Sobre las dimensiones fractales de los ambientes constuidos y naturales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-2762.v21i36p174-193Palabras clave:
Complejidad visual. Fractales. Análisis fractal. Método de conteo de cajas. Paisaje natural. Edificios históricos.Resumen
En este estudio, se aplica el análisis fractal para la evaluación de la complejidad visual de edificios históricos y ambientes naturales circundantes. La dimensión fractal y sus aproximaciones, encontradas por medio del método de conteo de cajas (“boxcounting method”), se utilizan para definir la complejidad general y local de imágenes digitalizadas de edificios y paisajes. Se discuten las propiedades esenciales del método de conteo de cajas, y se elabora una versión optimizada del método. La hipótesis de la existencia de relación entre el nivel de complejidad fractal de ambientes construidos y de paisajes naturales es analizada para el caso conocido de la ciudad de Amasya, en Turquía, y también para dos ciudades históricas brasileñas, Ouro Preto y Pelotas. Los resultados obtenidos revelan un fuerte vínculo entre la dinámica espacial de dimensiones fractales de los ambientes construidos y naturales.
Descargas
Referencias
BATTY, M.; LONGLEY, P. Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994. 394 p.
BECHHOEFER, W.; BOVILL, C. Fractal analysis of traditional housing in Amasya, Turkey. Working Paper Series, University of California, v. 61, p. 1-21, 1994.
BOVILL, C. Fractal geometry in architecture and design. Boston: Birkhauser, 1996. 195 p.
BURKLE-ELIZONDO, G.; VALDEZ-CEPEDA, R. D. Fractal analysis of Mesoamerican pyramids. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences. New York, v. 10, p. 105-122, 2006.
BUCZKOWSKI, S.; KYRIACOS, S.; NEKKA, F.; CARTILIER, L. The modified box-counting method analysis of some characteristic parameters. Pattern Recognition. Amsterdã, v. 31, p. 411-418, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(97)00054-X
CAPO, D. The fractal nature of the architectural orders. Nexus Network Journal. Turim, v. 6, p. 30-40, 2004.
CARDILLO, A.; SCELLATO, S.; LATORA, S.; PORTA, S. Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns. Physical Review E. Nova York, v. 73, p. 066107-1-066107-8, 2006.
CHEN, S. S.; KELLER, J. M.; CROWNOVER, R. M. On the calculation of fractal features from images.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Los Alamitos, v. 15, p. 1087-1090, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/34.254066
DASILVA, D.; BOUDON, F.; GODIN, C.; PUECH, O.; SMITH, C.; SINOQUET, H. A critical appraisal of the box counting method to assess the fractal dimension of tree crowns. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlim, v. 4291, p. 751–760, 2006.
FALCONER, K. J. Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications. Chichester: Wiley, 2003. 400 p.
FOROUTAN-POUR, K.; DUTILLEUL, P.; SMITH, D. L. Advances in the implementation of the boxcounting method of fractal dimension. Applied Mathematics and Computation. Londres, v. 105, p.195-210, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10096-6.
FRANKHAUSER, P.; TANNIER, C. Fractalyse, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.fractalyse.org/enhome.html. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2014.
HAGERHALL, C. M.; PURCELL, T.; TAYLOR, R. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Amsterdã, v. 24, p. 247-255, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004
HEATH, T.; SMITH, S. G.; LIM, B. Tall buildings and the urban skyline: the effect of visual complexity on preferences. Environment and Behavior. Thousand Oaks, v. 32, p. 541–556, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972658.
JELINEK, H. F.; FERNANDEZ, E. Neurons and fractals: how reliable and useful are calculations of fractal dimensions?. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. Amsterdã, v. 81, p. 9-18, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00021-1.
JOYE Y. A review of the presence and use of fractal geometry in architectural design. Environment and Planning B. Londres, v. 38, p. 814-828, 2011. DOI: https://doi.or/10.1068/b36032.
KELLER, J. M.; CROWNOVER, R. M.; CHEN, R. Y. Characteristics of natural scenes related to the fractal dimension. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Los Alamitos, v. 9, p. 621-627, 1987.
LIANG, J.; HU, Y.; SUN, H. The design evaluation of the green space layout of urban squares based on fractal theory. Nexus Network Journal. Turim, v. 15, p. 33-49, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0135-3
LORENZ, W. E. Fractals and fractal architecture. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, 2002. 152 p.
MANDELBROT, B. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982. 468 p.
MANDELBROT, B. Fractals and the rebirth of iteration theory. In: PEITGEN, H.-O.; RICHTER, P. H. (Eds). The beaty of fractals: images of complex dynamical systems. Berlim: Springer, 1986. 199 p.
MILOSEVIC, N. T.; RISTANOVIC, D. Fractal and nonfractal properties of triadic Koch curve. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. Londres, v. 34, p. 1050-1059, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.117
MOISY, F. Boxcount, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.mathworks.com/ matlabcentral/fileexchange/13063-boxcount. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2014.
OSTWALD, M. J. Fractal architecture: late twentieth century connections between architecture and fractal geometry. Nexus Network Journal. Turim, v. 3, p. 73-83, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b38124
PEITGEN, H.-O.; JÜRGENS, H.; SAUPE, D. Chaos and fractals: new frontiers of science. New York: Springer, 2004. 864 p.
PERRY, S. G.; REEVES, R. W.; SIM, J. C. Landscape design and the language of nature. Landscape Review. Lincoln, v. 12, p. 3-18, 2008.
RODIN, V.; RODINA, E. The fractal dimension of Tokyo’s streets. Fractals. Singapura, v. 8, p. 413-418, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X00000457.
STAMPS, A. E. Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning. Amsterdã, v. 60, p. 163-184, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00054-3
THOMAS, I.; FRANKHAUSER, P.; FRENAY, B.; VERLEYSEN, M. Clustering patterns of urban built-up areas with curves of fractal scaling behaviour. Environment and Planning B. Local, v. 37, p. 942-954, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b36039
VAUGHAN, J.; OSTWALD, M. J. Using fractal analysis to compare the characteristic complexity of nature and architecture: re-examining the evidence. Architectural Science Review. Londres, v. 53, p. 323-332, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2010.0024
VOSS, R. Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In: PEITGEN, H.-O.; SAUPE, D. (Eds.). The science of fractal images. New York: Springer, 1988. 326 p.
VYZANTIADOU, M. A.; AVDELAS, A. V.; ZAFIROPOULOS, S. The application of fractal geometry to the design of grid or reticulated shell structures. Computer-Aided Design. Berlim, v. 39, p. 51-59, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2006.09.004
ZACHARIAS, J. Preferences for view corridors through the urban environment. Landscape and Urban Planning. Amsterdã, v. 43, p. 217–225, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00104-2
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
La revista Pós. del programa de postgrado FAUUSP está licenciada con una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
El titular de los derechos de autor es el autor del artículo. La revista Pós. sólo exige que la publicación del artículo sea inédita. El autor tiene el derecho de divulgar su artículo según su conveniencia debiendo citar la revista.
La revista Pós. autoriza la republicación de sus artículos desde que debidamente citada fuente y autoría.
DIADORIM - Diretório de Políticas Editoriais
