SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT FORMATION IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN

Authors

  • Christianne Thatzana Ramos de Souza
  • José Moysés Alves

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39598

Keywords:

concept development, zone of proximal development, child education.

Abstract

The study of scientific concept formation among pre-school children allows the investigation of concepts related to life experience, as well as tbe analysis of transformations in
their meanings. This study investigated the development of scientific concepts in 20 pre-schoolers (ages four and five), taking into account their real and potential leveis of development. Each child was assessed twice on the following concepts: animal and vegetable; vertebrate and invertebrate; mammals, birds and fishes, with each session being inserted between instruction periods. During ~e second assessment, correct concept grouping occurred more frequently, as
well as the use of abstract categories in naming and defining classes. Instructional activities that were carried out between ~e two assessments expanded the children’s zones of proximal
development, thereby fostering the evolution of these concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Christianne Thatzana Ramos de Souza
    Graduanda do Curso de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Pará.
  • José Moysés Alves
    Professor Doutor do Departamento de Psicologia Exp^ffimenta^l da Universidade Federal do Pará.

References

Cavalcante Z. Conhecimentos de adultos. Saberes de crianças. In: Cavalcante Z.(Coord.). Trabalhando com a história e ciências na pré-escola. Porto Alegre, Ed. Artes Médicas, 1995. p. 3-11.

Delizoicov D, Angotti JA. Metodologia do Ensino de Ciências. São Paulo, Ed. Cortez, 1994.

Di Martino ER. O ciclo básico e o ensino de ciências: uma tomada de consciência. In: Secretaria da Educação, Coordenadoria de Estudos e Normas Pedagógicas, São Paulo. A criança e o conhecimento: retomando a proposta pedagógica do ciclo básico. São Paulo, SE / CENP (Projeto IPÊ), 1991. p. 44-54.

Kramer S. (Org.). Com a pré-escola nas mãos: uma alternativa curricular para a educação infantil. São Paulo, Ed. Ática, 1994.

Moraes R. Ciências para as séries iniciais e alfabetização. Porto Alegre, Ed. Sagra, 1995.

Natadze G. A aprendizagem dos conceitos científicos na escola. In: AR Luria, AN Leontiev, LS Wgotsky LS, et al. Psicologia e Pedagogia II: investigações experimentais sobre problemas didáticos específicos. Lisboa, Editorial Estampa, 1991. p.27-34.

Oliveira MK. Vygotsky e o processo de formação de conceitos. In: La Taille Y, Oliveira MK, Dantas H. (Org.). Piaget, Vygotsky e Wallon: teorias psicogenéticas em discussão. São Paulo, Ed. Summus, 1992. p.23-34.

Panofsky CR, John-Steiner V, Blackwell RJ. O desenvolvimento do discurso e dos conceitos científicos. In: Moll LC. (Org.). Vygotsky e a educação: implicações pedagógicas da psicologia sócio-histórica. Porto Alegre, Ed. Artes Médicas, 1996. p.245-260.

Vygotsky LS. A formação social da mente. São Paulo, Ed. Martins Fontes, 1984.Vygotsky LS. Pensamento e linguagem. São Paulo, Ed. Martins Fontes, 1987.

Downloads

Published

2000-06-19

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2000)

Section

Original/Atualização

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis