O Estado de bem-estar em Hayek e Luhman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702013000200006Resumo
A teoria de sistemas sociais tem sido alvo de críticas que veem em suas premissas um conteúdo político considerado neoliberal: partindo de uma visão estereotipada do conceito de autopoiese, segundo a qual a economia funcionalmente diferenciada não pode ser determinada pela política, inferem uma preferência pelo livre mercado. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar um confronto entre as visões de Hayek e Luhmann, tendo como fio condutor as respectivas considerações sobre o Estado de bem-estar. Enquanto a crítica neoliberal se converte automaticamente em uma defesa moral do livre mercado, a teoria de sistemas permite (via acoplamentos estruturais) uma discussão mais acurada das relações entre política e economia e um diagnóstico consistente do welfare state.
Downloads
Referências
amadae, Sonja M. (2003), Rationalizing capitalist democracy: the cold war origins of rational choice liberalism. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Araújo, Cícero & Waizbort, Leopoldo. (1999), “Sistema e evolução na teoria de Luhmann (mais: Luhmann sobre o sistema mundial)”. Lua Nova, 47: 179-200.
Bachur, João Paulo. (2006), “Individualismo, liberalismo e filosofia da história”. Lua Nova, 66: 167-203.
. (2010), Às portas do labirinto: para uma recepção crítica da teoria social de Niklas Luhmann. Rio de Janeiro, Azougue.
Buchanan, James. ([1975] 1984), The limits of liberty: between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
. (1986), Liberty, market and state: political economy in the 1980s. Sussex, Wheatsheaf Books.
. (1988), The political economy of the welfare state. Estocolmo, Almqvist & Wicksell International.
. (1989), Essays on the political economy. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.
Erning, Bernhard. (1993), Hayeks Moralphilosophie: Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit in der Großen Gesellschaft. Tese de doutorado. Freiburg, Faculdade de Filosofia da Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
. (1996), Welfare states in transition: national adaptations in global economies. London, unrisd-Sage.
Friedman, Milton. ([1962] 1982), Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Gray, John. (1995), Freiheit im Denken Hayeks. Trad. Dieter Birnbacher. Tubinga, Mohr Siebeck.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1973), Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
. (1981), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2 vols.
. (1985), “Die Neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Die Krise des Wohlfahrtsstaates und die Erschöpfung utopischer Energien”. Merkur: Deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken, 29:1-14.
Hayek, Friedrich August von. (1960), The constitution of liberty. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
. (1969), Freiburger Studien. Tubinga, J. C. B. Mohr.
. (1973), Law, legislation and liberty [vol. 1]. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
. (1976), Law, legislation and liberty [vol. 2]. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
. (1979), Law, legislation and liberty [vol. 3]. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
. (1984), Individualism and economic order. Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
. ([1944] 1994), The road to serfdom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Hirschman, Albert. (1992), A retórica da intransigência: perversidade, futilidade, ameaça. Trad. Tomás Rosa Bueno. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1981), American politics: the promise of disharmony. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Jessop, Bob (1992), “The economy, the state and the law: theories of relative autonomy and autopoietic closure”. In: Teubner, Gunther & Febbrajo, Alberto (orgs.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: regulation and autonomy in a new perspective. Milão, Giuffrè.
Kuchler, Bárbara. (2006), “Bourdieu und Luhmann über den Wohlfahrtsstaat. Die Autonomie gesellschaftlicher Teilbereiche und die Asymmetrie der Gesellschaftstheorie”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 35: 5-23.
Krönig, Franz Kasper. (2007), Die Ökonomisierung der Gesellschaft. Bielefeld, Transcript.
Luhmann, Niklas. (1981), Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat, Munique, Günther Olzog.
. (1984), Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
. (1988), Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
. (1990), “Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft”. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, pp. 176-220.
. (1994), “Kapitalismus und Utopie”. Merkur, 3: 189-198.
. (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
. (2000), Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
. ([1975] 2005a), “Evolution und Geschichte”. In: . Soziologische Aufklärung [vol. 2]. Wiesbaden, Springer vs.
. ([1984] 2005b), “Der Wohlfahrtsstaat zwischen Evolution und Rationalität”. In: . Soziologische Aufklärung [vol. 4]. Wiesbaden, Springer vs.
. ([1994] 2005c), “Inklusion und Exklusion”. In: , Soziologische Aufklärung [vol. 6]. Wiesbaden, Springer vs.
Mayntz, Renate. (1988), “Funktionalle Teilsysteme in der Theorie sozialer Differenzierung”. In: et al. (orgs.). Differenzierung und Verselbständigung: zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme. Frankfurt/New York, Campus.
Murray, Charles. ([1984]1994), Loosing ground: american social policy, 1950-1980. New York, Basic Books.
Nozick, Robert. (1974), Anarchy, state and utopia. New York, Basic Books.
O’Connor, James. (1973), The fiscal crisis of the state. New York, St. Martin’s Press.
Offe, Claus ([1984] 1993), Contradictions of the Welfare State. 5ª ed. Cambridge (ma), mit Press.
. (2003), Herausforderung der Demokratie. Frankfurt, Campus.
Paulani, Leda Maria (1996). “Hayek e o individualismo no discurso econômico”. Lua Nova, 38: 97-124.
Pierson, Paul. (1994), Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam & Sprague, John. (1986), Paper Stones: a History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, Karl. (1944), The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston, Beacon Press.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. ([1981] 1992), La crise de l’état-providence. 2ª ed. Paris, Seuil.
Tullock, Gordon. (1983), Welfare for the well-to-do. Dallas, The Fisher Institute.
Wünsche, Horst Friedrich (org.), Grundtexte zur sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Stuttgart/New York, Jena/G. Fischer (vol. 1/1981; vol. 2/1988; vol. 3/1994).
Zeitler, Christoph. (1996), Spontane Ordnung, Freiheit und Recht: zur politischen Philosophie von Friedrich August von Hayek. 2ª ed. Frankfurt, Lang.
Zolo, Danilo. (1992), “The epistemological status of the theory of autopoiesis and its applications to the social sciences”. In: Teubner, Gunther & Febbrajo, Alberto (orgs.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: regulation and autonomy in a new perspective. Milão, Giuffrè.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
