Blockchain in education: the influence of trust on adoption and implementation

Authors

  • Universidade Paulista
  • Universidade Paulista

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2021-0097

Keywords:

Trust,Higher education, Adoption, Blockchain

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the influence of trust on adopting and implementing blockchain technology in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Brazil.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses an exploratory qualitative approach to understand the construct of trust in the context of the educational sector. Data were collected through semistructured questionnaires and online interviews.

Findings

The research identified that, for most potential blockchain users, trust positively influences the HEIs, because benefits such as secure data sharing and transaction transparency could optimize the daily routine and avoid fraud in academic documents, providing a cooperative and reliable working environment. In addition, the results suggest that trust is needed to overcome challenges related to issues such as costs and privacy.

Research limitations/implications

This study contributes to the advances in the emerging literature on blockchain in the educational sector as a system with the potential to generate trust, as well as the literature on the technology acceptance models.

Practical implications

For HEI managers and practitioners, this study highlights the need for a greater understanding of the influence of trust in the relationships between HEIs and other stakeholders.

Social implications

This work shows that adopting blockchain technologies would allow users to build social relationships of trust in a cooperative work environment and develop trusted behavior by sharing data securely and transparently.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies on the adoption and implementation of blockchain in the education sector in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahrendt, W., Pace, G. J., & Schneider, G. (2018). Smart contracts: A killer application for deductive source code verification. In P. Müller, & I. Schaefer (Eds.), Principled software development, Cham: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98047-8_1.

Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., & Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2400, doi: 10.3390/app9122400. MDPI AG.

Angelis, J., & Ribeiro da Silva, E. (2019). Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective. Business Horizons, 62(3), 307–314, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.12.001.

Brasil. (2019). Dispõe sobre a emissão e o registro de diploma de graduação, por meio digital, pelas instituições de ensino Superior – IES pertencentes ao sistema federal de ensino. Diário Oficial da União, ano 12/03/2019, n. 48, p. 23 e 24. Portaria MEC n. 554, de 11 de março de 2019. Retrieved from www.semesp.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PORTARIA-MEC-N%C2%BA-554-DE-11-DE-MAR%C3%87O-DE-2019.pdf

Corrêa, V. S., Carneiro-da-Cunha, J. A., Nassif, V. M. J., & Giglio, E. M. (2022). Relational influence on entrepreneurial orientation: An exploratory study of small religious enterprises in Brazil. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 1–22, doi: 10.1108/JEEE-09-2020-0353.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319, doi: 10.2307/249008.

de Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: the problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society, 62, 1–14, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research, Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from https://br.search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=E211BR826G0&p=Fishbein%2C+M.%2C+%26+Ajzen%2C+I.+(1975).+Belief%2C+attitude%2C+intention+and+behaviour%3A+an+introduction+to+theory+and+research.+Reading%2C+MA%3A+Addison-Wesley

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51, doi: 10.2307/30036519.

Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., Warkentin, M., & Pavlou, P. A. (2011). Cultural diversity and trust in IT adoption. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 54 –78, doi: 10.4018/jgim.2005010103.

Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217.

Gössling, T. (2004). Proximity, trust and morality in networks. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 675–689. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0965431042000220011 doi: 10.1080/0965431042000220011.

Grech, A., & Camilleri, A. F. (2017). Blockchain in education. In A. Inamorato dos Santos (Ed.), EUR 28778 EN; doi:10.2760/60649. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/60649

Han, M., Li, Z., He, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Baba, A. I. (2018). A novel blockchain-based education records verification solution. Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education, pp. 178–183, doi: 10.1145/3241815.3241870

Helliar, C. V., Crawford, L., Rocca, L., Teodori, C., & Veneziani, M. (2020). Permissionless and permissioned blockchain diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 54, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102136.

Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain

Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analyzing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 302–309, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012.

Jebb, A. T., Parrigon, S., & Woo, S. E. (2017). Exploratory data analysis as a foundation of inductive research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 265–276, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.003.

Jussani, A. C., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., Wright, J. T. C., & Grisi, C. C. D H. (2018). Marketing internationalization: Influence factors on product customization decision. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(4), 555–574, doi: 10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0043.

Liu, L., Han, M., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Understanding data breach: A visualization aspect. S. Chellappan, W. Cheng, & W. Li, (Eds). Wireless algorithms, systems, and applications. WASA 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 10874. Cham: Springer. In: 10.1007/978-3-319-94268-1_81

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://Bitcoin.Org/Bitcoin.Pdf

Niu, B., Dong, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 152, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102276.

Queiroz, M. M., & Fosso Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70–82, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021.

Queiroz, M. M., Pereira, S. C. F., Telles, R., & Machado, M. C. (2021). Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1761–1782. Retrieved from www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0435/full/html doi: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0435.

Ralph, A. F., Chadban, S. J., Butow, P., Craig, J. C., Kanellis, J., Wong, G., … Tong, A. (2020). The experiences and impact of being deemed ineligible for living kidney donation: Semi‐structured interview study. Nephrology, 25(4), 339–350, doi: 10.1111/nep.13628.

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, doi: 10.1177/1609406919862424.

Schiavi, G. S., Behr, A., & Marcolin, C. B. (2019). Conceptualizing and qualifying disruptive business models. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(3), 269–286, doi: 10.1108/RAUSP-09-2018-0075.

Schuetz, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2020). Blockchain, adoption, and financial inclusion in India: Research opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101936, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.009.

Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Brown, S. A., & Zhao, T. (2022). Understanding users' trust transfer mechanism in a blockchain-enabled platform: A mixed-methods study. Decision Support Systems, 155, 113716, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113716.

Stieglitz, S., Hofeditz, L., Brünker, F., Ehnis, C., Mirbabaie, M., & Ross, B. (2022). Design principles for conversational agents to support emergency management agencies. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102469, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102469.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). How blockchain will change organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2), 10–13. Retrieved from www.proquest.com/openview/8c8f32d30dfcdbe4bb4febf1952533ea/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=26142

Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Ben Dhaou, S. (2021). A framework of blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(3), doi: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103444.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478, doi: 10.2307/30036540.

Viriyasitavat, W., Da Xu, L., Bi, Z., & Sapsomboon, A. (2020). Blockchain-based business process management (BPM) framework for service composition in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, doi: 10.1007/s10845-018-1422-y.

Völter, F., Urbach, N., & Padget, J. (2021). Trusting the trust machine: Evaluating trust signals of blockchain applications. International Journal of Information Management, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102429.

Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2022). Industry 4.0 and the supply chain digitalisation: A blockchain diffusion perspective. Production Planning & Control, 33(2-3), 193–210, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1810756.

Wan, Y., Gao, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). Blockchain application and collaborative innovation in the manufacturing industry: Based on the perspective of social trust. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121540.

Wang, J., Wu, P., Wang, X., & Shou, W. (2017). The outlook of blockchain technology for construction engineering management. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(1), 67–75. Retrieved from https://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2017006 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2017006.

Wendland, J., Lunardi, G. L., & Dolci, D. B. (2019). Adoption of health information technology in the mobile emergency care service. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(3), 287–304, doi: 10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0058.

Wong, L. W., Tan, G. W. H., Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., & Sohal, A. (2020). Unearthing the determinants of blockchain adoption in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2100–2123, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1730463.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Estudo de caso – Planejamento e métodos, (5. ed., p. 320), Porto Alegre (Brazil: Bookman. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.br/books?id=EtOyBQAAQBAJ

Downloads

Published

2022-08-07

Issue

Vol. 57 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Research Paper

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.

The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.

Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution

Funding data