Knowledge and use of the ICF in clinical practice by physiotherapists and occupational therapists of Minas Gerais

Authors

  • Andrei Pereira Pernambuco Universidade de Itaúna. MG. Brasil
  • Raquel de Carvalho Lana Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG) - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Janaíne Cunha Polese Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG) - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/16765225022018

Keywords:

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Surveys and Questionnaires

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the profile and knowledge of physiotherapists and occupational therapists from Minas Gerais about the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) application in professional practice, trying to understand the reason for the underutilization of this universal instrument in Brazil. Observational and cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire prepared by specialists. An email was sent to all physiotherapists and occupational therapists enrolled in the Regional Council of the 4th Region. Of 22,121 emails, 1,313 were answered. 53% of the sample had graduate certificate, 65% had between two to ten years of experience, and 62% reported that clinics and patients’ houses are the places where they work. 72% of the professionals knew the ICF and 84% correctly answered the meaning of the acronym. However, 71% of professionals are unaware of the fields that make up this classification. The first contact with the ICF happened during graduation to 50% of professionals, and 28% had never had contact with ICF. 74% reported not using it in clinical practice. However, 82% of the participants believed that the use of ICF is viable in clinical practice. Most professionals had graduate certificate, worked in clinics and patients’ homes and, although most of them claim to know the ICF, the largest portion of the sample reported they did not use this classification in their professional lives, even though believing the ICF use is feasible. The lack of knowledge about the ICF prevents professionals from complying with the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Brazilian National Health Council (CNS) and COFFITO (Brazilian Federal Council of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy) on the adoption of this instrument in exchange of information about health and clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Towards a common language

for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, 2002.

Available from: https://bit.ly/2Bsb4OT

Ferreira LTD, Castro SS, Buchalla CM. The International

Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: progress

and opportunities. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2014;19(2):469-74.

doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014192.04062012

Organização Mundial da Saúde. Classificação Internacional

de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. Vol 1. São Paulo:

Edusp; 2003.

Levack W. The International Classification of Functioning,

Disability and Health (ICF): application to physiotherapy. NZ

J Physiother. 2004;32(1):1-2.

Araujo ES, Buchalla CM. O uso da classificação internacional de

funcionalidade incapacidade e saúde em inquéritos de saúde:

uma reflexão sobre limites e possibilidades. Rev Bras Epidem.

;18(3):720-4. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201500030017

Schraner I, De Jonge D, Layton N, Bringolf J, Molenda

A. Using the ICF in economic analyses of Assistive

Technology systems: methodological implications of a user

standpoint. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(12-13):916-26. doi:

1080/09638280701800293

Sabino GS, Coelho CM, Sampaio RF. Utilização da

Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade

e Saúde na avaliação fisioterapêutica de indivíduos com

problemas musculoesqueléticos nos membro inferiores e

região lombar. Acta Fisiátr. 2008;15(1):24-30.

Stucki G, Melvin J. The International Classification of

Functioning, Disability and Health: a unifying model for

the conceptual description of physical and rehabilitation

medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):286-92. doi:

2340/16501977-0041

Steiner W, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann

A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problemsolving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine.

Phys Ther. 2002;82(11):1098-107. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.11.1098

Organização Mundial da Saúde. Resolução nº 54.21, de 22

de maio de 2001. Aprovada pela 54ª.

Assembleia Mundial da

Saúde. Genebra; 2001.

Conselho Federal de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional –

COFFITO. Resolução nº 370, de 6 de novembro de 2009.

Dispõe sobre a adoção da Classificação Internacional de

Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) da Organização

Mundial de Saúde por Fisioterapeutas e Terapeutas

Ocupacionais. Brasília, DF; 2009.

Conselho Nacional de Saúde – CNS. Resolução nº 452,

de 10 de maio de 2012. Brasília, DF; 2012. Available from:

https://bit.ly/2HXuqSr

Ruaro JA, Ruaro MB, Souza DE, Frez AR, Guerra RO. An

overview and profile of the ICF’s use in Brazil: a decade

of history. Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16(6):454-62. doi:

1590/S1413-35552012005000063

Wiegand NM, Belting J, Fekete C, Gutenbrunner C,

Reinhardt JD. All talk, no action?: The global diffusion and

clinical implementation of the international classification of

functioning, disability and health. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.

;91(7):550-60. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825597e5

Bispo Junior JP. Formação em fisioterapia no Brasil: reflexões

sobre a expansão do ensino e os modelos de formação.

Hist Ciênc Saúde-Manguinhos 2009;16:655-68. doi:

1590/S0104-59702009000300005

Coury H, Vilella I. Perfil do pesquisador fisioterapeuta

brasileiro. Braz J Phys Ther. 2009;13:356-63. doi:

1590/S1413-35552009005000048

Farrell J, Anderson S, Hewitt K, Livingston MH, Stewart

D. A survey of occupational therapists in Canada about

their knowledge and use of the ICF. Can J Occup Ther.

:74(Suppl 5):221-32. doi: 10.1177/000841740707405S01

Jacob T. The implementation of the ICF among Israeli

rehabilitation centers: the case of physical therapy.

Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29(7):536-46. doi:

3109/09593985.2013.765935

Escorpizo R, Stucki G, Cieza A, Davis K, Stumbo T, Riddle DL.

Creating an interface between the International Classification

of Functioning, Disability and Health and physical

therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2010;90(7):1053-63. doi:

2522/ptj.20090326

Araujo ES. CIF: uma discussão sobre linearidade no modelo

biopsicossocial. Fisioter Saúde Func. 2013;2(1):6-13.

Maini M, Nocentini U, Prevedini A, Giardini A, Muscolo

E. An Italian experience in the ICF implementation in

rehabilitation: preliminary theoretical and practical

considerations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(15):1146-52. doi:

1080/09638280701478397

Pless M, Granlund M. Implementation of the International

Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

and the ICF Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) within the

context of augmentative and alternative communication.

Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(1):11-20. doi:

3109/07434618.2011.654263

Zhang HX, Enderby P, Sang L. Application of the

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and

Health in China. Chin Med J. 2011;124(21):3588-91. doi:

3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.21.027

Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in

rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(17):932-8.

doi: 10.1080/09638280210148594

Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN. Assessing response rates

and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res Higher

Educ. 2003;44(4):409-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1024232915870

Downloads

Published

2018-07-07

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Knowledge and use of the ICF in clinical practice by physiotherapists and occupational therapists of Minas Gerais. (2018). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 25(2), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/16765225022018