O sacrifício do carneiro islâmico como objeto transicional: notas antropológicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012007000200008Keywords:
Islam, Feast of Sacrifice, Performance Anthropology, Winnicott theoryAbstract
In this article I would like to explore the multiples senses that muslins attributes to the sacrificial goat at the Feast of Sacrifice, Eid Adhha, one of the most important celebrations of the Islamic calendar, second only to Ramadan. This sacrifice is here analyzed from the perspective of D.W. Winnicott's psychoanalytical theory, as a sort of transitional object,"not me" and"not not me", the latest also supported by Richard Schechner when focuses the actor's experience. The idea developed here is to demonstrate that the goat occupies the devotee's place and establish an analogy between the goat sacrifice and the sacrifice of the one that is a muslin.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2007-12-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who intend to publish in this journal must agree with the following terms:
- a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- b) Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish it as a book chapter), as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. on their personal webpage) after the editorial process, for this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the work. See The Effect of Open Access Publications.
How to Cite
Ferreira, F. C. B. (2007). O sacrifício do carneiro islâmico como objeto transicional: notas antropológicas . Revista De Antropologia, 50(2), 747-783. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012007000200008