O fracasso da mídia em representar a classe trabalhadora
as explicações da produção de mídia e mais além
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v11i3p17-37Mots-clés :
Classe trabalhadora, representação, mídia, Análise da Produção de MídiaRésumé
O artigo mostra que, embora a Análise da Produção de Mídia (APM) tenha negligenciado, na maioria das vezes, a classe, ela pode ser adaptada produtivamente para explicar as representações inadequadas da classe trabalhadora elaboradas pela mídia, desde que se baseie em: 1) uma compreensão dos fatores político-econômicos e políticos, além dos contextos situacionais, que podem ser observados ou descobertos por meio de entrevistas; 2) uma atenção a como as experiências subjetivas de classe dão forma à produção, através da combinação do conceito de habitus de Bourdieu com o reconhecimento das “posições de classe contraditórias” de Erik Olin Wright; 3) a atenção à mudança do status político da classe trabalhadora, e como isso pode moldar a produção e a representação.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Références
BENSON, R.; NEVEU, E. Bourdieu and the journalistic field. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
BERNSTEIN, B. Class, codes and control. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.
BIRESSI, A.; NUNN, H. Class and contemporary British culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
BORN, G. Uncertain vision: Birt, Dyke and the reinvention of the BBC. Londres: Secker & Warburg, 2005.
BOURDIEU, P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
______. The rules of art: genesis and structure of the literary field. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
BOURDIEU, P.; PASSERON, J.-C. Reproduction in education, society and culture. Londres: Sage, 1977.
CURRAN, J. Media and power. Londres: Routledge, 2002.
DENNING, M. The cultural front: the laboring of American culture in the twentieth century. Londres: Verso, 1996.
GILENS, M. Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of anti-poverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
HARDY, J. Critical political economy of the media: an introduction. Londres: Routledge, 2014.
HAVENS, T. Black television travels: African-American media around the globe. Nova Iorque: New York University Press, 2013.
HELSPER, E. J.; REISDORF, B. C. The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 19, n. 8, p. 1253-1270, 2016.
HESMONDHALGH, D. Media industry studies, media production studies. In: CURRAN, J. (Ed.). Media and society. 5. ed. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2010. p. 145-163.
______. The cultural industries. 3. ed. Londres: Sage, 2013.
HESMONDHALGH, D.; BAKER, S. Creative labour: media work in three cultural industries. Londres: Routledge, 2011.
JENSEN, T. Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy. Sociological Research Online, Thousand Oaks, v. 19, n. 3, p. 1-7, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3441
JENSEN, T.; TYLER, I. ‘Benefits broods’: the cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense. Critical Social Policy, Thousand Oaks, v. 35, n. 4, p. 470-491, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315600835
JONES, O. Chavs: the demonization of the working class. Londres: Verso, 2011.
______. Benefits Street: a healthy media would stand up to the powerful and wealthy. Ours targets the poor and voiceless. Independent, Londres, 8 jan. 2014. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/EczvE5>. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2017.
KELLY, M. Regulating the reproduction and mothering of poor women: the controlling image of the welfare mother in television news coverage of welfare reform. Journal of Poverty, Abingdon, v. 14, n. 1, p. 76-96, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875540903489447.
LAHIRE, B. The plural actor. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
LEWIS, T. TV transformations: revealing the makeover show. Londres: Routledge, 2009.
MARCHETTI, D. Subfields of specialized journalism. In: BENSON, R.; NEVEU, E. (Eds.). Bourdieu and the journalistic field. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. p. 64-84.
MAYER, V. Below the line: producers and production studies in the new television economy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
MILBURN, A. Fair access to professional careers. a progress report by the independent reviewer on social mobility and child poverty, [s.l.], 2012. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/thbjeM>. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2017.
MOSCO, V.; WASKO, J. (Eds.). The critical communications review – Volume 1: labor, the working class and the media. Nova Jérsei: Ablex, 1982.O’BRIEN, D. et al. Are the creative industries meritocratic? An analysis of the 2014 British Labour Force Survey. Cultural Trends, Abingdon, v. 25, n. 2, p. 116-131, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2016.1170943
O’BRIEN, D.; OAKLEY, K. Cultural value and inequality: a critical literature review. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council, 2015.
ORTNER, S. B. Studying sideways: ethnographic access in Hollywood. In V. MAYER (ed.). Production studies: cultural studies of media industries. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2011. p. 175-189.
RANDLE, K.; FORSON, C.; CALVELEY, M. Towards a bourdieusian analysis of the social composition of the UK film and television workforce. Work, Employment and Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 29, n. 4, p. 590-606, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014542498
REAY, D. The zombie stalking english schools: social class and educational inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies, Abingdon, v. 54, n. 3, p. 288-307, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00351.x
ROSE, J. The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.
ROSS, A. The mental labor problem. Social Text, Durham, v. 18, n. 2, p. 1-32, 2000.
______. The gulf: high culture/hard labour. Nova Iorque: OR Books, 2015.RYAN, B. Making capital from culture: the corporate form of capitalist cultural production. Berlim: Walter de Gruyter, 1992.
SAVAGE, M. Social class in the 21st century. Londres: Penguin Books, 2015.
SAYER, A. The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
SKEGGS, B.; WOOD, H. Reality television and class. Londres: BFI, 2011.
STIERNSTEDT, F.; JAKOBSSON, P. Ghettos and gated communities in the social landscape of television: representations of class in 1982 and 2015. In: WAYNE, M.; O’NEILL, D. (Eds.). Considering class:theory, culture and media in the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill, 2017. p. 255-272.
SUTTON TRUST. The educational backgrounds of leading journalists. [s.l.], 15 jun. 2006. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/8tnNwm>. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2017.
TYLER, I. Classificatory struggles: class, culture and inequality in neoliberal times. The Sociological Review, Londres, v. 63, n. 2, p. 493-511, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12296.
WEAVER, D. H.; WILHOIT, G. C. The American journalist in the 1990s. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
WEININGER, E. B.; LAREAU, A. Translating Bourdieu into the American context: the question of social class and family-school relations. Poetics, Amsterdam, v. 31, n. 5, p. 375-402, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00034-2.
WILKINSON, R.; PICKETT, K. The spirit level. Londres: Penguin, 2009.WILLIAMS, R. Culture. Londres: Fontana, 1981.WRIGHT, E. O. Intellectuals and the class structure of capitalist society. In: WALKER, P. (Ed.). Between labor and capital. Boston: South End Press, 1979. p. 191-211.
______. Class counts: comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui publient dans ce journal acceptent les termes suivants:
- Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, le travail étant concédé simultanément sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) qui permet le partage de l'œuvre avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue à des fins non commerciales.
- Les auteurs sont autorisés à assumer des contrats supplémentaires séparément, pour une distribution non exclusive de la version de l'ouvrage publiée dans cette revue (par exemple, publication dans un référentiel institutionnel ou en tant que chapitre de livre), avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue.