FAMILY ENVIRONMENT AND RISK CONDITIONS FOR DRUG USE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.40000Keywords:
Drug use. University students. Risk factors. Family environment.Abstract
Objective. To indentify family environment risk factors for drug use in undergraduate students from 21 courses at the University of São Paulo (USP), in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed using data from 11 variables, in an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire, which was answered by 2,564 randomly sampled students. For the dependent variable ‘drug use’, the following drugs were considered: marijuana, hallucinogens, cocaine, crack, amphetamines, anticholinergics, inhalants, tranquilizers, anxiolytics, antidystonics, opiates, sedatives, barbiturates, and anabolizers. Results. In the sample, the user (compared with thenon-user) is male (29.3%), 20-24 years old (29.4%), single (27.3%), work (28.7%), lives alone (34.9%) or with friends (36.4%), do not have a religion (33.4%), or at least do not practicise it (29.7%), have some difficulty communicating with his parents, particulariy with his mother (17.2%).This resuited in
a model that revealed a drug use risk profiie according to the characteristics of famiiy environment, in which 9 factors remained: famiiy income, parents levei of instruction, frequent use of alcohol by mother and brothers, frequent use of drugs by both parents and brothers.
Downloads
References
Lins e Silva T. Produção e consumo de drogas no contexto sócio-político contemporâneo. In: Bastos FI e Gonçalves O, organizadores. Só socialmente: os fatores psicoativos nas relações humanas através dos tempos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará; 1992. p.51-56.
Leukefeld CG, Bukoski WJ, editors. An introduction to drug abuse prevention intervention research: methodological issues. Rockville: NIDA; 1991.p.1-ó.
Galduróz JCF, D’Almeida V, Carvalho V, Carlini EA. III Levantamento sobre o uso de drogas entre estudantes de lo. e 2O. graus em 10 capitais brasileiras - 1993. São Paulo: CEBRID/Depto. de Psicobiologia/ Escola Paulista de Medicina; 1994.
Magalhães MP, Barros RS, Silva MTA. Uso de drogas entre universitários: a experiência com maconha como fator delimitante. Rev ABP-APAL 1991; 13 (3): 97-104.
Mesquita AMC, Butaretchi HA, Castel S, Andrade AG. Estudantes da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo: uso de substancias psicoativas em 1991. Rev ABP-APAL 1995; 17(2): 47-54.
Bucher R. Drogas e drogadição no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992.
Queiroz S. Fatores relacionados ao uso de drogas e condições de risco entre os alunos de graduação da Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo; 2000. [Tese de Doutorado – Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP].
Carlini EA, Carlini-Cotrim B, Silva-Filho AR. Sugestões para programas de prevenção ao abuso de drogas no Brasil. São Paulo: CEBRID- Escola Paulista de Medicina; 1990.
Smart RG, Hughes P, Johnston LD, Anumonye A, Khant U, Mora MEM, et al. A methodology for student drug-use surveys. Geneva: WHOOff set Publication; 1980.
Moss HB, Bonicatto S, Kirisci L, Girardelli AM, Murrelle L. Substance abuse and associated psychosocial problems among Argentina adolescents: sex, heterogeneity and familial transmission. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998; 52(3):221-30.
Jackson C, Henriksen L, Dickinson D, LevineDW. Early use of alcohol and tobacco: relation to child competence and parental behavior. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 359-64.
Hops H, Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Stoolmiller M. Parent substance use as a predictor of adolescent use: a six-year lagged analysis. Ann Behav Med 1996; 18(3):157-64.
Swan N. Early childhood behavior and temperament predict later substance use. NIDA Notes [on line]1995; 10(1):[5 screenings].Available from: http://165.112.78.61/NIDA_Notes/NNVOLlON1/ Earlychild html [1998 April 9].
Blackson T, Tarter R. Individual, family, and peer affiliation factors predisposing to early-age onset of alcohol and drug use. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1994; 18(4): 813-21.
Nazar-Beutelspacher A, Tapia-Conyer R, Villa Romero A, Leon Alvarez G, Medina-Mora ME, Savatierra-Izaba B. Factores asociados ai consumo de drogas en adolescentes de áreas urbanas de México. Salud Publica Mex. 1994;36:646-54.
Freud S. Obras completas. Trad. Torres LLB. 3ªed. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva; 1972. Psicologiade las masas y analisis del yo; p. 2563-2610.
Aberastury A, Salas EJ. A paternidade: um enfoque ; psicanalítico. 3ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1991.
Molina B, Chassin L, Curran P. Comparisons of mechanisms underlying substance use for early adolescent children of alcoholics and controls. J Stud Alcohol 1994; 55(3): 269-75.
Smith C, Lizotte AJ, Thornberry TP, Krohn MD. Resilient youth: identifying factors that prevent high-risk youth from engaging in delinquency and drug use. In: Hagan J, editor. Delinquency and disrepute in the life course. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1995. p. 217-47.
Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adult hood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 64-105.
D’Assumpção EA. Um perfil do uso de drogas entre estudantes universitários. Folha Med. 1988; 97(5/6):309-12.
Villa JAP, director. Estudio National de Salud Mental y Consumo de Substancias Psicoactivas - Colombia 1993. 2ª ed. Santaféde Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud; 1995.
Yamaguchi K, Kandel DB. Patterns of drugus e from adolescence to young adulthood: III. Predictors of progression. Am J Public Health1984; 74(7): 673-81.
Khavari KA. Interpersonal Influences in College students initial use of alcohol and drugs: the role of friends, self, parents, doctors, and dealers. Int J Addict 1993; 28(4): 377-88.
Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Alpert A, Hops H, Stoolmiller M, Muth NB. Latent variable ode ling of longitudinal and multilevel substance use data. Multivariate Behav Res. 1997;32:275-318.
Bachman JG, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Humphrey RH. Explaining the recent decline on marijuana use: differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. J Health Soe Behav. 1988; 29: 92-112.
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG. National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1997. V.1:Secondary school students. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1998.
Prendergast ML. Substance use and abuse among college students: a review of recent literature. J Am Coll Health 1994; 43: 99-113.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
