The place of the family in the social network of leisure after retirement

Authors

  • Raquel Pedreira da Cruz Azevedo Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Psicologia
  • Ana Maria Almeida Carvalho Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Psicologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19804

Keywords:

Leisure, Retirement, Family

Abstract

This paper aims at the identification of the place of the family in the social networks of leisure relationships constructed in the phase of retirement. In-depth interviews were conducted with six retired participants of both genders, married, receiving private complementary retirement wages and affiliated with Retired People Associations. The results suggest that the social networks of leisure in this phase focus on the extended family group (adult sons and daughters, sons- and daughters-in-law and grandchildren), favoring intergenerational relationships. They also indicate a reduction in the expansion of extra-family relationships, with increased selectivity towards new friendships and consolidation of old friendships, and the emergence of parental solidarity due to greater availability of time to care for others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Iwanowicz JB. O lazer do idoso e o desenvolvimento prossocial. In: Bruhuns HT, organizador. Temas sobre o lazer. Campinas: Autores Associados; 2000. p. 101-129.

Neri AL. Qualidade de vida e idade madura. São Paulo: Papirus; 2001.

Parker S. A sociologia do lazer. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar; 1978.

Cerveny CMO. Visitando a família ao longo do ciclo vital. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2002.

Dumazedier J. A revolução cultural do tempo livre. São Paulo: Studio Nobel; 1994.

Dumazedier J. Sociologia empírica do lazer. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 1979.

Da Matta R. A casa e a rua. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco; 1997.

Motta AB. Sociabilidades possíveis: idoso e tempo geracional. In: Peixoto CE, organizador. Família e envelhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV; 2004. p. 109-44.

Peixoto CE. Envelhecimento e imagem: as fronteiras entre Paris e Rio de Janeiro. São Paulo: Annablume; 2000.

Downloads

Published

2006-12-01

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2006)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis