Milk consumption habits on dairy for farmers of family farming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2019.155455Keywords:
Consumer behavior, Dairy, Raw milk, QuestionnaireAbstract
Brazil is one of the largest milk producers in the world and most establishments are small producers of family farming. Milk is a perishable product and due to its nutritional characteristics provides a favorable environment for the growth of bacteria. The objective of this research was to evaluate the consumption habits of milk in family farms, identifying the consumption forms, evaluating the risks and the perception of risk by the producers, besides evaluating the sanitary management adopted in the properties with respect to the diseases transmitted by the milk and milk products. One hundred eleven producers from the city of Realeza-PR were interviewed. Almost half (48.64%, 54/111) had a small production with up to 10 lactating animals. Most of the producers had animals with a low productivity, and the average milk production per animal was less than 10 liters. The milk produced was consumed internally by 93.67% (104/111) of those interviewed, and 7.2% (8/111) claim to ingest raw milk without any previous heat treatment. Some producers
(18%, 20/111) still made dairy products, like cheese and dulce de leche. Although 82.87% (92/111) reported having knowledge about the transmission of diseases through milk, only 49.54% (55/111) named the diseases. Not all producers conducted tests in the herd for disease control. The present study also found that only 4 people interviewed (3.6%, 4/111) associated the consumption of raw milk with some illness and reported having some symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, skin allergy, colic and gas. Thus, it is necessary to inform and guide producers about the risks associated with raw milk consumption, so that not only the health of the producer is assured, but also the family and the population that may acquire this product informally.
Downloads
References
Brasil. Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura e do Abastecimento. Leite: análise da conjuntura agropecuária [Internet]. Brasília: SEAB; 2016 [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.agricultura.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/deral/Prognosticos/2016/bovinouura_de_leite_2016.pdf
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Decreto n. 9.013, de 29 de março de 2017. Regulamento de inspeção industrial e sanitária de produtos de origem animal. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília (2017 mar. 30).
Cerda J, Vera C, Rada G. Odds ratio: aspectos teóricos y prácticos. Rev Med Chil. 2013;141(10):1329-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S003498872013001000014. PMid:24522363.
Conti F. Biometria: qui quadrado [Internet]. Belém: Laboratório de Infromática, UFPA; 2009 [cited 2018 Sept 14]. Available from: http://www.ufpa.br/dicas/biome/biopdf/bioqui.pdf
Delgado AF, Cardoso AL, Zamberlan P. Nutrologia básica e avançada. 1. ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2010.Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – EMBRAPA. Boas práticas de ordenha [Internet]. São Carlos: EMBRAPA; 2008 [cited 2018 Feb 8]. Available from: https://central3.to.gov.br/arquivo/228631/
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Censo agropecuário: agricultura familiar. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2006.International Dairy Federation – IDF. The significance of pathogenic microorganisms in raw milk. Brussels: International Dairy Federation; 1994. 215 p.
Menezes MFC, Simioni CP, Etchepare MA, Huer-Ta K, Bortoluzzi DP, Menezes CR. Microbiota e conservação do leite. REGET [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Feb 15];18:76-89. Available from: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/ viewFile/13033/pdf
Nero LA, Maziero D, Bezerra MMS. Hábitos alimentares do consumidor de leite cru de Campo Mourão – PR. Semin Ciênc Agrár. 2003;24(1):21-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2003v24n1p21.
Pereira D Fo, Furlan SA. Prevalência de intolerância à lactose em função da faixa etária e do sexo: experiência do laboratório Dona Francisca, Joinville (SC). Rev Salud Ambient. 2004;5(1):24-30.
Salvador FC, Burin AS, Frias AA, Oliveira FS, Faila N. Avaliação da qualidade microbiológica do leite pasteurizado comercializado em Apucarana-PR e região. Rev F@pciência [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 14];9(5):30-41. Available from: http://www.fap.com.br/fapciencia/009/edicao_2012/005.pdf
Sampedro GD, Silva MR, Faria LS, Souza GN. Fatores associados ao consumo informal de leite em pacientes com tuberculose na cidade de Juiz de Fora. In: Anais Eletrônicos do 15º Workshop de Iniciação Científica da EMBRAPA Gado de Leite [Internet]; 2015; Juiz de Fora, MG. Juiz de Fora: EMBRAPA; 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 19]. Available from: http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/142126/1/Cnpgl-2015- RAnais-15Pibic-Fatores-leite.pdf
Santos MV. Mastite ambiental: efeitos no animal e no leite [Internet]. Inforleite (São Paulo). 2012 out; 48-50. [cited 2018 Feb 8]. Available from: http://qualileite.org/pdf/Artigos-tecnicos-publicados-em-revista-de-divulgacao/Inforleite/2012/3.pdf
Soares KM. P., Gois VA, Aroucha EMM, Verissimo AMOT, Silva JBA. Hábitos de consumo de leite em três municípios do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Rev Verde. 2010;5(3):160-4.Vasconcellos SA, Ito FH. Principais zoonoses transmitidas pelo leite. Rev mv&z. 2011;9(1):32-7.
Vidal-Martins AMC, Bürger KP, Gonçalves ACS, Grisólio APR, Aguilar CEG, Rossi GAM. Avaliação do consumo de leite e produtos lácteos informais e do conhecimento da população sobre os seus agravos á saúde pública, em um município do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Bol Ind Anim. 2013;70(3):221-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.17523/bia.v70n3p221.
Zoccal R. Dez países top no leite [Internet]. Revista Balde Branco (Juiz de Fora). 2017 abr. 17 [cited 2018 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.baldebranco.com.br/dez-paises-top-no-leite/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The journal content is authorized under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license (summary of the license: https://