Cross-cultural adaptation of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) for Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20150014Keywords:
Stroke, Validity of Tests, Reproducibility of ResultsAbstract
Objective: To make a cross-cultural adaptation of the MAS for Brazil. Method: The process of cross-cultural adaptation took place in five stages: 1) translation of the original version of the MAS by two independent bilingual translators; 2) synthesis of translations (creation of version 1); 3) back-translation (version 1 in Portuguese was reversed to English by two independent bilingual translators); 4) analysis by the specialists committee (four translators and two physiotherapists); 5) pre-test (application of the instrument in the target population). A Delphi study was also performed and the instrument was submitted to the approval of ten physiotherapists from different states in the country. Results: The consensus about the clarity, semantic equivalence, and technicalscientific relevance of MAS-Brazil was obtained in the second phase of the Delphi study, with agreement between 80 and 100%. In the first phase of the Delphi study, suggestions were made to improve the clarity of the items, which resulted in the Delphi-2 list. Conclusion: The MAS-Brazil was created through an appropriate process of cross-cultural adaptation, ensuring its semantic equivalence and cultural adequacy. It is still necessary to verify the measuring properties of this version for its appropriate use clinically and in research.
Downloads
References
Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
Viana FP, Lorenzo AC, Oliveira EF, Resende AM.Medida de independência funcional nas atividades de vida diária em idosos com seqüelas de acidente vascular encefálico no Complexo Gerontológico Sagrada Família de Goiânia. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2008;11(1):17-28.
Falcao IV, Carvalho EMF, Barreto KML, Lessa FJD, Leite VMM. Acidente vascular cerebral precoce: implicaçoes para adultos em idade produtiva atendidos pelo Sistema Unico de Saúde. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2004;4(1):95-102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292004000100009
Rodgers H, Greenaway J, Davies T, Wood R, Steen N, Thomson R. Risk factors for first-ever stroke in older people in the north East of England: a population-based study. Stroke. 2004;35(1):7-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000106914.60740.78
Chong JY, Sacco RL. Epidemiology of stroke in young adults: race/ethnic differences. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005;20(2):77-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-005-3201-9
Marini C, Russo T, Felzani G. Incidence of stroke in young adults: a review. Stroke Res Treat. 2010;2011:535672.
Ceccato RB, Almeida CI. O planejamento da reabilitaçao na fase aguda após o acidente vascular encefálico. Acta Fisiatr. 2010;17(1):33-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v17i1a103309
Sampaio RF, Mancini MC. Estudos de revisao sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007; 11(1):83-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013
Soriano FFS, Baraldi K. Escalas de avaliaçao funcional aplicáveis a pacientes pós acidente vascular encefálico. ConScientiae Saúde, 2010;9(3):521-30.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Maki T, Quagliato EMAB, Cacho EWA, Paz LPS, Nascimento NH, Inoue MMEA, et al. Estudo de confiabilidade da aplicaçao da escala de Fugl-Meyer no Brasil. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2006;10(2):177-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552006000200007
Pavan K, Cruz LC, Nunes MF, Menezes LG, Marangoni BE. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients within the brazilian cultural and language context. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(1):52-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2010000100012
Conte AL, Ferrari PP, Carvalho TB, Relvas PCA, Neves RCM, Rosa SF. Confiabilidade, compreensao e aceitaçao da versao em português da Motor Assessment Scale em pacientes com acidente vascular encefálico. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(5):405-411. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000056
Ferreiro KN, Santos RL, Conforto AB. Psychometric properties of the portuguese version of the Jebsen-Taylor test for adults with mild hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(5):377-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010005000018
Saliba VA, Magalhaes LV, Faria CDCM, Laurentino GEC, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Adaptaçao Transcultural e análise das propriedades psicométricas da versao brasileira do instrumento Motor Activity Log. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011;30(3):262-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892011000900011
Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF, Mariano DC, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000177918
Michaelsen SM, Natalio MA, Silva AG, Pagnussat AS. Confiabilidade da traduçao e adaptaçao do Test d'Évaluation des Membres Supérieurs de Personnes Agées (TEMPA) para o português e validaçao para adultos com hemiparesia. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008; 12(6):511-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552008005000012
Castelassi CS, Ribeiro EAF, Fonseca VC, Beinotti F, Oberg TD, Lima NMFV. Confiabilidade da versao brasileira da escala de deficiências de tronco em hemiparéticos. Fisioter Mov. 2009;22(2):189-99.
Pereira ND, Michaelsen SM, Menezes IS, Ovando AC, Lima RC, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Reliability of the brazilian version of the Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(3):257-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000300013
Yoneyama SM, Roiz RM, Oliveira TM, Oberg TD, Lima NMFV. Validaçao da versao brasileira da Escala de Avaliaçao Postural para Pacientes após Acidente Vascular Encefálico. Acta Fisiátr. 2008;15(2):96-100.
Lima NMFV, Rodrigues SY, Fillipo TM, Oliveira R, Oberg TG, Cacho EWA. Versao brasileira da Escala de Comprometimento do tronco: um estudo de validade em sujeitos pós-acidente vascular encefálico. Fisioter Pesq. 2008;16(3):248-253.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-80.
Tuak C, Scott J, Kirkman A, Singer B. Relationship between initial Motor Assessment Scale scores and length of stay, mobility at discharge and discharge destination after stroke. NZ J Physioter.2010;38(1):7-13.
O'Connell C, Galvin R, Varghese AC, Lamson J, Stokes E. Analysis of the inter-rater reliability of the Motor Assessment Scale and the Fugl-Meyer Scale. Dublin: Trinity College, Faculty of Health Sciences; 2002.
Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69(3 Pt 1):195-7.
Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(11):1206-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90006-X
Aamodt G, Kjendahl A, Jahnsen R. Dimensionality and scalability of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(16):1007-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280500476188
Miller KJ, Slade AL, Pallant JF, Galea MP. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the upper limb subscales of the Motor Assessment Scale using a Rasch analysis model. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(4):315-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0519
Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(6):617-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr530oa
English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Warden-Flood A. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(1):52-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr877oa
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Can physiotherapy after stroke based on the Bobath concept result in improved quality of movement compared to the motor relearning programme. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(2):69-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.474
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
Maher CG, Latimer J, Costa LOPA. importância da adaptaçao transcultural e clinimétrica para instrumentos de fisioterapia. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(4):245-52.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008-15.
Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-exame do estado mental: característicaspsicométricas em idosos ambulatoriais. Rev Saude Pub. 2006;40(4):712-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000500023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
