palgrave Macmillam.
Wang, Q., & Niu, M. (2020). Exploring the relationship between government budget information and citizens’ perceptions of public service performance in China. Public Management Review, 22(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1584234
Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002
Zuccolotto, R., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2014). Budgetary Transparency and Democracy: The Effectiveness of Control Institutions. International Business Research, 7(6), 83–96.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ricardo Rocha de Azevedo, Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, Armando Santos Moreira da Cunha, Brian Wampler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
