Avaliação psicológica dos efeitos secundários da triagem sistemática da surdez neonatal permanente

Autores

  • Barbara Le Driant
  • Luc Vandromme
  • Catherine Kolski
  • Valdimir Strunski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.40004

Palavras-chave:

Surdez neonatal. Triagem. Ansiedade parental. Interações precoces.

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar o impacto psicológico da triagem sistemática da surdez nos pais das crianças criadas. Informar os pais de uma surdez potencial desde os primeiros d^las de vida pode provocar uma angústia materna assim como uma desorganização das primeiras relações mae-criança. Os resultados obtidas mostram que os pais apresentam um nível alto de ansiedades porém mantendo interações de qualidade com o seu bebê.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Barbara Le Driant
    Equipe ECCHAT - Laboratoire d’Efficience Cognitive dans les Concuites Humaines d’Apprentissage et de Travail, Université de Picacardie Jules Verne
  • Luc Vandromme
    Equipe ECCHAT - Laboratoire d’Efficience Cognitive dans les Concuites Humaines d’Apprentissage et de Travail, Université de Picacardie Jules Verne
  • Catherine Kolski
    Equipe ECCHAT - Laboratoire d’Efficience Cognitive dans les Concuites Humaines d’Apprentissage et de Travail, Université de Picacardie Jules Verne
  • Valdimir Strunski
    Serviço ORL - Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-facial do CHU - Centro Hospitalar Universitário, de Amiens.

Referências

Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Evaluation dc la Santé (FR). Evaluation clinique et économique du dépistage néonatal de lasurdité permanente par les otoémissions a coustiques provoquées. Paris: RapportJuin; 1999.

Appuzo ML, Yoshinaya-Itano C. Early identification of infants with significant hearing loss and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Semin Hear. 1995; 16(2): 124-37.

Robinshaw HM Early intervention for hearing impairment: differences in the timing of communicative and linguistic development. Br J Audiol 1995; 29: 315-34.

Yoshinaya-ltano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early and later-identified children withering loss. Pediatrics1998; 102: 1161-71.

Pajulo M, Savonlathti E, Sourander A, Piha J, Helenius H. Prenatal maternal representations: mothers at psychosocial risk. Infant Ment Health J 2001;22(5):529-44.

Barringer DG, Mauk GW, Jensen S, Woods Kershner N. Survey of parents’ perceptions regarding hospital-based newborn screening. Audiol Today. 1997; 9(1): 18-9.

Magnuson M, Hergils L. The parents’ view on hearing screening in newborns. Feelings, thoughts and opinions on otoacustic emissionsscreening. Scand Audiol .1999; 28: 47-56.

Weichbold V, Phil MD, Welzl-Mueller K. Maternal concern about positive test results in universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics2001; 108(5): 1111-6.

Weichbold V, Welzl-Mueller K, MussbacherE. The impact of information on maternal attitudes towards universal neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 59-66.

Laganière J, Tessier R, Nadeau I. Attachmentdans le cadre de la prématurité: un lienmédiatisé par les perceptions maternelles. Enfance 2003; 55(2):101-18.

Fava-Vizziello G, Calvo V, Simonelli A. The effects of preterm birth on parental representations and child development. [Communication at 17º Congress World Association for Mental Health; 2000 Juil 26-30; Montréal, Canada].

Stuart A, Moretz M, Yang EY. An investigation of maternal stress after neonatal hearing screening. Am J Audiol 2000; 9(2):135-41.

Downloads

Publicado

2004-08-19

Edição

v. 14 n. 2 (2004)

Seção

Pesquisa Original

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis