Social entrepreneurship and social change: a practice-based study in non-governmental organizations

Authors

  • Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2020-0091

Keywords:

Social entrepreneurship, Practice theory, Social change, Social practices, Ethnography

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to examine how social entrepreneurship (SE) practices give rise to social change in the context of urban Brazil.

Design/methodology/approach – The study draws on a broader inductive, ethnographic and iterative practice-based study conducted in three Brazilian non-governmental organizations.

Findings – Social change is established through intertwined practices that involve active interplay of ambivalent positive and negative feelings associated with the social mission pursued by the social enterprise; flat organizational structures that encourage participation and taking of ownership among all stakeholders; and focused organizational objectives (social purposes).

Research limitations/implications – The paper presents an analytical framework composed of five propositions that may be used in future research aimed at maturing and refining the understanding of SE. The study also provides a methodological contribution for future studies of new phenomenon and young fields of research that often must rely on inductive methodologies, by demonstrating how an iterative thematic analysis can be used in practice-based studies.

Practical implications – This paper has practical implications directly connected to its social implications, because understanding how social change is achieved may enhance the effectiveness of SE practitioners in bringing desired changes about. Furthermore, the discussion also provided insights for practitioners to reflect upon the paradoxical nature of practices aimed at social change.

Originality/value – The study suggests a set of propositions and an original definition of SE that mitigates conceptual inconsistencies found in literature drawing on empirical data and by incorporating the political lens found in practice theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdukadirov, S. (2010). Terrorism: The dark side of social entrepreneurship. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(7), 603-617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.484011.

Barberá-Tomás, D., Castelĺo, I., De Bakker, F. G. A., & Zietsma, C. (2019). Energizing through visuals: How social entrepreneurs use emotion-symbolic work for social change. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1789–1817. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1488.

Barinaga, E. (2013). Politicising social entrepreneurship – Three social entrepreneurial rationalities toward social change. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 347–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.823100.

Bloom, P. N. (2012). Introduction to special section on social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 73–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.31.1.73.

Calas, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing entrepreneurship as social change. Through Feminist Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.

Certo, S. T., & Miller, T. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons, 51(4), 267–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.02.009.

Cho, A. H. (2006). Politics, value and social entrepreneurship: A critical appraisal. In J. Mair, J. A. Robinson, & K. Hockerts, (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 34–56). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001.

Dahles, H., Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2010). The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship. Journal of

Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 4(1), 85–108.

Darabi, M., Soltani, H., Nasari, K., & Emami, M. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the

concept. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(6), 8.

Defourny, J. (2010). Concepts of social enterprise: A European perspective. In A. Fayolle, & H.

Matlay, (Eds), Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship (pp. 57–87). Glos: Edward

Elgar Publishing.

Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in

Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social

Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053.

Dey, P., & Mason, C. (2018). Overcoming constraints of collective imagination: An inquiry into activist

entrepreneuring, disruptive truth-telling and the creation of ‘possible worlds’. Journal of

Business Venturing, 33(1), 84–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.002.

Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2014). Rethinking the space of ethics in social entrepreneurship: Power,

subjectivity, and practices of freedom. Journal of Business Ethics,

(4) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2450-y.

Dey, P., & Teasdale, S. (2013). Social enterprise and dis/identification. Administrative Theory & Praxis,

(2), 248–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806350204.

Diochon, M., Durepos, G., & Anderson, A. R. (2011). Understanding opportunity in social

entrepreneurship as paradigm interplay. Social and Sustainable Entrepreneurship, 13,

–110.

Dwivedi, A., & Weerawardena, J. (2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship

construct. Journal of Business Research, 86,32–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.053.

Eisenhardt, K. M. E. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management

Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.

Erden, Z., Schneider, A., & Krogh, G. V. (2014). The multifaceted nature of social practices: A review of

the perspectives on practice-based theory building about organizations. European Management

Journal, 32(5), 712–722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.005.

Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, E. (1964). Introduction. In A. Etzioni, & E. Etzioni, (Eds), Social Change –

Sources, patterns, and consequences (pp. 3–9). London: Basic Books.

Fayolle, A., & Matlay, H. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: a multicultural and multidimensional

perspective. In A. Fayolle, & H. Matlay, (Eds.), Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship

(pp. 1–11). Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study – Problems and methods, Cheltenham:

Edward Elgar Publishing.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social

analysis, Berkeley: University of CA Press.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research:

Notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. doi: https://doi.

org/10.1177/1094428112452151.

Granados, M. L., Hlupic, V., Coakes, E., & Mohamed, S. (2011). Social enterprise and social

entrepreneurship research and theory. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 198–218. doi:

https://doi.

org/10.1108/17508611111182368.

Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating

role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/

s10551-014-2449-4.

Haugh, H. (2005). A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 1–12.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610580000703.

Hoogendoorn, B., Pennings, E., & Thurik, R. (2010). What do we know about social

entrepreneurship: An analysis of empirical research. International Review of

Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 71–112.

Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Praxis,

practice and practice architectures. In S. Kemmis, J. Wilkinson, C. Edwards-Groves, I. Hardy, P.

Grootenboer, & L. Bristol, (Eds.), Changing practices, changing education (pp. 25–40). London:

Springer.

Kenny, K., Haugh, H., & Fotaki, M. (2020). Organizational form and pro-social fantasy in social enterprise

creation. Human Relations, 73(1), 94–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718821413.

LaPiere, R. (1965). Social change, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Lehner, O. M., & Kansikas, J. (2013). Pre-paradigmatic status of social entrepreneurship research: A

systematic literature review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 198–219. doi: https://doi.

org/10.1080/19420676.2013.777360.

Locke, K., Feldman, M., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2020). Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates

for analyzing qualitative data. Organizationtal Research Methods.

Lumpkin, G. T., Bacq, S., & Pidduck, R. J. (2018). Where change happens: Community-level phenomena

in social entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 24–50. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12379.

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by

business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/

Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a preparadigmatic

field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633. doi: https://doi.org/

1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x.

Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oliver, D. P. (2011). Rigor in qualitative research editorial. Research on Aging, 33(4), 359–360. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027511410022.

Parkinson, C., & Howorth, C. (2008). The language of social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship &

Regional Development, 20(3), 285–309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701800507.

Partzsch, L., & Ziegler, R. (2011). Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power and

authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and

Economics, 11(1), 63–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9150-1.

Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches

and future directions for. Social Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,

(1), 82–115.

Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social

entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651–1655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jbusres.2015.10.033.

Santos, F. M., (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3),

–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4

.

Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional

issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,

(5-6), 373–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242.

Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices – A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.

Seelos, C., Mair, J., Battilana, J. & Dacin, M. T. (2010). The embeddeness of social entrepreneurship:

Understanding variations across local communities, Retrieved from IESE Business School –

University of Navarra: Working paper.

Shane, S. & Ventakamaran, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy

of Management Review, 23(3), 11–27.

Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions

and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161–194. doi: https://doi.org/

1002/sej.69.

Spicer, J., Kay, T., & Ganz, M. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as field encroachment: How a neoliberal

social movement constructed a new field. Socio-Economic Review, 17(1), 195–227. doi: https://doi.

org/10.1093/ser/mwz014.

Suddaby, R. (2012). Editor’s comment. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 6–9.

Sundin, E., & Tillmar, M. (2010). The intertwining of social, commercial and public entrepreneurship. in

A. Fayolle, & H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Social Entrepreneurship, Glos: Edward

Elgar, 142–156.

VanSandt, C. V., Sud, M., & Marne, C. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social

entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(S3), 419–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/

s10551-010-0419-z.

Zeyen, A., Beckmann, M., Mueller, S., Dees, J. G., Khanin, D., Krueger, N., ... Zacharakis, A. (2013). Social

entrepreneurship and broader theories: Shedding new light on the ‘bigger picture’. Journal of Social

Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 88–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.725422.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-06

Issue

Section

Research Paper