The Ricardian equivalence under collateral constraints

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575341jjj

Keywords:

Ricardian Equivalence, Collateral constraints, Debt neutrality

Abstract

This paper investigates the Ricardian Equivalence (RE) under collateralized debt, default, transaction costs and incomplete markets. The public debt is neutral and the RE holds only if the collateral-transfer cost depends linearly on the lump-sum tax and is fully offset. Lenders and borrowers should enter in a voluntary agreement to compensate for any transfer cost under default. However, any perturbation in the assumed affine relation undermines the debt neutrality. It is not the transaction cost per se that invalidates the RE, but rather how this cost affects the households’ indebtedness and budget constraint. The underlying mechanism is the credit channel of the fiscal policy. Whenever the transfer cost is not fully offset, there is a net tax balance leftover that affects the budget set and real allocations. This is fundamentally different from a liquidity constrained economy because the credit channel of the fiscal policy is binding and uncompensated transaction costs lead to the RE failure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • José Angelo Divino, Universidade Católica de Brasília

    Graduate Program of Economics

  • Jolivê Santana Filho, Instituto Federal de Goiás

    Professor

  • Jaime Orrillo, Universidade Católica de Brasília

    Graduate Program of Economics

References

Abel, A.B. 1986. The Failure of Ricardian Equivalence under Progressive Wealth Taxation, Journal of Public Economics 30(1): 117-128.

Araújo, A., Pascoa, M. R and Torres-Martinez, J.P. 2004. Collateral Avoids Ponzi Schemes in Incomplete Markets. Econometrica: 70(4): 1613-1638.

Arellano, Cristina. 2008. Default Risk and Income Fluctuations in Emerging Economies.

American Economic Review 98(3): 690-712.

Barro, R.J. 1974. Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095-117.

Barro, R. J. 1976. Perceived Wealth in Bonds and Social Security and the Ricardian Equiv- alence Theorem: Reply to Feldstein and Buchanan. Journal of Political Economy 84: 343-350.

Barro, R.J., 2023. r Minus g. Review of Economic Dynamics 48: 1-17.

Bassetto, M., Kocherlakota, N., 2004. On the irrelevance of government debt when taxes are distortionary. Journal of Monetary Economics 51, 299-304.

Brunnermeier, M. K., Eisenbach, T. M. and Sannikov, Y. (2012) Macroeconomics with financial frictions: A survey. In: Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Tenth World Congress of the Econometric Society, v. 2, pp. 4-94, Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan , J. M. 1976. Barro on the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 84: 337-342.

Carmichael, J. 1982. On Barro’s Theorem of Debt Neutrality: The Irrelevance of Net Wealth.

American Economic Review 72: 202-213.

Divino, J. A. and Orrillo, J. 2017. Failure of the Ricardian Equivalence Theory in Economies with Incomplete

Markets. Brazilian Review of Econometrics 37(1): 19-30.

Divino, J. A. and Orrillo, J. 2022. Robust Effects of a Debt-Financed Tax Cut in an Economy with Incomplete

Markets. International Tax and Public Finance 29: 191-200.

Evans, G.W., Honkapohja, S. and Mitra, K. 2012. Does Ricardian Equivalence Hold When Expectations are not Rational? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44(7): 1259-1283.

Feldstein, M., 1974. Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumula- tion. Journal of Political Economy 82: 905-26.

Ganakoplos, J. and Zame, W. 2014. Collateral Equilibrium: I: A Basic Framework. Economic Theory 56(3): 443-492.

Guerrieri, L. and Iacoviello, M. (2017) Collateral Constraints and Macroeconomic Asymme- tries. Journal of Monetary Economics, 90: 28-49.

Gorton, G. and Ordonez, G. (2014) Collateral Crises. American Economic Review 104(2): 343-378.

Hayford, M. 1989. Liquidity Constraints and the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem: Note. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 21: 380-387.

Kitlikoff, L. J, Razin, A. and Rosenthal, R.W. (1990) A Strategic Altruism Model in which Ricardian Equivalence does not hold. The Economic Journal 100: 1261-1268.

Kiyotaki, N. and Moore, J. (1997) Credit Cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105(2): 211- 248.

Mendoza, E. G. (2010) Sudden Stops, Financial Crises, and Leverage. American Economic Review 100: 1941-1966

Panadés, J. 2001. Tax evasion and Ricardian equivalence. European Journal of Political Economy 17: 799-815.

Pouzo, D. and Presno, I. 2022. Optimal Taxation with Endogenous Default under Incomplete Markets. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 14(3): 1-41.

Ricciuti, R. 2003. Assessing Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Economic Surveys 17: 55-78. Seater, J., 1985. Does Government Debt matter? A review. Journal of Monetary Economics

: 121-131.

Seater, J., 1993. Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature 31: 142-190. Simsek, A. (2013) Belief Disagreements and Collateral Constraints. Econometrica 81(1):1-53.

Strawczynski, M., 1995. Income Uncertainty and Ricardian Equivalence. American Economic Review 85(4), 964-967.

Downloads

Published

19-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data

How to Cite

Divino, J. A., Santana Filho, J. ., & Orrillo, J. (2023). The Ricardian equivalence under collateral constraints. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 53(4), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575341jjj