Freud e a fisiologia

Authors

  • Erasmo Garcia Mendes Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Biociências

Abstract

Freud's experience in the field of empirical science, at the beginning of his carrer in Vienna, is reviewed and admitted as still relevant in the years in which psychoanalysis was developped. Freud was successively zoologist (with Claus), physiologist (with Brücke) and psychologist (with Meynert) before creating his talk therapy. This would have enabled him to forecast that the advances in neurosciences and drug therapy might conflict with psychoanalysis. The compatibility between neurosciences and psychoanalysis, as defended by Mezan, is emphasized, in terms of each having its own purpose. Exemples of efforts to explain mechanistically the mind are evoked, as well as the recent revival of the concept of cognitive unconscious. Freud's position in relation to philosophy is briefly approached, as well as his view towards positivism. His frustrations - the lost chances of conceiving the neurone and prescribing cocain - are remembered. In spite of the theorization implicated in psychoanalysis, Freud remained residually a natural scientist, as he once proclaimed himself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

1996-08-01

Issue

Section

Texts

How to Cite

Mendes, E. G. (1996). Freud e a fisiologia . Estudos Avançados, 10(27), 79-93. https://journals.usp.br/eav/article/view/8936