Sensibilidade performativa e comunicação das coisas
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i3p165-188Mots-clés :
Sensibilidade performativa, Comunicação das coisas, Fitbit, Teoria Ator-RedeRésumé
O objetivo deste artigo é afirmar o caráter social dos objetos e apresentar o que diferencia as redes sociotécnicas de objetos cotidianos daquelas de objetos aumentados digitalmente – as quais caracterizam a Internet das Coisas. Denominamos essa diferença de sensibilidade performativa. Mostraremos que a sensibilidade performativa não é uma característica técnica de sensores e atuadores, mas uma propriedade que amplia o objeto de modo infocomunicacional em uma rede de comunicação também mais ampla, a partir de performances e procedimentos algorítmicos. Destacamos como essa sensibilidade performativa pode ser vista como um elemento fundamental para pensar um modelo de comunicação das coisas, explorando as narrativas procedimentais da Fitbit Charge HR2.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Références
ASHTON, K. That “internet of things” thing: in the real world, things matter more than ideas. RFID Journal, Hauppauge, 22 jun. 2009. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2ARgioI>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.
ATZORI, L.; IERA, A.; MORABITO, G. The internet of things: a survey. Computer Networks, Amsterdã, v. 54, n. 15, p. 2787-2805, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words: the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.
BALL, K.; DI DOMENICO, M.; NUNAN, D. Big data surveillance and the body-subject. Body & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 22, n. 2, p. 58-81, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15624973
BENNETT, J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
BOGOST, I. Persuasive games: the expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2007.
BOGOST, I. Unit operations: an approach to videogame criticism. Cambridge, MA; Londres: The MIT Press, 2008.
CALZADA, I.; COBO, C. Unplugging: deconstructing the smart city. Journal of Urban Technology, Abingdon, v. 22, n. 1, p. 23-43, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971535
CETINA, K. K. Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1-30, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001
CIPRIANI, J. Fitbit beats back competition with wellness program. Fortune, New York, 20 out. 2015. Disponível em: <https://for.tn/1hRl74n>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2017.
CLUSTER OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECTS. IoT: Internet of Things: strategic research roadmap. Bruxelas: European Commission, 2009.
DANAHER, J. The threat of algocracy: reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, Amsterdam, v. 29, n. 3, p. 245-269, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. Mil platôs: capitalismo e esquizofrenia. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1995. v. 1.
DOURISH, P. The internet of urban things. In: KITCHIN, R.; PERNG, S.-Y. (Ed.). Code and the city. London; New York: Routledge, 2016. p. 27-48.
ENGESTRÖM, J. Social objects: what beach balls and potatoes can teach us about social networks. SlideShare, Sunnyvale, 3 maio 2008. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2quLtAa>. Acesso em: 1º jul. 2013.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Ingestibles, wearables and embeddables. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, 30 jan. 2015. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2Ds9KiN>. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2017.
FINNEMANN, N. O. Digitization: new trajectories of mediatization? In: LUNDBY, K. (Ed.). Mediatization of communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2014. p. 297-322.
FITBIT. Fitbit announces Adam Pellegrini as vice president of digital health. Business Wire, San Francisco, 1º ago. 2016a. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2SV3kNz>. Acesso em: 1 jan. 2016.
FITBIT. Fitbit introduces “Fitbit Group Health” for corporate wellness, weight management programs, insurers and clinical research. Business Wire, São Francisco, 10 out. 2016b. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2QoLRvg>. Acesso em: 1º jan. 2016.
FITBIT. Form 10-K: for the fiscal year ended December 31. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, 29 fev. 2016c. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2fRKrtu>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.
FOTOPOULOU, A.; O’RIORDAN, K. Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 1, p. 54-68, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582
FOUCAULT. M. Dits et écrits : 1954-1988. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.
FUCHS, C. et al. Internet and surveillance: the challenges of web 2.0 and social media. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis, 2013.
GIUSTO, D. et al. (Ed.). The internet of things: 20th Tyrrhenian Workshop on Digital Communication. New York: Springer, 2010.
GREENFIELD, A. Everyware: the dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley: New Riders, 2006.
GREENGARD, S. The internet of things. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2015.
HARMAN, G. The quadruple object. Winchester; Washington, DC: Zero Books, 2011.
HOWARD, P. N. Pax technica: how the internet of things may set us free or lock us up. New Haven, CN; London: Yale University Press, 2015.
INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION. Worldwide quarterly wearable device tracker report 2016. Framingham: IDC, 2016. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2gubpW3>. Acesso em: 14 jan. 2017.
INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION. Worldwide quarterly wearable device tracker report 2017. Framingham: IDC, 2017. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2qCRRp8>. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2017.
KARIMOVA, G. Z.; SHIRKHANBEIK, A. Society of things: an alternative vision of internet of things. Cogent Social Sciences, London, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1115654, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2015.1115654
KENNEDY, H.; POELL, T.; VAN DIJCK, J. Data and agency. Big Data & Society, Thousand Oaks, n. 2015, p. 1-7, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621569
KITCHIN, R. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, Thousand Oaks, n. 2014, p. 1-12, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
KITCHIN, R. Reframing, reimaging and remaking smart cities. In: CREATING SMART CITIES: PROGRAMMABLE CITY PROJECT WORKSHOP, 2016, Maynooth. Proceedings… Maynooth: Maynooth University, 2016. p. 1-16.
KLAUSER, F. R.; ALBRECHTSLUND, A. From self-tracking to smart urban infrastructures: towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on big data. Surveillance & Society, Chapel Hill, v. 12, n. 2, p. 273-286, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4605
KRASNOGOR, N.; GUSTAFSON, S. Toward truly “memetic” memetic algo¬rithms: discussion and proofs of concept. In: ADVANCES IN NATURE-INSPIRED COMPUTATION: THE PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE WORKSHOPS, 7., 2002, Reading. Proceedings… Reading: University of Reading, 2002. p. 1-21.
LASSWELL, H. D. The structure and function of communication in society. The communication of ideas, New York, v. 37, p. 215-228, 1948.
LATOUR, B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
LATOUR, B. Uma sociologia sem objeto? observações sobre a interobjetividade. Valise, Porto Alegre, v. 5, n. 10, p. 165-187, 2015.
LEDGER, D.; MCCAFFREY, D. Inside wearables: how the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Medium, Cambridge, MA, 31 jan. 2014. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2SUzIjj>. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2018.
LEMKE, T. New materialisms: Foucault and the government of things. Theory, Culture & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 32, n. 4, p. 3-25, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413519340
LEMOS, A. A comunicação das coisas: teoria ator-rede e cibercultura. São Paulo: Annablume, 2013.
LEMOS, A. Sensibilités performatives : les nouvelles sensibilités des objets dans les métropoles contemporaines. Sociétés, De Boeck, v. 132, n. 2, p. 75-87, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/soc.132.0075
LEMOS, A.; BITENCOURT, E. I feel my wrist buzz: Smartbody and performa¬tive sensibility in Fitbit devices. Galáxia, São Paulo, n. 36, p. 5-17, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-2554232919
LEWIS, Z. H. et al. Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, London, n. 15, p. 585, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1947-3
LUNDBY, K. Mediatization of communication. In: ______. (Ed.). Mediatization of communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2014. p. 3-38.
LUPTON, D. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In: AUSTRALIAN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING FUTURES: THE FUTURE OF DESIGN, 26., 2014, Sydney. Proceedings… New York: ACM, 2014. p. 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686623
LUPTON, D. Personal data practices in the age of lively data. In: DANIELS, J.; GREGORY, K.; COTTOM, T. M. (Ed.). Digital sociologies. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2015. p. 3-16.
LUPTON, D. The quantified self: a sociology of self-tracking. Malden: Polity, 2016.
LYONS, E. J. et al. Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Toronto, v. 16, n. 8, p. e192, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3469
MANOVICH, L. Software takes command: international texts in critical media aesthetics. New York; London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
MARTIN, R. The internet of things (IoT): removing the human element. Infosec Writers, Chicago, 28 dez. 2015. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2Du88Fo>. Acesso em: 5 maio 2016.
MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.
MERCER, K. et al. Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Toronto, v. 4, n. 2, p. e40, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4461
MITEW, T. Do objects dream of an internet of things? The Fibreculture Journal, Londres, v. 23, n. 2014, p. 3-26, 2014.
MULANI, T. T.; PINGLE, S. V. Internet of things. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Pune, v. 2, n. 3, p. 1-4, 2016. Suplemento.
NANSEN, B. et al. An internet of social things. In: AUSTRALIAN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING FUTURES: THE FUTURE OF DESIGN, 26., 2014, Sydney. Proceedings… New York: ACM: ACM, 2014. p. 87-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686624
NASCIMENTO, L. C.; BRUNO, F. Quantified selves: contar, monitorar e conhecer a si mesmo através dos números. In: ENCONTRO DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM COMUNICAÇÃO, 22., 2013, Salvador. Anais… Salvador: Compós, 2013. p. 1-19.
OWEN, T. The violence of algorithms. Foreign Affairs, Congers, 25 maio 2015. Disponível em: <https://fam.ag/1esy3fK>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.
PAI, A. Fitbit revenues top $1.8B in 2015, added 1,000 enterprise customers for corporate wellness. Mobi Health News, Chicago, 23 fev. 2016. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2QuuwkL>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.
PAPACHARISSI, Z. A networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. London; New York: Routledge, 2010.
PAPATHANASSOPOULOS, S. Privacy 2.0. Social Media + Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-2, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578141
PTICEK, M.; PODOBNIK, V.; JEZIC, G. Beyond the internet of things: the social networking of machines. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, Thousand Oaks, n. 2016, p. 8178417, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8178417
RAIL, G.; JETTE, S. Reflections on biopedagogies and/of public health: on bio-others, rescue missions, and social justice. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, Thousans Oaks, v. 15, n. 5, p. 327-336, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708615611703
ROTHBERG, M. S. Disk drive for receiving setup data in a self monitoring analysis and reporting technology (SMART) command. Google Patents, Mountain View, 2005. Disponível em: <https://www.google.com/patents/US6895500>. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2018.
SHANNON, Claude E.; WEAVER, W. The mathematical theory of communica¬tion. 1949. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.
SMITH, G. J. D. Surveillance, data and embodiment: on the work of being watched. Body & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 22, n. 2, p. 108-139, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15623622
SMITH, G. J. D.; VONTHETHOFF, B. Health by numbers? exploring the practice and experience of datafied health. Health Sociology Review, Abingdon, v. 26, n. 1, p. 6-21, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196600
SOWE, S. K. et al. Managing heterogeneous sensor data on a big data platform: IoT services for data-intensive science. In: INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS, 38., 2014, Vasteras. Proceedings… New York: IEEE, 2014. p. 295-300. DOI: ht¬tps://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSACW.2014.52
TURKLE, S. Evocative objects: things we think with. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, 2007.
UCKELMANN, D.; HARRISON, M.; MICHAHELLES, F. (Ed.). Architecting the internet of things. Berlin: Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 2011.
VAN DIJCK, J. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scien¬tific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, Chapel Hill, v. 12, n. 2, p. 197-208, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
VAN KRANENBURG, R. The internet of things: a critique ambient technolo¬gy and the all-seeing network of RFID. Amsterdã: Institute of Network Cultures, 2008.
WEARABLE technology: unlocking ROI of workplace wellness contents: an em¬ployer case study in health care cost management. Springbuk, Indianápolis, 3 out. 2016. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2ATP5la>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2018.
WINNER, L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, Cambridge, MA, v. 109, n. 1, p. 121-136, inverno 1980.
WRIGHT, J.; HARWOOD, V. Biopolitics and the “obesity epidemic”: governing bodies. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.
ZDRAVKOVIĆ, M. et al. Survey of internet-of-things platforms. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGY, 6., 2016, Kopaonik. Proceedings… New York: ACM, 2016. p. 216-220.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui publient dans ce journal acceptent les termes suivants:
- Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, le travail étant concédé simultanément sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) qui permet le partage de l'œuvre avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue à des fins non commerciales.
- Les auteurs sont autorisés à assumer des contrats supplémentaires séparément, pour une distribution non exclusive de la version de l'ouvrage publiée dans cette revue (par exemple, publication dans un référentiel institutionnel ou en tant que chapitre de livre), avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue.
