Analysis of postural control after the application of functional electrical stimulation in stroke patients

Authors

  • Thais Delamuta Ayres da Costa IB-UNESP/Rio Claro
  • Alessandra Ferreira Barbosa Hospital do Coração - Hcor
  • Maria Fernanda Pauletti Oliveira Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Pedro Cláudio Gonsales de Castro Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Denise Vianna Machado Ayres Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Maria Cecília dos Santos Moreira Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • José Augusto Fernandes Lopes Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Daniel Gustavo Goroso Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20130009

Keywords:

Stroke, Postural Balance, Electric Stimulation Therapy

Abstract

Strokes cause the main neurological impairments in adults around the world. They can result in neuromotor and cognitive deficits. Among the neuromotor deficits there is spasticity; this affects the planning of movements and posture control. The postural control system is essential for functional independence in daily life activities and is, therefore, one of the main goals to achieve in rehabilitation programs. These programs have various therapeutic elements aimed at providing stimulus to the individual, which help them control their movements and stance more efficiently. Among these techniques is neuromuscular electrical stimulation, which contributes to decreasing spasticity and other benefits. When used for functional tasks it is called Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). Objective: The purpose of this study was to verify the response of the postural control in two individuals with hemiparesis by stroke after the application of the FES over a short period time. Method: The experimental protocol had four phases. A: pre-FES; B: Immediately after the application of FES; C: 45 minutes after the application of FES; D: 90 minutes after application of FES. In each phase, the participants were positioned on a force platform and made three attempts to do the chosen task: touching the fingertip-to-floor test. Results: The software Matlab 7.0 provided the variable center-of-pressure velocities along the mediolateral (Vmx) and anteroposterior (Vmy) axes. In this way it was possible to see that, even when the participants showed a reduction in Vmx and Vmy, it was by less than 1%. Conclusion: This may indicate postural regulatory activity similar to before the application of FES, and even less postural regulatory activity when the centerof- pressure velocities were greater at the start, even 90 minutes after the application of FES.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, Ermani M, Pizzolato G, Iaia V, et al. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke. 1993;24(8):1186-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1186

Ward AB. Long-term modification of spasticity. J Rehabil Med. 2003;(41 Suppl):60-5.

Muren MA, Hütler M, Hooper J. Functional capacity and health-related quality of life in individuals post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(1):51-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1501-51

Benaim C, Pérennou DA, Villy J, Rousseaux M, Pelissier JY. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke. 1999;30(9):1862-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1862

Mauritz KH. Gait training in hemiparetic stroke patients. Eura Medicophys. 2004;40(3):165-78.

Robinson AJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Eletrofisiologia clínica - eletroterapia e teste eletrofisiológico. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2001.

Alfieri V. Electrical treatment of spasticity. Reflex tonic activity in hemiplegic patients and selected specific electrostimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982;14(4):177-82.

Greve JMD. Tratado de medicina de reabilitaçao. Sao Paulo: Roca; 2007.

Kendall FP, Mccreary EK, Provance PG. Músculos, provas e funçoes. Sao Paulo: Manole; 1995.

Perret C, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Colau MM, Benhamou MA, Revel M. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1566-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26064

Cornilleau-Pérès V, Shabana N, Droulez J, Goh JC, Lee GS, Chew PT. Measurement of the visual contribution to postural steadiness from the COP movement: methodology and reliability. Gait Posture. 2005;22(2):96-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.07.009

Raymakers JA, Samson MM, Verhaar HJ. The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter(s). Gait Posture. 2005;21(1):48-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.11.006

Mesci N, Ozdemir F, Kabayel DD, Tokuc B. The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on clinical improvement in hemiplegic lower extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke: a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(24):2047-54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638280902893626

Cheng JS, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Lin PY, Wang RY. Effects of combining electric stimulation with active ankle dorsiflexion while standing on a rocker board: a pilot study for subjects with spastic foot after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(4):505-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.022

Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li LS. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36(1):80-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000149623.24906.63

Published

2013-03-03

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

1.
Costa TDA da, Barbosa AF, Oliveira MFP, Castro PCG de, Ayres DVM, Moreira MC dos S, et al. Analysis of postural control after the application of functional electrical stimulation in stroke patients. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 3 [cited 2024 Jun. 19];20(1):50-4. Available from: https://journals.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/103754