Political and financial background in board interlocking and earnings management in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-10-2020-0245Keywords:
Corporate governance, Accounting information quality, Board interlocking, Political background, Financial backgroundAbstract
Purpose – Although board interlocking underlying forces are largely hidden, the purpose of this paper is to provide managers, auditors, analysts, regulators and other stakeholders with sociological board interlocking information considering the different backgrounds of their members.
Design/methodology/approach – The research sample gathered 1,606 observations from 2010 to 2017. For data analysis, the direct and indirect board interlocking linkages, considering the different backgrounds of board members, established the centrality indicators. Subsequently, the authors used these indicators according to each measured background in the regression models.
Findings – The results indicate that the political background of board interlocking members is positively related to real earnings management practices, while the financial background has a mitigating effect on such practices. Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest that individual skills and interests conveyed across the corporate social network have shaped corporate governance, with distinct impacts on the quality of accounting information.
Practical implications – The authors conclude that both backgrounds could have implications on agency conflicts, increasing (policy) or reducing (financial) information asymmetry between the company and its various stakeholders, which indicates that the authors must consider sociological and not just economic aspects within corporate governance.
Social implications – The sociological background of individuals is necessary for the congruence of monitoring mechanisms, and consequently, the quality of accounting information. Originality/value – This study examines the influence of the political and financial background of board interlocking members on real earnings management practices in Brazilian publicly traded companies in the International Financial Reporting Standards post-adoption period.
Downloads
References
Achleitner, A. K., Günther, N., Kaserer, C., & Siciliano, G. (2014). Real earnings management and accrual-based earnings management in family firms. European Accounting Review, 23(3), 431–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.895620.
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485–556.
Ahn, S., & Choi, W. (2009). The role of bank monitoring in corporate governance: Evidence from borrowers’ earnings management behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 425–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.013.
Barros, C. M. E., & Colauto, R. D. (2019). A influência do board interlocking na qualidade da informação contabil em empresas brasileiras. Revista Universo Contabil, 15(1), 106–130.
Barroso-Castro, C., Villegas-Periñan, M. D. M., & Casillas-Bueno, J. C. (2016). How boards’ internal and external social Capital interact to affect firm performance. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 6–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015604799.
Batta, G., Sucre Heredia, R., & Weidenmier, M. (2014). Political connections and accounting quality under high expropriation risk. European Accounting Review, 23(4), 485–517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.906316.
Bazerman, M. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1983). A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 206–217.
Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13.
Bizjak, J., Lemmon, M., & Whitby, R. (2009). Option backdating and board interlocks. Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4821–4847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn120.
Bona-Sanchez, C., Pérez-Aleman, J., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2014). Politically connected firms and earnings informativeness in the controlling versus minority shareholder’s context: European evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 330–346.
Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity Capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 541–559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005.
Braam, G., Nandy, M., Weitzel, U., & Lodh, S. (2015). Accrual-based and real earnings management and political connections. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(2), 111–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2013.10.009.
Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate Elites1. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/428817.
Byrd, D. T., & Mizruchi, M. S. (2005). Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 129–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.09.002.
Camilo, S. P. O., Marcon, R., & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2012). Political connections of firms and their effects on performance: A convergence between the perspectives of governance and resource dependence – a theoretical essay. Revista Alcance, 19(2), 241–258.
Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2), 58–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003.
Chahine, S., & Goergen, M. (2014). Top management ties with board members: How they affect pay–performance sensitivity and IPO performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 99–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.007.
Chen, C. J., Ding, Y., & Kim, C. F. (2010). High-level politically connected firms, corruption, and accurate forecasting around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1505–1524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.27.
Chen, R., Dyball, M. C., & Wright, S. (2009). The link between board composition and corporate diversification in Australian corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 208–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00734.x.
Chiu, P. C., Teoh, S. H., & Tian, F. (2013). Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. The Accounting Review, 88(3), 915–944. doi:https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369.
Cohen, D. A., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 2–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.01.002.
Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409–1437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01574.x.
Connelly, B. L., & Van Slyke, E. J. (2012). The power and peril of board interlocks. Business Horizons, 55(5), 403–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006.
Cunha, P. R. D., & Piccoli, M. R. (2017). Influence of board interlocking on earnings management. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(74), 179–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201701980.
Davis, G. F., & Mizruchi, M. S. (1999). The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 215–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666995.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001.
Dhaliwal, D. A. N., Naiker, V. I. C., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of background on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x.
Dittmann, I., Maug, E., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of german firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfp007.
Doukakis, L. C. (2014). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on real and accrual-based earnings management activities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(6), 551–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.08.006.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
Elouaer-Mrizak, S., & Chastand, M. (2013). Detecting communities within french intercorporate network. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 82–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.058.
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704.
Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x.
Fan, J. P., Guan, F., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Relationship networks and earnings informativeness: Evidence from corruption cases. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(7-8), 831–866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12078.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/467037.
Fligstein, N., & Brantley, P. (1992). Bank control, owner control, or organizational dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation? American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 280–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/230009.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Ge, W., & Kim, J. B. (2014). Boards, takeover protection, and real earnings management. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 43(4), 651–682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0388-2.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002.
Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., & Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12032.
Gujarati, D. N. (2006). Basic econometrics. 4 ed. Rio De Janeiro, Elsevier.
Güner, A. B., Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Financial background of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 323–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.009.
Gunny, K. A. (2010). The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x.
Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7/8), 1034–1062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00594.x.
Harris, D. A., & Helfat, C. E. (2007). The board of directors as a social network: A new perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 228–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607305901.
Hashim, H. A., & Rahman, M. S. A. (2011). Multiple board appointments: Are directors effective? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17)
Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 564–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393337.
Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. (1998). When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 815–844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393617.
Hoitash, U. (2011). Should independent board members with social ties to management disqualify themselves from serving on the board? Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 399–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0660-5.
Ingley, C. B., & Van der Walt, N. T. (2001). The strategic board: The changing role of directors in developing and maintaining corporate capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00245.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1978). Can the corporation survive? Financial Analysts Journal, 34(1), 31–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v34.n1.31.
Kang, J. K., Liu, W. L., Low, A., & Zhang, L. (2018). Friendly boards and innovation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 45, 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.09.007.
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524.
Lee, J., Lee, K. J., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2014). Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 232–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.004.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
Mindzak, J. (2013). Interlocked boards of directors, voluntary disclosures and earnings quality. Voluntary Disclosures and Earnings Quality, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238871.
Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2007). Myopic marketing management: Evidence of the phenomenon and its long-term performance consequences in the SEO context. Marketing Science, 26(3), 361–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0261.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271.
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rent–seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00053.x.
Nguyen, B. D. (2012). Does the rolodex matter? Corporate elite’s small world and the effectiveness of boards of directors. Management Science, 58(2), 236–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1457.
Qian, M., Pan, H., & Yeung, B. (2011). Expropriation of minority shareholders in politically connected firms. Unpublished Working Paper. The National University of Singapore.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Politically-connected firms: Are they connected to earnings opacity? Research in Accounting Regulation, 17, 25–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17002-1.
Ribeiro, F., & Colauto, R. D. (2016). A relação entre board interlocking e as praticas de suavização de resultados. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 27(70), 55–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501320.
Ribeiro, F., Consoni, S., & Colauto, R. D. (2018). A influência do board interlocks na pratica da divulgação voluntaria em empresas brasileiras. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 15(37), 120–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2018v15n37p120.
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002.
Shi, L. Dharwadkar, R., & Harris, D. (2013). Board interlocks and earnings quality. Available at: SSRN. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x.
Shu, P. G., Yeh, Y. H., Chiu, S. B., & Yang, Y. W. (2015). Board external connectedness and earnings management. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(4), 265–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.003.
Stearns, L. B., & Mizruchi, M. S. (1993). Board composition and corporate financing: The impact of financial institution representation on borrowing. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 603–618.
Tomka, B. (2001). Interlocking directors of banks and industrial companies in Hungary at the beginning of the twentieth century. Business History, 43(1), 25–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713999208.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press.
Zang, A. Y. (2011). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management.The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196.
Zang, A. Y. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/
2308/accr-10196.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
