WAIST/HEIGHT RATIO: A MARKER OF NUTRITIONAL ALTERATION IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.88962Keywords:
waist circumference, obesity, overweight, adiposity, preschool.Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of obesity in Brazil is progressively increasing among children. In obese individuals, the concentration of fat in the abdominal region is a predictive marker for future health problems. Among the indicators of central adiposity, the waist-to-height ratio (WHR) has been shown to be more sensitive for predicting future health hazards than waist circumference alone. Objective: To analyze the relationship between the WHR and the classification of nutritional status of preschool children. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 711 preschool children in daycare in Taubate, SP. The sampling was probabilistic, having the nursery as the sampling unit. The weight, height and waist circumference of each child were measured. For classifying children with excess weight (risk of overweight, overweight or obesity), or with overweight or obesity the cut-off points of the Z-scores of Body Mass Index (zBMI), proposed by the Ministry of Health (2009), were used, from the point of view of the World Health Organization. The data were analyzed using the ROC (Receiver Operator Curve). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of WHR for excess weight was 0.851 (p< 0.0001), and for overweight or obesity together was 0.886 (p< 0.0001). Values of 0.52 and 0.54 of the WHR were the cut-off points for optimization of Sensitivity/Specificity respectively for excess weight or overweight or obesity. Conclusion: The WHR is a useful tool in basic health care for children at the beginning of preschool age, for the assessment of nutritional status and central adiposity.
Downloads
References
Nascimento, VG et al. Prevalência de sobrepeso em crianças pré-escolares em creches públicas: um estudo transversal. Sao Paulo Med J 2012,130(4): 225-229.
Heseker H, Schmid A. Epidemiology of obesity. Ther Umsch 2000, 57(8):478-81.
Wyatt HR. The prevalence of obesity. Prim Care 2003, 30(2):267-79.
Stolk RP, Wink O, Zelissen PM, Meijer R, van Gils AP, Grobbee DE. Validity and reproducibility of ultrasonography for the measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001, 25:1346-51.
Erselcan T, Candan F, Saruhan S, Ayca T. Comparison of body composition analysis methods in clinical routine. Ann Nutr Metab 2000, 44:243-8.
Sousa TF et al. Fatores associados à obesidade central em adultos de Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2011, 14(2): 296-309.
Giugliano R, Melo ALP. Diagnóstico de sobrepeso e obesidade em escolares: utilização do índice de massa corporal segundo padrão internacional. J Pediatr 2004; 80:129:34.
Ashwell M. Obesity risk: importance of the waist-to-height ratio. Nursing Standard 2009; 23(41): 49-54.
Ashwell M, Hsieh SD. Six reasons why the waistto-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2005;
(5): 303-7.
Pitanga FJG, Lessa I. Razão cintura-estatura como discriminador do risco coronariano de adultos. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2006; 52(3):157-61.
Haun DR, Pitanga FJG, Lessa I. Razão cintura/estatura comparado a outros indicadores antropométricos de obesidade como preditor de risco coronariano elevado. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2009; 55(6): 705-11.
OMS. Obesidade: prevenindo e controlando a epidemia global. Relatório da consultoria da OMS. Tradução: Andréa Favano; revisão científica: Sérgio Setsuo Maeda. São Paulo: Roca; 2004.
Must A, Hollander SA, Economos CD. Childhood obesity: a growing public health concern. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2006; 1: 233-54.
Savva SC, Tornaristis M, Savva ME, Kourides Y, Panagi A, Silikiotou N, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24:1453-8.
Kahn HS, Imperatore G, Cheng YJ. A population based comparison of BMI percentiles and waistto-height ratio for identifying cardiovascular risk in youth. J Pediatr 2005; 146:482-8.
McCarthy HD, Ashwell M. A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message – ‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2006; 30: 988-92.
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Matorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. 1988. Ilinois: Human Kinetics Publishers.
World Health Organization. Measuring change in nutritional status. Geneva; WHO; 1993. 101 p.
Ministry of Health (Ministério da Saúde). Department of Basic Care, http://nutricao.saude.gov.br/sisvan.php?conteudo=curvas_cresc_oms Accessed on 01/08/2009.
Sinaiko AR, Donahue RP, Jacobs DR, Prineas RJ. Relation of weight and rate of increase in weight during childhood and adolescence to body size, blood pressure, fasting insulin, and lipids in young adults. The Minneapolis
Childrens Blood Pressure Study. Circulation 1999; 99:1471-6.
Nathan BM, Moran A. Metabolic complications of obesity in childhood and adolescence: more than just diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008;15:21-9.
Morrison JA, Friedman LA, Harlan WR, Harlan LC, Barton BA, Schreiber GB, et al. Development of the metabolic syndrome in black and white adolescent girls: a longitudinal assessment. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1178-82.
Botton J, Heude B, Kettaneh A, Borys JM, Lommez A, Bresson JL, et al. Cardiovascular risk factor levels and their relationships with overweight and fat distribution in children: the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante II study.
Metabolism. 2007;56: 614-22.
Schisterman EF, Faraggi D, Reiser B, Trevisan M. Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:174-9.
Atrash HK, Carpentier R. The evolving role of public health in the delivery of health care. J. Hum. Growth Dev. 2012; 22(3): 396-399.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis