THE HEALTH SCHOOL PROGRAMME: A HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGY IN PRIMARY CARE IN BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.96709Palavras-chave:
Health evaluation, health school programme, primary health care.Resumo
Introduction: the Health School Programme (HSP) should be understood as a permanent development process. In this context, the actions of a policy aimed at children and adolescentsare paramount in the HSP. Objective: to identify and describe the actions developed by the Family Health Group in the HSP, from the National Programme for ImprovingAccess and Quality of Primary Care (PIPCAQ). Methods: this cross-sectional research used secondary data collected fromthe 17,202 groups who joined PIPCAQ in 2012. Results: all regions showed significant results concerning the execution of school activities. the Northern region was the one that performed most school actions (80.5%), followed by the Northeast, Midwest, South and Southeast, respectively. However, some items, such as professional training in education and health work need to be streng the ned. Conclusion: HSP in Brazil has mobilised significant actions, even though it has not happened in homogeneously in all Brazilian regions.Downloads
Referências
Miclos PV, Calvo MCM,Colussi CF. Avaliação do desempenho da atenção primária em saúde através da análise envoltória de dados. Rev Eletr Gestão Saúde. (2015; 6(2): 1749-63.
Pinto Junior EP, Cavalcante JLM, Sousa RA, Morais APP, Silva MGC. Análise da produção científica sobre avaliação, no contexto da saúde da família, em periódicos brasileiros. Saúde Debate. 2015; 39(104): 268-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-110420151040226.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Instrutivo PSE. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de atenção básica. Cadernos de Atenção Básica. Saúde na escola. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009.
Fausto MCR, Fonseca HS. Rotas de atenção básica no Brasil: experiências do trabalho de campo PMAQ/AB. Rio de Janeiro: Saberes; 2013. 6. Gomes LC. O desafio da intersetorialidade: a experiência do Programa Saúde na Escola (PSE) em Manguinhos, no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Rio de Janeiro: 2012.
Vitalle MSS, Almeida RG, Silva FC. Capacitação na atenção à saúde do adolescente: experiência de ensino. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2010; 34(3): 459-468.
Marques JF, Queiroz MV. Cuidado ao adolescente na atenção básica: necessidades dos usuários e sua relação com o serviço. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2012; 33(3): 65-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-14472012000300009.
Raposo C. A Política de Atenção Integral à Saúde do Adolescente e Jovem: uma perspectiva de garantia de direito à saúde? Rev Pauta. Rio de Janeiro: 2009; 6(23): 117-38.
Santiago LM, Rodrigues MTP, Oliveira Junior AD, Moreira TMM. Implantaçãoo do Programa Saúde na Escola em Fortaleza-CE: atuação de equipe da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012; 65(6): 1026-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672012000600020.
Ferraz DAS, Nemes MIB. Avaliação da implantação de atividades de prevenção das DST/AIDS na atenção básica: um estudo de caso na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo, Brasil.Cad Saúde Pública. 2009; 25(Suppl2): S240-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102311X2009001400006.
Baratieri T, Marcon SS. Longitudinalidade no trabalho do enfermeiro: identificando dificuldades e perspectivas de transformação. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2012; 21(3): 549-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012 000300009.
Roecker S, Budó MLD, Marcon SS. Trabalho educativo do enfermeiro na Estratégia Saúde da Família: dificuldades e perspectivas de mudanças. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2012; 46(3): 641-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342012000300016.
Silva Junior AJ. Programa saúde na escola: limites e possibilidades intersetoriais. Interface. 2014; 18(51): 799. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622014.0583.
Ferreira IRC, Moysés SJ, França BHS, Carvalho ML, Moysés ST. Percepções de gestores locais sobre a intersetorialidade no Programa Saúde na Escola. Rev Bras Educ. 2014; 19(56): 61-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782014000100004.
Bezerra IMP, Machado MFAS, Souza OF, Antão JYFL, Dantas MNL, Reis AOA, et al. Professional activity in the context of health education: a systematic review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2014; 24(3): 255-262. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhdg.88909.
Arash HK, Carpentier R. The evolving role of public health in the delivery of health care. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012; 22(3): 396-399. systematic review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2014;24(3): 255-262.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis