Prevalence and factors associated with functional dependency in homebound elderly people in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.127747Palabras clave:
Homebound Elderly, Functional Dependence, Family Health Strategy.Resumen
Introduction: Population ageing is a worldwide reality that requires attention, and a concern for healthy and functional ageing is increasingly the focus of government policies and programmes.
Objective: To identify the prevalence of homebound elderly people, and the influence of sociodemographic and economic characteristics on their functional dependency.
Methods: Cross-sectional study with 178 homebound elderly people assisted by a family healthcare unit in Vitória, ES, Brazil. Functional independence was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the sociodemographic and economic variables were collected by a questionnaire developed by the authors. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the influence of the sociodemographic and economic characteristics on the risk of being functionally dependent.
Results: Forty-eight percent of the participants were functional dependents, 80% were female, 72% belonged to the fourth age, 74% were white, 63% were widowed, 78% had retired, 90% had children, 83% had a caregiver, 52% had low education and 40% had low income. Logistic regression indicated that having a caregiver increased by 40 times the chance of being functionally dependent (OR = 40.2; 95%CI 4.8–355.4) and having between one to eight years of education decreased the chance of functional dependency (OR = 0.2; 95%CI 0.04-0.9).
Conclusions: The prevalence of functional dependency was very high in this sample, and since the presence of a caregiver was the strongest and significant predictor of functional dependency, we suggest that guidance and support should be offered to caregivers, followed by a family healthcare strategy, to make consistent efforts with the objective of improving functional recovery and independence of homebound elderly.
Descargas
Referencias
World Health Organization (WHO). World health statistics 2014: a wealth of information on global public health. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios – PNAD 2012. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria nº 2.528, de 19 de outubro de 2006. Institui a Política Nacional de Saúde da Pessoa Idosa. Diário Oficial da União 20 nov. 2006.
Mattos IE, do Carmo CN, Santiago LM, Luz LL. Factors associated with functional incapacity in elders living in long stay institutions in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-47
Alves LC, Leite IC, Machado CJ. Factors associated with functional disability of elderly in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010;44(3):468-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010005000009
Gratão ACM, Talmelli LFS, Figueiredo LC, Rosset I, Freitas CP, Rodrigues RAP. Functional dependency of older individuals and caregiver burden. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(1):134–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342013000100017
Guerra RO, Alvarado BE, Zunzunegui MV. Life course, gender and ethnic inequalities in functional disability in a Brazilian urban elderly population. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(1):53-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03324748
Parahyba MI, Simões CCS. Disability prevalence among the elderly in Brazil. Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 2006;11(4):967-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232006000400018
Ursine PGS, Cordeiro HA, Moraes CL. Prevalence of housebound elderly people in the urban region of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16(6):2953-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000600033
Petitpierre NJ, Trombetti A, Carroll I, Michel JP, Herrmann FR. The FIM instrument to identify patients at risk of falling in geriatric wards: a 10-year retrospective study. Age Ageing. 2010;39(3):326-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq010
Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jucá SSH, Sakamoto H, Pinto PPN, Battistella LR. Validation of the Brazilian version of Functional Independence Measure. Acta Fisiatr. 2004;11(2):3-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20140066
Macêdo AML, Cerquiari EAN, Alvarenga MRM, Faccenda O, Oliveira MAC. Functional assessment of elderly with cognitive deficit. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012;25(3):358-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002012000300007
Ricci NA, Kubota MT, Cordeiro RC. Agreement between observations on the functional capacity of home care elderly patients. Rev Saúde Públ. 2005;39(4):655-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102005000400021
World Health Organization (WHO). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
Lopes AB, Gazzola JM, Lemos ND, Riccid NA. Functional independence and factors that influence it in the scope of home care to elderly people. Rev Bras Geriatr e Gerontol. 2007;10(3):285-300.
Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, Ritchie CS, Federman AD, Roberts L, et al. Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1180-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849
Doubova Dubova SV, Pérez-Cuevas R, Espinosa-Alarcón P, Flores-Hernández S. Social network types and functional dependency in older adults in Mexico. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-104
Musich S, Wang SS, Hawkins K, Yeh CS. Homebound older adults: Prevalence, characteristics, health care utilization and quality of care. Geriatr Nurs. 2015;36(6):445-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.06.013
Sudré MRS, Reiners AAO, Azevedo RCS, Floriano LA. Socioeconomic and health conditions of the elderly assisted by Family Health Teams. Cienc Cuid Saúde. 2015;14(1):933-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v14i1.19794
Lage JSS, Okuno MFP, Campanharo CRV, Lopes MCBT, Batista REA. Functional capacity and profile of elderly people at emergency units. REME Rev Min Enferm. 2014;18(4):861-5.
Nardi EFR, Sawada NO, Santos JLF. The association between the functional incapacity of the older adult and the family caregiver’s burden. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2013;21(5):1096-103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692013000500012
Mota LB, Aguiar AC, Caldas CP. The Family Health Strategy and healthcare for the elderly: experiences in three Brazilian cities. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011:27(4);779-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000400017
Oliveira JCA, Tavares DMS. Elderly attention to health strategy in the family: action of nurses. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010;44(3):163-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342010000300032
Muniz EA, Freitas CASL, Alburquerque IMN, Linhares MSC. Home nursing of the elderly in the context of the Family Health Strategy: analysis of scientific production. SONARE. 2014;13(2):86-91.
Carvalho VCHS, Rossato SL, Fuchs FD, Harzheim E, Fuchs SC. Assessment of primary health care received by the elderly and health related quality of life: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:605. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-605
Bezerra IMP, Sorpreso ICE. Concepts and movements in health promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26(1):11-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113709
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
