Half a century of studying adaptability and stability in maize and soybean in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0197

Keywords:

Zea mays L., Glycine max (L.) Merril, genotype × environment interaction, adaptation, cultivar recommendation

Abstract

The study of adaptability and stability underlies the cultivar recommendation process for all crops. There is a considerable number of statistical methods available for this purpose, but little is known about their actual adoption by the Brazilian scientific community. The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the scientific literature on the adaptability and stability methods used in maize and soybean in Brazil from scientific articles published between 1970 and 2017 in Brazilian journals. Article searches were carried out in journals indexed through the SciELO database. The articles were classified according to the year of publication and the adaptability and stability methods used. We also evaluated the pattern of association between methods. We found 113 articles on adaptability and stability in maize and soybean, in which 21 methods were listed. The most commonly used method was the Eberhart and Russell methodology. The Cruz, Torres, and Vencovsky along with the AMMI methods were also widely used. The number of articles using most methods decreased in the current decade, except for the GGE Biplot, MHPRVG, and Centroid methods. In studies with more than one method, the methods were more likely to be used together with the Eberhart and Russell methodology. Adaptability and stability in maize and soybean have been widely studied over the last several decades in Brazil, although the number of publications on this subject has decreased over this time period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-06

Issue

Section

Biometry, Modeling and Statistics

How to Cite

Half a century of studying adaptability and stability in maize and soybean in Brazil. (2021). Scientia Agricola, 78(3), e20190197. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0197