Desigualdades na saúde: desafios, oportunidades e o que você pode fazer sobre isso
English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152156Palavras-chave:
seguro de saúde, profissionais, prestadores de cuidados de saúde privadosResumo
Disparidades raciais nos resultados de saúde, acesso a cuidados de saúde, cobertura de seguro e qualidade de atendimento nos Estados Unidos existem há muitos anos. O desenvolvimento e a implementação de estratégias efetivas para reduzir ou eliminar as disparidades de saúde são dificultadas pela nossa incapacidade de avaliar com precisão a extensão e os tipos de disparidades de saúde devido à disponibilidade limitada de informações específicas de raça / etnia, confiabilidade limitada dos dados e informações existentes. e a crescente diversidade da população americana. Variações na classificação racial e étnica usadas para coletar dados dificultam a obtenção de índices confiáveis e precisos de indicadores de saúde e, em alguns casos, causam viés na estimativa de medidas de saúde específicas de raça / etnia. Em 1978, o Escritório de Administração e Orçamento (OMB) publicou a "Diretriz 15" intitulada "Normas Raciais e Étnicas para Estatísticas Federais e Relatórios Administrativos" e forneceu um conjunto de diretrizes claras para classificar as pessoas por raça e etnia. O acesso a cuidados de saúde, factores comportamentais e psicossociais, bem como diferenças culturais, contribuem para as variações raciais e étnicas que existem na saúde de uma pessoa. Para ajudar a eliminar as disparidades de saúde, devemos garantir a igualdade de acesso aos serviços de saúde, bem como a qualidade do atendimento. Os prestadores de cuidados de saúde devem tornar-se culturalmente competentes e compreender as diferenças existentes entre as pessoas que servem para eliminar as disparidades. O aprimoramento dos sistemas de coleta de dados é essencial para desenvolver e implementar intervenções direcionadas para lidar com problemas específicos da população. O desenvolvimento de programas abrangentes e multiníveis para eliminar as disparidades na atenção à saúde exige coordenação e colaboração entre os setores público, privado e profissional (departamentos de saúde locais, estaduais e federais), privados (empresas de seguro-saúde, provedores privados de saúde) e profissionais (médicos e enfermeiros), farmacêuticos, laboratórios, etc).
Downloads
Referências
2. Chang MH, Molla MT, Truman B, Athar H, Moonesinghe R, Yoon PW. Differences in healthy life expectancy for the US population by sex, race/ethnicity and geographic region: 2008. J Public Health. 2015;37(3):470-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu059
3. Humes KR, Jones NA, Ramirez RR, Department of Commerce; Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. Census Brief. Census Bureau, 2011.
4. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Current Population Reports. Washington: Census Bureau, 2015.
5. Rosenberg HM, Maurer JD, Sorlie PD, Johnson NJ, MacDorman MF, Hoyert DL, et al. Quality of death rates by race and Hispanic origin: a summary of current research, 1999. Vital Health Stat 2. 1999;(128):1-13.
6. Anderson MJ. The american census: a social history. New Haven: Connecticut. Yale University Press, 1988.
7. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Statistics of the United States 1975. Volume II; Mortality, Part A. Public Health Service. Hysattsville, Maryland, 1979.
8. Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. Washington: 1997.
9. Hahn RA. The State of Federal Health Statistics on racial and ethnic groups. JAMA. 1992;267(2):268-71.
10. Williams DR. Race, socioeconomic status and health: The added effects of racism and discrimination. Ann N York Acad Sci. 1999;896(1):173-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08114.x
11. Hambright TZ. Comparability of marital status, race, nativity, and country of origin on the death certificate and matching census record. Vital Health Stat 2. 1969;(34):1-47.
12. Freedman MA. Health Status Indicators for the year 2000. Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes. 1991;1(1):1-4.
13. Maiese DR.Healthy People 2010: Leading health indicators for women. Women’s Health Issues. 2002;12(4):155-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-3867(02)00140-8
14. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, 2017.
15. Keppel KG, Pearcy JN, Wagener DK. Trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for the health status indicators: United States, 1990-98. Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes. 2002;(23):1-16.
16. QuickStats: age-Adjusted Death Rates, by Race/Ethnicity - National Vital Statistics System, United States, 2014-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:375. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6613a6
17. Heron M. Deaths: Leading causes for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;65(2):1-95.
18. Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD, Curtin SC, Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(6):1-75.
19. Brault MW. Americans with disabilities: 2010. Current Populations Report. 2012; p.70-131.
20. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, 2016.
21. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2003. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, 2003.
22. Grunbaum J, Kann L, Kinchen S, Williams B, Ross JG, Lowry R, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 2001. J School Health. 2002;72(8):313-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb07917.x
23. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(1):1-55.
24. Barnett JC, Berchick ER. Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2016. Current Population Reports. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2017; p.60-260.
25. Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666-8.
26. Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE, Bland SD, Holtzman D. State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;;49(2):1-60.
27. Scribner R. Paradox as paradigm--the health outcomes of Mexican Americans. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(3):303-5.
28. Scribner R, Dwyer JH. Acculturation and low birthweight among Latinos in the Hispanic HANES. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(9):1263-7.
29. Merrianm-Webster’s collegiate dictionary. 10th ed. Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. Springfield: 2001.
30. Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretical framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1212
31. Williams DR. Socioeconomic differentials in health: a review and redirection. Soc Psychol Quart. 1990;53(2):81-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786672
32. Newacheck PW, HungYY, Wright KK. Racial and ethnic disparities in access to care for children with special health care needs. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2(4):247-54.
33. Campanelli, Richard M: Addressing racial and ethnic health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1624-6.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis