Univocity vs. Duality in Spinoza: Story of a misunderstanding

Authors

  • Antonieta Garcia Ruzo Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2020.166653

Keywords:

Spinoza, Dualism, Univocity, Infinite, Finite, Ontology, Gnoseology

Abstract

The following paper addresses the problem of dualism in Spinoza’s
ontology. It aims to briefly reconstruct the story of the discussion around this problem in orderto analyze howthe philosophical tradition
has interpreted the dualities of essence-existence, eternity-duration,
infinite-finite, substance-modes. The goal is to shed light on the inaccuracies
that arise from understanding these as ontological distinctions
as well as from ignoring them entirely. Our proposal is to expose an
interpretation that allows us to claim Spinoza’s duality, in a way that
presents it as a gnoseological duality instead of an ontological one, that
is, to show how the duplicity refers to perspectives or ways in which
humans conceive reality. We believe that, in this way, duality does not
only become compatible with the univocity of being but also provides a
deeper comprehension of the authentic Spinozistic spirit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bayle, P. (2010). diccionario histórico y crítico. buenos aires: el cuenco de plata.

Borges, J. I. (1969). “spinoza”,in:el otro el mismo. buenos aires: ediciones neperus.

Chaui, M. (2008). “o fim da metafísica: espinosa e a ontologia do necessário”, in: tatián, d., spinoza: cuarto coloquio. córdoba: ed. brujas.

Deleuze, G. (1996). spinoza y el problema de la expresión. trad. horst vogel. barcelona: muchnick editores.

Garrett, D. (2009). “spinoza on the essence of the human body and the part of the mind that is eternal”, in: koistinen, o., cambridge companion to spinoza’s ethics. cambrigde: cambridge university press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1955). lecciones sobre la historia de la Filo soFía,in: gaos, j., colección de textos clásicos: grandes obras, tomo i. méxico-buenos aires: fondo de cultura económica.

Jarrett, C. (2001). “spinoza´s distinction between essence and existence”, in:iyyun: the Jerusalem philosophical quarterly 50, universidad de jerusalén, julio 2001, pp. 245-252.

Klein, J. (2002). “by eternity i understand: eternity according to spinoza”, in: olyyun. the Jerusalem philosophical quarterly 51, universidad de jerusalén, julio 2002, pp. 295-324.

Laerke, M. (2017). “aspects of spinoza’s theory of essence. formal essence, non-existence, and two forms of actuality”, in: m. sinclair (ed.), the actual and the possible. oxford: oxford university press.

Lennon, T. (2005). “the rationalist conception of substance”, in: nelson, a.a companion to rationalism. united kingdom: blackwell publishing.

Macherey, P. (2006). hegel o spinoza. buenos aires: tinta limón.

Martin, C. P. (2008). “the framework of essences in spinoza’s ethics”,in:british Journal For the history oF philosophy, 16:3, pp. 489-509.

Morfino, V. (2015). “esencia y relación”, in: revista pensamiento político, n. 6, abril, chile, universidad diego portales.

Schmaltz, T. (2015).“spinoza on eternity and duration: the 1663 connection”, in: melamed, y (ed.), the young spinoza. a metaphysician in the making. oxford: oxford university press.

Spinoza, B. (1988). tratado de la reForma del entendimiento/principios de FilosoFía de descartes, pensamientos metaFísicos. trad.

Atilano Domínguez. madrid: editorial alianza.

Spinoza, B. (2006). tratado de la reForma del entendimiento. trad. oscar cohan. buenos aires: cactus.

Spinoza, B. (2007). epistolario. trad. oscar cohan. buenos aires: ed. colihue.

Spinoza, B. (2016). ética demostrada según el orden geométrico. trad. vidal peña. madrid: ed. alianza.

Viljanen, V. (2011). spinoza’s geometry oF power. new york: cambridge university press.

Zambrano, M. (1936). “la salvación del individuo en spinoza”, in: cuadernos de la Facultad de FilosoFía y letras n. 3, febrero-marzo, madrid, universidad complutense.

Published

2020-12-29

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Ruzo, A. G. (2020). Univocity vs. Duality in Spinoza: Story of a misunderstanding. Cadernos Espinosanos, 43, 81-129. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2020.166653