PACING OPPORTUNITIES AT HOME AND SKILL OF CHILDREN WITH POTENTIAL CHANGES IN FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Autores

  • Joselici da Silva MSc. in Public Health from Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Jaqueline da Silva Fronio PhD in Medical Sciences from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) and Professor at the Department of Physical Therapy - School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Rayla Amaral Lemos MSc. in Public Health from Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Luíz Cláudio Ribeiro PhD in Demography from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) and Professor at the Department of Statistics, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Thalita Souza de Aguiar Physiotherapist from Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Daniele Thomé Silva Physiotherapist from Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Marcela Tamiasso Vieira Physiotherapist from Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
  • Luiz Antônio Tavares Neves PhD in Child and Women’s Health at the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ) and Professor at the Maternal Child Department, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.96763

Palavras-chave:

child development, activities of daily living, premature, preschool children, risk factors.

Resumo

Introduction: the multifactorial nature of motor development is reinforced by the combination of biological and environmental risk factors, which intensify the chances of impaired motor development. Objectives: to verify the relationship between functional mobility skills of children with risk factors and motor stimulus opportunities in their home environment. Methods: transversal study conducted with 112 patients aged 18-42 months from follow-up services. Motor stimulus opportunities were evaluated by the Affordance in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD-SR) and Functional mobility skills by the Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory (PEDI). Student t test and multiple linear regression analysis were carried out. Results: predominance of good performance of functional mobility skills and “average level” of environmental stimulus opportunities were observed. There was no significant association between HFM-PEDI and AHEMD-SR. The results showed significant association only between HFM-PEDI and presence of health problems (p = 0.004). Children with health problems had lower mean PEDI normative score. Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant result for health problems in the interaction among environment, control variables and HFM-PEDI (p = 0.003). Conclusion: there was no association between functional mobility skills of children with risk factors and motor stimulus opportunities in their home environment. On the other hand, children with some health problem showed lower performance in functional mobility skills.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Mancini MC, Megale L, Brandão MB, Melo APP, Sampaio RF. Efeito moderador do risco social na relação entre risco biológico e desempenho funcional infantil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2004; 4:25-34. doi: 10.1590/S1519-38292 004000100003

Pilz EML, Schermann LB. Determinantes biológicos e ambientais no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor em uma amostra de crianças de Canoas/RS. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2007; 12(1):181-90. Doi:10.1590/S141381232007000100021

Halpern R, Giugliani ERJ, Victora CG, Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2002; 73:529-39. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062002000 500016

Lemos RA, Frônio JS, Ribeiro LC, Demarchi RS, Silva J, Neves LAT. Functional performance according to gestational age and birth weight of preschool children born premature or with low weight. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012; 22(1):17-26.

Cunha RDS, Lamy Filho F, Silva AAM, Lamy ZC. The predictive value of neonatal brain ultrasound in premature babies for impaired neurodevelopment with a corrected age of 12 months. J Hum Growth Dev. 2010; 20(3): 699-710.

Cardoso AA, Magalhães LC, Barbosa VM. Psychomotor development of preterm and full term children at school-age. J Hum Growth Dev. 2011; 21(2): 210-9.

Halpern R, Figueiras ACM. Influências ambientais na saúde mental da criança. J Pediatr. 2004; 80(2):104-10. Doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572004000300013

Formiga CKMR, Nonato JCR, Amaral LEF, Fagundes RR, Linhares MBM. Comparison of the motor development in preterm infants from two brazilian regional samples. J Hum Growth Dev. 2013; 23(3): 352-7.

Rodrigues OMPR, Bolsoni-Silva AT. Effects of the prematurity on the development of lactentes. J Hum Growth Dev. 2011; 21(1):111-21.

Khan NZ, Muslima H, Parveen M, Bhattacharya M, Begum N, Chowdhury S, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of pretrm infants in Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul; 118(1):280-9. Doi; 10.1542/peds.2005-2014

Maia RRP, Souza JMP. Factors associated with the low birth weight in municipality in northern Brazil. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2010; 20(3):735-44.

Isayama HF, Gallardo JSP. Desenvolvimento motor: análise dos estudos brasileiros sobre habilidades motoras fundamentais. Rev Educ Fis. 1998; 9(1): 75-82. Doi: 10.4025/reveducfisv9n1p75-82

Nobre FDA, Carvalho AEV, Martinez FE, Linhares MBM. Estudo longitudinal do desenvolvimento de crianças nascidas pré-termo no primeiro ano pós-natal. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2009; 22(3): 362-9. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722009000300006

Flehmig I. Texto e atlas do desenvolvimento normal e seus desvios no lactente: diagnóstico e tratamento precoce do nascimento até o 18º mês. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2005.

Rodrigues LP, Gabbard C. Avaliação das oportunidades de estimulação motora presentes na casa familiar: projecto affordances in the home environment for motor development. In: Barreiros J, Cordovil R, Carvalheira S. Desenvolvimento motor da criança. Lisboa: Ed. FMH; 2007. p. 51-60.

Frônio JS, Neves LAT, Ferraz ST, Demarchi RS, Vargas ALA. Análise da evasão em serviço de follow-up de recém-nascidos de alto risco. HU Rev. 2009; 35(3):219-26.

Lemos RA, Frônio JS, Neves LAT, Ribeiro LC. Estudo da prevalência de morbidades e complicações neonatais segundo o peso ao nascimento e a idade gestacional em lactentes de um serviço de follow-up. Rev APS. 2010;13(3): 277-90.

Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston M. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 50(10):744-50.Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03089.x

Rodrigues LP, Gabbard C. O AHEMD. Instrumento para avaliação das oportunidades de estimulação motora de crianças entre os 18 e os 42 meses de idade. In: Actas do II Congresso Internacional de Aprendizagem na Educação de Infância. 15-17 set. 2007; Maia. p. 51-59.

Mancini MC. Inventário de avaliação pediátrica de incapacidade (PEDI): manual da versão brasileira adaptada. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2005; p.184.

Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de classificação econômica Brasil. 2012. c2010. [citado em 2012 abr. 20]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/novo/Content.aspx?ContentID=301

Santos DCC, Campos D, Gonçalves VMG, Mello BBA, Campos TM, Gagliardo HGRG. Influência do baixo peso ao nascer sobre o desempenho motor de lactentes a termo no primeiro semestre de vida. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2004; 8(3):

-6.

Mello RR, Dutra MVP, Lopes JMA. Morbidade respiratória no primeiro ano de vida de prematuros egressos de uma unidade pública de tratamento intensivo neonatal. J Pediatr. 2004; 80(6): 503-10. Doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572004000800013

Torquato JA, Paes JB, Bento MCC, Saikai GMPN, Souto JN, Lima EAM, et al. Prevalence of neuropsychomotor development delay in preschool children. J Hum Growth Dev. 2011; 21(2): 259-68.Doi: 10.1590/S0104-12822011

Macarini SM, Vieira ML. Schoolchildren’s play behavior in the toy library. J Hum Growth Dev. 2006; 16(1): 49-60. Doi: 10.1590/S0104-128 22006000100006

Alves RCP, Veríssimo Maria DLÓR. Day-care center caregivers and their conflict between giving care and teaching. J Hum Growth Dev. 2007; 17(1): 13-25. Doi: 10.1590/S0104-128 22007000100003

Cabral AL, Teixeira LR. Vencendo a asma: uma abordagem multidisciplinar. São Paulo: Bevilacqua; 1994; 96 p.

Moraes MCL, Rabinovich EP. Resilience: an introductory discussion. J Hum Growth Dev. 1996; 6(1/2): 10-3.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-04-07

Edição

v. 25 n. 1 (2015)

Seção

Pesquisa Original

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis