The Calling: John Locke's motalirty of labour

Authors

  • Gerson Tadeu Astolfi Vivan Filho Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v1i34p38-54

Keywords:

John Locke, Labour, Religion, Private appropriation

Abstract

This articles aims to defy traditional interpretations about the role of the ideia of labour in Lockean arguments for private apropriation by exploring the religious and moral foundations of the notion in side texts. It concludes that labour is not limited to physical effort, neither to production of market exchange value, but refers to a robust and demanding ideal of human flowering, both material and intelectual, which brings about to ambiguous implications to the central argument and challenges its ability to justify specific property arrangements.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASHCRAFT, Richard. Locke’s Two Treatises of Government. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.

ARENDT, Hannah. A Condição Humana (1958). trad. Roberto Raposo. 10. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2008.

BUCKLE, Stephen. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

COLEMAN, Janet. “Pre-Modern Property and Self-Ownership Before and After Locke, or When did Common Decency Become a Private rather than a Public Virtue?”.In: European Journal of Political Theory. vol. 4, n. 2, 2005, p. 125-145, disponível em https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1474885105050446, acesso em 06.06.2018.

DAY, J. P. “Locke on Property”. Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, 1966, p. 207-220.

DUNN, John. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

LOCKE, John. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding (1690). Ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

LOCKE, John. Two Treatises on Government: In the Former, The False Principles and Fondation of Sir Robert Filmer, and His Followers, are Detected and Overthrown. The Latter is an Essay concerning The True Original, Extent, and End of Civil-Government. (1690-1704). Ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1959) 1988.

LOCKE, John. Ensaios sobre a Lei de Natureza (1663-1664), trad. Luiza de Souza Müller (Dissertação de Mestrado em Filosofia) – Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, 2005.

LOCKE, John. A Letter concerning Toleration and Other Writings, edited and with an Introduction by Mark Goldie. Indianapolis: LibertyFund, 2010. Disponível em <https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2375>.

LOCKE, John. “Of Conduct of Understanding” (1697). In: Some Thoughts Concerning Education. Ed. John William Adamson. Nova York: Dover, 2007.

LOCKE, John. “Study” [MS Locke f 2, março 1677], In: KING, Peter. The life of John Locke: with extracts from his correspondence, journals, and common-place books. Londres: Henry Colburn, 1829, p. 171-200.

LOCKE, John. “Understanding” [1677, MS Locke f 2], In: Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambdrige University Press, 1997, p. 260-264.

LOCKE, John. “For a General Naturalization” [1693, Houghton, MS Eng. 818, p. 1-5], In: Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: CambdrigeUniversity Press, 1997, p. 322-326.

LOCKE, John. “Trade” [1674, MS Locke, c. 30, fo 18], n: PoliticalEssays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: CambdrigeUniversity Press, 1997, p. 221-222.

LOCKE, John. “An Essay on the Poor Law” [1697, PRO co/388/5/86-95, fos. 232-49], n: Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambdrige University Press, 1997, p. 182-198.

LOCKE, John. “Carta para Denis Greenville” [c.9/19 - 11-21, Março 1677, n. 328], In: Selected Correspondence. Ed. Mark Goldie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 59-61.

LOCKE, John. “Labour” [1693, MS Film. 77, p. 310-11], In: Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambdrige University Press, 1997, p. 326-8.

LOCKE, John. “Homo ante et post lapsum” [1693, MS Locke c 28, fo. 113] In: Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambdrige University Press, 1997, p. 320-32.

MACPHERSON, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

MILLS, Charles. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.

PATEMAN, Carole. “Self-ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy. Vol. 10, n. 1, 2002, p. 20-53.

SIMMONS, A. John. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.

SREENIVASAN, Gopal. The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

TULLY, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19780.

WALDRON, Jeremy. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

YOLTON, John. Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding: a selective commentary on the “Essay”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Published

2019-06-25

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

The Calling: John Locke’s motalirty of labour. (2019). Cadernos De Ética E Filosofia Política, 1(34), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v1i34p38-54