Participative governance quality over marine spaces: challenges for estuarine socioecological resilience at the Paranaguá Bay Zone

Authors

  • Daniel Hauer Queiroz Telles Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Lígia Carolina Alcântara Pinotti Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Keywords:

Resilience, Inclusive Governance, Conceptual framework, Marine space, Dataless

Abstract

Promoting inclusive and effective governance in regional estuaries offers an encompassing challenge within the scope of Policy analysis and its interactions within socioecological research. The integrated approach for both theoretical elements has not easily been improved, despite the increase in analytical frameworks in this theme. The Paranaguá Bay Zone (PBZ) in the state of Paraná, Brazil, is composed of a few cities, several large, protected areas, and traditional communities. On the one hand, the intensification of real estate pressures in a low demographic region is creating a wave of value conversion regarding the trends of the coastal gentrification phenomenon, notwithstanding the lower degree of intensity when compared to other Brazilian estuaries. On the other hand, it shows a lack of political representation and institutional action at the subnational level. This asymmetrical process is strongly related to historical land development and the controversial process of implementing protected areas and zoning tools. Promoting the economic rise of the territory has affected traditional communities and conservation management, requiring permanent improvement in the ability for community mobilization and juridical vigilance in the face of impacts related to such pressure. In the meantime, scholars have considered knowledge building, which brings up assessment issues on how the decision-making process has been operated and what gaps and asymmetries can be revealed for further resilience analyses. This study is an effort to approach the performance of participative governance of the estuary and is restricted to a preliminary assessment of the participative management committees designed by legislation under area-based attributions. This study is not aimed at exploring the belief systems of different social groups/stakeholders. Results have a great emphasis on methodological building and testing, which revealed the importance of imposing an inventory and hierarchy model on the multiple committees of governance and their sectorization across adjacent areas. Results also underline variables of interest and pilot indicators in the subject under analysis. Preliminary results point to the need for overcoming methodological challenges, and findings that are useful as first evidence in the comprehension of the low performance by different committees, which often operate without any regular, systematic, integrated, transparent, legitimate, and permanent agenda of Policy activities for the PBZ fisheries territory. Qualitative data and institutional memoirs should be available and categorized in government programs, whereas research efforts that look to better recognize the idiosyncrasies of community realities under the pressures of non-transparent economic drivers are much needed.

References

Andrés, M., Muñoz, J. M. B., Onetti, J. G. & Zuniga, L. D. C. 2023. Mapping services for an ecosystem based management along the Andalusian coastal zone (Spain). Ocean & Coastal Management, 231, 106402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106402.

Barros, A. C., Silva, T. J., Garcia, Y. M., Costa, D. M. & Tagliarini, F. S. N. 2015. Sistema de informação geográfica na identificação de conflitos ambientais em áreas de preservação permanente. Holos Environment, 15(2), 152_158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/holos.

v15i2.9897.

Bennett, N. J. 2019. In Political Seas: Engaging with Political Ecology in the Ocean and Coastal Environment. Coastal Management, 47(1), 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.108. 0/08920753.2019.1540905.

Bermudes, W. L., Santana, B. T., Braga, J. H. O. & Souza, P. H. 2016. Tipos de escalas utilizadas em pesquisas e suas aplicações. Revista Vértices, 18(2), 7_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19180/1809-2667.v18n216-01.

Bettim, M., Krelling, A. P., Di Domenico, M., Cornwell, T. O., & Turra, A. 2021. Daily environmental variation influences temporal patterns of marine debris deposition along an estuarine outlet in southern Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 172, 112859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112859.

Blum, C. T., Roderjan, C. V. & Galvão, F. 2011. Composição florística e distribuição altitudinal de epífitas vasculares da Floresta Ombrófila Densa na Serra da Prata, Morretes, Paraná, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 11(4), 141_159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-06032011000400015.

Boucquey, N., Fairbanks, L., St. Martin, K., Campbell, L. M., & McCay, B. 2016. The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of ‘Community’ and ‘Environment’. Geoforum, 75, 1_11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

geoforum.2016.06.014 Brasil. 2000. Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1º, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União, nº138 (19 julho), 45_48.

Cabral, A. C. & Martins, C. C. 2018. Insights about sources, distribution, and degradation of sewage and biogenic molecular markers in surficial sediments and suspended particulate matter from a human-impacted subtropical estuary. Environmental Pollution, 241, 1071–1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.032.

Contente, R. F., Stefanoni, M. F. & Spach, H. L. 2011. Fish assemblage structure in an estuary of the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot (southern Brazil). Ichthyological Research, 58(1), 38–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-010-0192-0.

Cunha, C. L. N., Scudelari, A. C., Gonçalves, J. E., & Mercuri, E. G. F. 2009. Aplicação de um modelo ODDBO no Complexo Estuarino de Paranaguá. In: Anais Simpósio Brasileiro de Recursos Hídricos, Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, Campo Grande(18ª ed., SBRH01862). Available from: https://anais.abrhidro.org.br/job.php?Job=10404. Access date: 2023 Jun. 22.

Dale, P., Sporne, I., Knight, J., Sheaves, M., EslamiAndergoli, L. & Dwyer, P. G. 2019. A conceptual model to improve links between science, policy and practice in coastal management. Marine Policy, 103, 42–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.029.

Daniell, K. A., Plant, R., Pilbeam, V., Sabinot, C., Paget, N., Astles, K., Steffens, R., Barreteau, O., Bouard, S., Coad, P., Gordon, A., Ferrand, N., Meur, P-Y. L., Lejars, C., Maurel, P., Rubio, A., Rougier, J-E., White, I. 2020. Evolutions in estuary governance? Reflections and lessons from Australia, France and New Caledonia. Marine Policy, 112, 103704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103704.

Deng, Y. & Shi, Y. 2023. Recent developments of China’s institutional Reform for Ocean Management: An appraisal. Coastal Management, 51(2), 91–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2023.2176277. Participative Environmental Governance: reducing coastal conflicts Ocean and Coastal Research 2024, v72(suppl 1):e24040 16 Telles and Pinotti der Zouwen, M. 2006. Dynamics in nature policy practices across the European union. In: Arts, B. & Leroy, P., (Eds.). Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance (vol. 47, pp. 139–159). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_7.

Djosetro, M. & Behagel. J. H. 2020. Building local support for a coastal protected area: Collaborative governance in the Bigi Pan Multiple Use Management Area of Suriname. Marine Policy, 112, 103746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103746.

Eger, S. & Courtenay, S. C. 2021. Integrated coastal and marine management: Insights from lived experiences in the Bay of Fundy, Atlantic Canada. Ocean & Coastal Management, 204, 105457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105457.

Ehler, C. & Douvere, F. 2009. Marine Spatial Planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. IOC Manual and Guides no. 53, ICAM Dossier no. 6. Paris: UNESCO . Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186559. Access

date: 2023 Jun. 22.

Elliott, M., Burdon, D., Atkins, J. P., Borja, A, Cormier, R, de Jonge, V. N. & Turner, R. K. 2017. “And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!” – A unifying framework for marine environmental management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 118(1-2), 27_40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

marpolbul.2017.03.049.

Engle, N. L. & Lemos, M. C. 2010. Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global environmental change, 20(1), 4–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2009.07.001.

Faraco, L. F. D. & Lana, P. C. 2004. Leaf-consumption levels in subtropical mangroves of Paranaguá Bay (SE Brazil). Wetlands Ecology and Management, 12, 115–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/b:wetl.0000021666.42546. c2.

Flannery, W., Healy, N. & Luna, M. 2018. Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning. Marine Policy, 88, 32–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.001.

Foley, A., Brinklow, L., Corbett, J., Kelman, I., Klöck, C., Moncada, S., Mycoo, M., Nunn, P., Pugh, J., Robinson, S., Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V. & Walshe, R. 2023. Understanding “Islandness”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(8), 1800–1817, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2193249.

Gammanpila, M., Wijeyaratne, M. J. S. & Amarasinghe, U. S. 2019. The dwindling community-based management strategies in the brush park fishery of a tropical estuary: Need for co-management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 167, 145–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.008.

Garcia, M. R. & Martins, C. C. 2021. A systematic evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in South Atlantic subtropical mangrove wetlands under a coastal zone development scenario. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111421.

Glegg, G., Jefferson, R. & Fletcher, S. 2015. Marine governance in the English Channel (La Manche): Linking science and management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 95(2), 707–718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpolbul.2015.02.020.

Goelz, T., Scheld, A. M., Hartley, T. W. & Carboni, I. 2020. Understanding Structural Factors and Actor Attributes That Impact the Development of Cohesion within a Participatory Modeling Process. Coastal Management, 48(6), 577–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669

Gonçalves, C. 2018. Perspetivas sobre resiliência territorial: resistência fluxível, interdependência sistémica, adaptabilidade evolutiva. Geographia, 20(43), 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/geographia2018.v20i43. a27210.

Hadlich, H. L. 2010. Variabilidade espacial de associações de poliquetas ao longo de um gradiente de contaminação por esgotos no Canal da Cotinga, Baía de Paranaguá (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas). Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná. Aveilable from:https://hdl.handle.net/1884/24078. Access date: 2023 Jun 22.

Heron, E. L., Logie, J., Allen, W., Heron, R. L., Blackett, P., Davies, A., Greenaway, K., Glavovic, B., Hikuroa, D. 2019. Diversity, contestation, participation in Aotearoa New Zealand’s multi-use/user marine spaces. Marine Policy, 106, 103536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

marpol.2019.103536 ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade). 2020. Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional do Superagüi. Brasília, DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Available from: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/ptbr/assuntos/biodiversidade/unidade-de-conservacao/unidades-de-biomas/marinho/lista-de-ucs/parna-dosuperagui/arquivos/plano_de_manejo_parna_do_superagui.pdf. Access date: 2023 Jun. 22.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. Summary for Policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, & B. Zhou (Eds.). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York(p. 3–32). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001.

Jones, K. & Seara, T. 2020. Integrating Stakeholders’ Perceptions into Decision-Making for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management. Coastal Management, 48(4), 275–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1773211.

Kolm, H. E., Schoenenberger, M. F. B., Piemont, M. R., Souza, P. S. A., Schnell e Scühli, G., Mucciatto, M. B. & Mazzuco, R. 2002. Spatial variation of bacteria in surface waters of Paranaguá and Antonina Bays, Paraná, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 45(1), 27–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132002000100005.

Lana, P. C. 2004. Novas formas de gestão dos manguezais brasileiros: a Baía de Paranaguá como estudo de caso. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 10, 169–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v10i0.3106. Participative Environmental Governance: reducing coastal conflicts Ocean and Coastal Research 2024, v72(suppl 1):e2404017.

Telles and Pinotti Lana, P. C., Marone, E., Lopes, R. M., & Machado, E. C. 2001. The subtropical estuarine complex of Paranaguá bay, Brazil. In: Seeliger, U., Kjerve, B. (Eds), Ecological Studies (vol. 144, p. 131–145). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04482-7_11.

Leroy, P., & Arts, B. 2006. Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. In: Arts, B. & Leroy, P. (Eds.). Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance (vol. 47, p. 1–19). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_1.

Lima, B. A. 2019. Estudo da poluição hídrica do complexo estuarino de Paranaguá–PR, causado pela presença de HPAS, n-alcanos e contaminantes emergentes (Mestrado em Ciência e Tecnologia Ambiental) Curitiba: Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. Available from: http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/4272. Access date: 2023 Jun. 22.

Long, R. D., Charles, A. & Stephenson, R. L. 2015. Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management. Marine Policy, 57, 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.013.

Macedo, H. S., Medeiros, R. P. 2021. Rethinking governance in a Brazilian multiple-use marine protected area. Marine Policy, 127, 103235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.019.

Martins, C. C., Braun, J. A. F., Seyffert, B. H., Machado, E. C., & Fillmann, G. 2010. Anthropogenic organic matter inputs indicated by sedimentary fecal steroids in a large South American tropical estuary (Paranaguá estuarine system, Brazil). Marine Pollution Bulletin,

(11), 2137–2143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpolbul.2010.07.027.

Martins, N. L. A. & Carmo, V. M. 2016. Mediação de conflitos socioambientais: Uma alternativa à efetivação do direito fundamental ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, 6(2), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda1579.

Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London, Sage Publications. McCarthy, N. 2001. Chapter Name. In: Berkes, F., Folke, F., Colding, J. (Eds.). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. X-X). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.5751/ES-00202-040205.

Mengatto, M. F. & Nagai, R. H. 2022. A first assessment of microplastic abundance in sandy beach sediments of the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, South Brazil (RAMSAR site). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 177, 113530) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113530.

Millennium Ecosystem Aassessment. 2005. Environmental Degradation and Human Well-Being: Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Population and Development Review, 31(2), 389–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00073.x.

Miranda, B. P., Roderjan, C. V., Botosso, P. C., Santos, T. L., & Andrade, V. H. F. 2019 Estimativa da biomassa aérea e carbono de Ilex microdonta em floresta atlântica, Paraná, Brasil. BIOFIX Scientific Journal, 4(1), 58–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/biofix.v4i1.63865.

MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2008. Macrodiagnóstico da Zona Costeira e Marinha do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis.

Moon K., Cvitanovic C., Blackman D. A., Scales I. R. &, Browne N. K. 2021. Five Questions to Understand Epistemology and Its Influence on Integrative Marine Research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.574158.

Muñoz, J. M. B. 2020. Progress of coastal management in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ocean & Coastal Management, 184, 105009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105009.

Noernberg, M. A., Lautert, L. F. C., Araújo, A. D., Marone, E., Angelotti, R., Netto, J. P. B., & Krug, L. A. 2006. Remote Sensing and GIS Integration for Modelling the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex-Brazil. Journal of Coastal Research, 39(3), 1627–1631.

Oliveira Júnior, J. G. C., Santos, A. P. O., Malhado, A. C. M., Souza, C. N., Bragagnolo, C., Santos, A. O., Cardoso de Barros, E. L. S. F., Vieira, F. A. S., Dantas, I. F. V., Aldabalde, J. C., Campos-Silva, J. V., Lima, J. A. S., Verba, J. T., Santos-Silva, M. R., Fabré, N. N., Gamarra, N. C., Ladle, R. J. & Batista, V. S.. 2024. Local attitudes towards conservation governance in a large tropical multiple-use Marine Protected Area in Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management, 248, 106974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106974.

Olsson, P., Bodin, Ö., & Folke, C. 2010. Building Transformative Capacity for Ecosystem Stewardship in Social-Ecological Systems. In: Armitage, D. & Plummer, R. (Eds.). Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance (pp. 263–285). Springer, Berlin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_13.

Pattberg, P. & Widerberg, O. 2015. Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 684–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561773.

Paula, E. V.; Pigosso, A. M. B.; Wroblewski, C. A. 2018. Unidades de Conservação no litoral do Paraná. Evolução territorial e grau de implementação. In: Sulzbach, M., Archanjo, D. & Quadros, J. Litoral do Paraná: territórios e perspectivas – dimensões e desenvolvimento (pp. 41–92). Rio de Janeiro: Autografia.

Polejack, A., Gruber, S. & Wisz, M. S. 2021. Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00729-6.

Pomeroy, R. & Douvere, F. 2008. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32(5), 816–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017.

Santos, D. M., Araújo, I. P., Machado, E. C., CarvalhoFilho, M. A. S., Fernandez, M. A., Marchi, M. R. R., & Godoi, A. F. L. 2009. Organotin compounds in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná, Brazil: Evaluation of biological effects, surface sediment, and suspended particulate matter, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(12), 1926–1931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.09.004.

Santos, L. J. C., de Paula, E. V. & Soares, C. R. 2015. Antonina Bay and Superagüi Island: A mosaic of Participative Environmental Governance: reducing coastal conflicts Ocean and Coastal Research 2024, v72(suppl 1):e24040 18 Telles and Pinotti mountains, coastal plain, and Atlantic Forest. In: Vieira, B., Salgado, A. & Santos, L. (Eds.). Landscapes and Landforms of Brazil (pp. 103–113). Springer, Dordrecht, World Geomorphological Landscapes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8023-0_10.

Santos, M. 2002. A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, razão e emoção. São Paulo: EDUSP.

Secchi, L. 2013 Políticas públicas: conceitos, esquemas de análises, casos práticos (2a ed). São Paulo: Cengage Learning.

Silva, A. C. Q., Torres, C. V., Silva, C. E., Martiniano, L. S. G., & Braga Júnior, S. A. M. 2011. A mediação como mecanismo de resolução de conflitos socioambientais. In: AnaisSalão de Iniciação Científica da Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró (7a ed,

pp. 662–669). Available from: https://www.uern.br/sic/arquivos/VII_SIC_CSA.pdf. Access date: 2023 Jun. 22.

Siuves Alves, A. F. & Jota Resende, L. 2020. A relevância da mediação de conflitos socioambientais para a conscientização ambiental da sociedade contemporânea. Trayectorias Humanas Trascontinentales, 7, 63–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25965/trahs.2082.

Smit, B. & Wandel, J. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), p. 282–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.

Spooner, E., Karnauskas, M., Harvey, C. J., Kelble, C., Rosellon-Druker, J., Kasperski, S., Lucey, S. M., Andrews, K. S., Gittings, S. R., Moss, J. H., Gove, J. M., Samhouri, J. F., Allee, R. J., Bograd, S. J., Monaco, M. E., Clay, P. M., Rogers, L. A., Marshak, A. R., Wongbusarakum, S., Broughton, K. & Lynch, P. D. 2021. Using integrated ecosystem assessments to build resilient ecosystems, communities, and economies.

Coastal Management, 49(1), 26–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846152.

Telles, D. H. Q. 2023. Fostering Governance at Remote Marine Protected Areas in Times of Blue Economy: Baseline for Stakeholders Composition. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 23(E1), 39–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34257/GJSFREVOL23IS1PG39.

Telles, D. H. Q, Gandara, J. M. G, Fontoura, L. M., & Sperb, M. P. 2011. Gestión territorial y planificación participativa en la “Ilha do Mel” – Brasil: Conceptos y Prácticas. Estudios y perspectivas en turismo, 20, 270-287.

van der Plank, S., Cox, S., Cumberbatch, J., Mahon, R., Thomas, B., Tompkins, E. L. & Corbett, J. 2022. Polycentric governance, coordination and capacity: The case of Sargassum influxes in the Caribbean. Coastal Management, 50(4), 285–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2078172.

Viégas, R. N. 2013. Os descaminhos da “resolução negociada”: o Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta (TAC) como forma de tratamento dos conflitos ambientais (Doutorado em Planejamento Urbano e Regional). Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Available from: http://objdig.ufrj.br/42/teses/811967.pdf. Access date: 2023 Jun. 22.

Wen, W., Samudera, K., Adrianto, L., Johnson, G. L., Brancato, M. S. & White, A. T. 2022. Towards Marine Spatial Planning Implementation in Indonesia: progress and hindering factors. Coastal Management, 50(6), 469–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2126262.

Wisz, M. S., Satterthwaite, E. V., Fudge, M., Fischer, M., Polejack, A., St. John, M., Fletcher, S. & Rudd, M. A. 2020 100 Opportunities for More Inclusive Ocean Research: Cross-Disciplinary Research Questions for Sustainable Ocean Governance and Management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00576.

Yandle, T., Tookes, J. S. & Grace-McCaskey, C. A. 2020. US Virgin Islands Fishing Community resilience: Informing a research agenda. Coastal Management, 48(5), 481–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1796191.

Zacarias, R., Britez, R., Galvão, F., & Boeger, M. 2012. Fitossociologia de dois trechos de floresta ombrófila densa aluvial em solos hidromórficos, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Floresta, 42(4), 769–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v42i4.2040.

Downloads

Published

10.04.2024

How to Cite

Participative governance quality over marine spaces: challenges for estuarine socioecological resilience at the Paranaguá Bay Zone. (2024). Ocean and Coastal Research, 72(Suppl. 1), e24040. https://doi.org/10.1590/