Desenvolvimento após o divórcio como estratégia de crescimento humano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19908Palabras clave:
adulto, divórcio, desenvolvimento, trajetórias desenvolvimentaisResumen
O divórcio é um dos momentos mais estressantes na vida dos adultos. Após a dissolução conjugal, os ex-parceiros têm de enfrentar inúmeras mudanças e desafios. A literatura psicológica tem dado prioridade ao estudo das consequências negativas do divórcio nas trajetórias desenvolvimentais de todos os membros da família, através da pesquisa exaustiva de problemas de ajustamento que provariam que o divórcio é por si só um factor de desestabilização e risco psicopatológico. No entanto, atualmente, surgem linhas de investigação que se distanciam desta visão, para se focalizarem nas possibilidades de desenvolvimento positivo que podem germinar com a decisão de divórcio. Desta forma, a adaptação ao divórcio não é vista como um processo cumulativo de perdas mas, pelo contrário, como um potencial processo qualitativo caracterizado por novos objetivos de vida, melhoria de competências e maior maturidade afetiva e íntima. O presente artigo propõe uma conceptualização da adaptação ao divórcio como podendo ser medida através do resultado qualitativo de uma sequência de mudanças desenvolvimentais integradas, em que os níveis mais avançados de desenvolvimento, e de um certo modo também mais diferenciados, devem integrar e ultrapassar os níveis anteriores e mais instrumentais da adaptação ao divórcio. São também apresentadas as dificuldades teóricas existentes na literatura em definir o conceito de desenvolvimento ótimo, bem como os procedimentos metodológicos usados para compreender estas trajetórias de crescimento humano.Descargas
Referencias
Hetherington EM, Kelly J. For better or for the worse: divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton; 2002.
Ahrons C, Rodgers R. Divorced families: a multidisciplinary developmental view. New York: Norton; 1987.
Bergler E. Divorce won’t help. New York: Hart Publishing Company; 1948.
Bailey J, Robbins S. Couple empowerment in divorce: a comparison of mediated and no mediated outcomes. Conflict Resolution Quartely. 2005;22(4): 453-472.
Kaslow F, Hyatt R. Divorce: a potential growth experience for the extended family. J Divorce. 1982; 6: 115-125.
Pals J. Narrative identity processing of difficult life experiences: pathways of personality development and positive self-transformation in adulthood. J Personality. 2006; 74(4): 1079-1109.
Amato P. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. J Marriage and Family. 2000; 62: 1269-1287.
Hetherington E. An overview of the Virginia Longitudinal Study of divorce and remarriage with a focus on early adolescence. J Family Psychology. 1993; 7: 39-56.
Pledge D. Marital separation/divorce: a review of individual responses to a major life stressor. J Divorce Remarriage. 1992; 17(3/4): 151-181.
Simon R, Marcussen K. Maritaltransitions, marital beliefs, and mental health. J Health Social Behavior. 1999; 40: 111-125.
Doherty W, Su S, Needle R. Marital disruption and psychological well-being. J Family Issues. 1989; 10(1): 72-85.
Swepper S. Adult adjustment to relationship separation [Dissertação].Griffith: Griffith University; 2004.
Shapiro A. Explaining psychological distress in a sample of remarried and divorced persons. J Family Issues. 1996; 17: 186-203.
Verbrugge L. Marital status and health. J Marriage and the Family.1979; 49: 267-285.
Cantor C, Sltator P. Marital break down, parenthood, and suicide. J Family Studies. 1995; 1: 91-102.
Milardo RM. Comparative methods for delineating social networks. J Social and personal Relationships. 1992;9: 447-461.
Sayer LC. Economic aspects of divorce and relationship dissolution. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p.385-406.
Uunk W. The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: the impact of welfare state arrangements. Eur J Population. 2004; 20: 251-285.
Booth A, Amato P. Divorce and psychological stress. J Health Social Behaviour. 1991; 32:396:407.
Kiecolt-Glaser J, et al. Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine 1988; 50: 213-229.
Baum N, Rahav G, Sharon D. Changes in the self-concepts of divorced women. J Divorce Remarriage. 2005; 43(1/2): 47-67.
Birnbaum G, et al. When marriage breaks up – does attachment style contribute to coping and mental health. J Social Personal Relationships. 1997; 14: 643-654.
Gardner J, Oswald A. Do divorcing couples become happier by breaking up? J Royal Statistical Society: Series A 2006; 169(2): 319-336.
Holmes T, Rahe R. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosomatic Research. 1967; 4: 189-194.
Counts R, Sacks A. The need for crisis intervention during marital separation.1985; 30(2): 146-150.
Tashiro T, Frazier P, Berman M. Stress-related growth following divorce and relationship dissolution. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p.361-384.
Hetherington EM. Intimate pathways: changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations. 2003; 52(4): 318-331.
Clarke-Stewart A, Brentano C. Divorce: causes and consequences. 1.ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006.
O’Leary M, et al. Divorcing parents: factors related to coping and adjustment. J Divorce and Remarriage. 1996; 25: 85-103.
Hilton J, Desrochers S. The influence of economic strain, coping with roles, and parental control on the parenting of custodial single mothers and custo dial single fathers. J Divorce Remarriage. 2000; 33(3/4): 55-76.
Madden-Derdich D, Leonard S,Christopher F. Boundary ambiguity and Copa rental conflict after divorce: an empirical of a family systems model of the divorce process. J Marriageand Family. 1999; 61(3): 588-598.
Graff-Reed R. Positive effects of stressful events: psychological growth following divorce [dissertação]. Miami: Miami University; 2004.
Masten A. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. American Psychologist. 2001; 56(3): 227-238.
Lerner R, Dowling E, Chaudhuri J. Methods of contextual assessment and assessing contextual methods: a developmental systems perspective. InTeti D, organizador. Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science; 2004. p. 183-209.
Rollie S, Duck S. Divorce and dissolution of romantic relationships: stage models and their limitations. In: Fine M, Harvey J, organizadores. Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. Hahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 223-240.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Anuário estatístico de Portugal 2006. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística; 2007.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas do registro civil 2006. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2007.
Ressler R, Waters, M. Female earnings and the divorce rate: a simultaneous equations model. Applied Economics.2000; 32(14): 1889-1898.
Allen D. No-fault divorce in Canada: itscause and effect. J Economic Behavior Organization. 1998; 37:129-149.
Rasul I. The impact of divorce laws on marriage [manuscrito não publicado].Londres: University College; 2006.
Mechoulan S. Divorce laws and the structure of the American family. The Journal of Legal Studies. 2006; 35: 143-174.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
