On the unity of Schelling's philosophy: a systematic perspective based on the constructive method (1801-1810)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v25i4p191-208Keywords:
Schelling, identity, freedom, system, absoluteAbstract
The aim of this paper is to argue that there is a unity between texts considered to belong to the real part and the ideal part of Schelling's philosophy. Thus, we will demonstrate that the main criticism of his identity system, of not conceiving the subsistence of the finite in the Absolute, did not present itself as a systematic problem. On the contrary, from the beginning, it can be considered incorporated, not as a problem that could be solved through a more consistent argument, but as the foundation of its philosophy, be it of identity or freedom. This can be perceived in the light of the idea of the Absolute as a means where, scientifically, in the real part, all constructions are realized and, in the ideal part, where its essence presented as will of extrapolation from the ground to which all finite things are submitted through their form of being.
Downloads
References
Breazeale, D. (2014). “Exhibiting the particular in the universal”: philosophical construction and intuition in Schelling’s Philosophy of Identity (1801–1804) (pp. 91-119). In: Ostaric, L. (Org.). Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coelho, H. (2018). O monismo complexificado de Schelling. Cadernos De Filosofia Alemã: Crítica e Modernidade, 23 (1), 13-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v23i1p13-26
Danz, C. (2017). “Endlich die Philosophie ist unter diesen Wissenschaften die symbolische.” Anmerkungen zu Schellings Würzburger Symbolbegriff (pp. 55-77). In: Danz, C. (Org.). Schelling in Würzburg. Schellingiana 27. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog.
Gabriel, M. (2006). Das Absolute und die Welt in Schellings Freiheitsschrift, Bonn: Bonn University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1986) Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2003). Diferença entre os sistemas filosóficos de Fichte e Schelling. Tradução Carlos Morujão. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.
Jaeschke, W.; Arndt, A. (2012). Die Klassische Deutsche Philosophie nach Kant: Systeme der reinen Vernunft und ihre Kritik 1785-1845. München: CH Beck.
Jürgensen, S. (2000). Schellings logisches Prinzip: Der Unterschied in der Identität (pp. 113-43). In: Asmuth, C.; Denker, A.; Vater, M. (Orgs.). Schelling. Zwischen Fichte und Hegel. Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 32. Amsterdam: Grüner.
Morujão, C. (2004). Schelling e o Problema da Individuação (1792-1809). Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1997). Sämmtliche Werke. CD-ROM: Total Verlag.
Schiller, F. (1948). Schiller an Schelling (47) (pp. 596-97). In: Borcherdt, H (Org.). Schiller und die Romantiker: Briefe und Dokumente. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung Nachfolger.
Ziche, P. (2004). “Die Seele weiß nicht, sondern sie ist die Wissenschaft”. Zum Zusammenhang von Wissenschafts- und Personbegriffen bei Schelling (pp. 199-214). In: Buchheim, T.; Hermanni, F. (Orgs.). »Alle Persönlichkeit ruht auf einem dunkeln Grunde«. Schellings Philosophie der Personalität. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Ziche, P. (2011). Das System als Medium. Mediales Aufweisen und deduktives Ableiten bei Schelling (pp. 147-68). In: Danz, C.; Stolzenberg, J. (Orgs). System und Systemkritik um 1800: System der Vernunft. Kant und der deutsche Idealismus. Band III. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Luiz Filipe da Silva Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
