KNOWLEDGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN OBJECTIVE TESTS ON BASIC LIFE SUPPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.106002Palavras-chave:
Basic life support, training, graduate students, knowledge, evaluation, questionnare.Resumo
Introduction: Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) is a serious public health problem and represents one of the leading causes of death in the world. In emergency situations the assessment of the victim and care must be effective, to reduce negative outcomes and to increase the survival rate. Objective: To analyze graduation students in the Health Sciences through objective testing on Basic Life Support (BLS). Methods: This is a descriptive, observational and cross sectional study, performed in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The study population consisted of 664 graduation students in Medicine, Nursing, Physiotherapy, Pharmacy, Nutrition and Occupational Therapy. Data collection occurred through an instrument in the form of objective tests based on the guidelines for Basic Life Support from the American Heart Association. For analysis the Shapiro-Wilk, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. The adopted confidence level was 95%. The statistical program used was Stata 11.0. Result: There was found to be a prevalence of students who were female (82.23%), single (77.56%), on the physiotherapy course (53.16%), in the freshmen year (32.2%) with previous training (54.45%) and with a median age of 22 years old. When the association between the scores was analyzed according to sex, marital status, previous training, course and year of study, the relation between the number of correct answers and previous training, course and year of study showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Conclusion: 99.9% of subjects had lower score than the minimum score of 84% of Americam Heart Association, which characterizes insufficient knowledge about the basic support of life theme. Thus, there is need for continued training of health sciences students on the subject, at the undergraduate level.Downloads
Referências
Swor R, Khan I, Domeier R, Honeycutt L, Chu K, Compton S. CPR training and CPR performance: do CPR-trained bystanders perform CPR? Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(6):596-601. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.021.
Gonzalez MM, Timerman S, Gianotto-Oliveira R, Polastri TF, Canesin MF, Schimidt A, et al. I Guideline for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care – Brazilian Society of Cardiology: Executive Summary. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;100(2):105-13. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20130022.
Pergola AM, Araujo IE. Laypeople and basic life support. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009; 43(2): 335-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000200012.
Berg MD, Schexnayder SM, Chameides L, Terry M, Donoghue A, Hickey RW, et al. Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S862-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971085
Meissner TM, Kloppe C, Hanefeld C. Basic life support skills of high school students before and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a longitudinal investigation. Scand J Trauma ResuscEmerg Med. 2012;20:31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-31.
Roppolo LP, Pepe PE. Retention, retention, retention: targeting the young in CPR skills training! Crit Care. 2009;13(5):185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7997.
Fredriksson M, Herlitz J, Nichol G. Variation in outcome in studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a review of studies conforming to the Utstein guidelines. Am J Emerg Med. 2003; 21(4): 276-81.
Perkins GD, Brace SJ, Smythe M, Ong G, Gates S. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: recent advances in resuscitation and effects on outcome. Heart. 2012;98(7):529-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300802.
Maia JA. Metodologias problematizadoras em currículos de graduação médica. RevBrasEduc Med. 2014;38(4):566-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-55022014000400018.
Vieira LJES, Carneiro RCMM, Frota MA, Gomes ALA, Ximenes LB. Actions and possibilities of accidents prevention with children in daycare at Fortaleza, Ceara State. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2009;14(5):1687-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232009000500010.
Vieira JE, Tamousauskas MRG. Avaliação das resistências de docentes a propostas de renovações em currículos de graduação em medicina. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2013; 37(1): 32-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-55022013000100005.
Quintero GA. Medical education and the healthcare system—why does the curriculum need to be reformed? BMC Med. 2014;12:213. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0213-3.
Tan EC, Hekkert KD, van Vugt AB, Biert J. First aid and basic life support: a questionnaire survey of medical schools in the Netherlands. Teach Learn Med. 2010; 22(2): 112-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401331003656538.
Alves TS, Cogo ALP. Searching for evidences for Training in Basic Life Support - a systematic literature review. Online Braz J Nurs. 2006; 5(2).
Bezerra IMP, Machado MFAS, Souza OF, Lima Antão JYF, Dantas MNL, Reis AOA, et al. Professional activity in the context of health education: a systematic review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2014;24(3):255-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhdg.88909.
Monteiro CBM, Almeida Junior ÁDd, Wajnzstejn R. Project management in health and medical research. J Hum Growth Dev. 2014; 24(3): 239-242. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhdg.88895
Ferreira M, Ferreira C, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Murad N, Meneghini A, et al. Myocardium tissue changes caused by electrical transthoracic discharges in rats. Int Arch Med. 2009;2:31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-31.
Herrero D, Gallo PR, Fujimori M, Monteiro CBM, Valenti VE, Tavares CM, et al. Motor development of infants exposed to maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but not infected. Int Arch Med. 2013;6:45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-6-45.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis